1997issue C121-5
Constructing an investor preference index from two capitalization-weighted series
The investor-preference-index is assembled from weekly closes of a 500-name large-cap index and a broader exchange composite, then smoothed so mid-cap-preference and blue-chip-preference can be read as a constructed market-context series.
- Market-breadth is taken from two capitalization-weighted indices so the residual isolates the mid-cap remainder instead of counting advancing and declining names.
- The raw-ipi is the six-month-change of the broader composite minus the six-month-change of the large-cap index after both series are placed on a natural-log scale.
- A trend-filter turns that residual into the published preference reading by summing a fast-versus-slow average difference over a long weekly window and then rescaling the total.
- Rank-rotation follows the preference reading rather than a single-index price rule, and the archive compares that procedure with a buy-and-hold-baseline.
What the preference series is
The investor-preference-index is a constructed spread that compares six-month log changes in a large-cap index and a broader exchange composite, then smooths the residual into a long-horizon preference reading. In this construction, market-breadth is relative participation inferred from two capitalization-weighted indices instead of from an advance-decline count.
The preference series is built from weekly closes of a 500-name large-cap index and a capitalization-weighted composite of all common stocks on the same exchange, so the residual isolates the mid-cap remainder. At year-end 1996 the exchange composite capitalization was about 6.75 trillion and the 500-name index about 5.5 trillion, leaving more than 1 trillion, or about 15 percent, in the mid-cap remainder.
The leadership hypothesis
The construction hypothesis is that mid-cap names lead early in a bull phase and large-cap names lead in the final stage, contrary to the idea that bull markets end in a speculative frenzy. Mid-cap-preference is that early-cycle condition, in which the broader exchange composite outperforms the large-cap index. Blue-chip-preference is the late-cycle condition, in which large-cap names outperform the mid-cap remainder.
From raw residual to published reading
Each index is first converted to a natural-log scale. The raw-ipi is the six-month-change of the broader composite minus the six-month-change of the 500-name index.
The published preference reading is a 54-week sum of the difference between the 15-week and 33-week averages of that residual, then rescaled by adding 1 and multiplying by 100 so the series typically occupies a band near plus or minus 0.1 before rescaling. That step is the trend-filter: a multi-week moving-average difference of the raw preference series, summed over a longer window so only persistent leadership changes register.
Sample history and overlay behavior
The weekly sample runs from the 1966 inception of the exchange composite through 19 September 1997. The timing test begins on 2 August 1968 because the smoother needs about two and a half years of history. The preference overlay is more volatile before 1980 than after, which the construction notes attribute to a smaller listed universe of about 1,200 names in 1968 and to later concentration of interest in the 500-name index.
Visual inspection of the log large-cap series with the preference overlay, later checked in software, associates steep preference downturns with corrections or crashes rather than treating the overlay as a price-pattern top call.
Timing against an untimed baseline
Rank-rotation is the timing procedure that stays invested, exits, or stays out according to the preference reading rather than a single-index price rule. The timing procedure is compared with an untimed 10,000 large-cap buy-and-hold-baseline that reaches a 88,800 gain by mid-September 1997. Under the published parameters the preference system records a 134,500 net gain and more than 50 percent outperformance versus that baseline.
The same procedure is out of the market for seven extended periods in the 1978 to 1987 window, with each exit preceding or limiting a decline. The source states a 20 percent drawdown in a long correction as a floor for what later drawdowns can reasonably be expected to reach.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
- 1987A mechanical rank-rotation sleeve for monthly fund leaders
- 1989Rank rotation in a five-name no-load sleeve
- 1990Cycle-tested five-year fund rank rotation
- 1991Blue-chip rank rotation by relative-strength-index slope
- 1992Currency rank rotation and intermarket timing
- 1992Rank rotation and relative strength for portfolio construction
- 1994MACD crossovers then short-horizon rank rotation
- 1994A comparable group-trend ledger from published ranks
- 1997Normalized yield rank rotation as a full portfolio procedure
- 1997Constructing an investor preference index from two capitalization-weighted series
- 1998Constructing anchored momentum from a centered average
- 2000Rank rotation, a stop-loss order, and Relative Strength Index in fund switching
- 2003A one-fund daily rank is a two-sleeve construction problem
- 2004Evaluate rank rotation only where persistence already exists
- 2004Sector fund rank rotation with regression and trailing stops
- 2006Evaluating equal-weight annual yield-rank rotation
- 2007Weekly preferred-symbol reselection for mechanical trend systems
- 2011Portfolio capacity and entry pacing for mechanical systems
- 2011Rank rotation as a testable ETF construction procedure
- 2011The inverse-Fisher stochastic is a forecast layer until the book rules can be disabled
- 2012An underwater stretch is a sizing test for rank rotation
- 2015Rule-based ETF rotation as one testable procedure
- 2015MACD crossover evaluation by trend rank rotation
- 2015Persistence and strength as one close-to-close switch
- 2015Evaluating rank rotation after a persistence screen
- 2016Evaluating an annual valuation rank rotation
- 2017A two-step yield and price rank rotation for a five-name sleeve
- 2018Smoothed volatility and the missing rank-rotation exit
- 2018A five-condition scorecard that ranks stocks and can refuse the trade
- 2018Small-cap growth sleeve eligibility with trend and rank rotation
- 2018Evaluating rank-rotation momentum across fund wrappers
- 2019Evaluating an annual equity-gold momentum rank rotation