Skip to main content
Track Rank rotation
36 / 39
Library

2020issue C0948-56

Four-dimension relative strength as rank rotation

The four-dimension procedure scores a security against many reference series, collapses those pair tiers into one rank, and compares candidates only from prices retrieved on the same date.

  • A four-dimension score is the stacked moving-average state of a price-ratio series, coded as a discrete tier and then averaged across many reference pairs.
  • Rank-rotation scores each candidate against a shared basket of market references, ranks those scores, and uses the order to keep, rotate, or skip a holding.
  • Shared-date evaluation retrieves every target and every benchmark as of the same calendar date so ranks compare like observations.
  • A signal line is a short moving average of the composite score and separates a raw rank from its recent trend.
Entries in this reading2 entries

Score first, then rank

The four-dimension procedure scores a security by pairing it with many reference series rather than with a single index, then collapses those pair scores into one rank.

Rank-rotation, as used here, scores each candidate against a shared basket of market references, ranks the resulting scores, and uses that order to decide which holdings to keep, rotate, or skip.

TradersWeek editorial view: treat portfolio construction as that ranking procedure, not as a single-index residual.

Build each pair the same way

Each pair is formed as the candidate close divided by a reference close, then passed through the same multi-horizon moving-average state machine.

The state machine uses a fast exponential average of the pair series, then medium, slow, and very-slow simple averages of that fast line. It maps the four-line order into discrete tiers of 10, 9, 5, or 0.

Collapse the basket into one composite

The four-dimension score is the stacked moving-average state of a price-ratio series, coded as a discrete tier and then averaged across many reference pairs.

A composite oscillator is the mean of the pair tiers across the reference basket, scaled, then smoothed. A shorter average of that oscillator is plotted as a signal line.

The signal line separates a raw rank from its recent trend. Once the basket is reduced to a single numeric score that can be ranked across candidates, that score is a relative-strength-index: a multi-horizon comparison of a security's price path to several reference series.

Use a cross-context reference basket

Reference baskets in the supplied implementations span large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap, growth, value, emerging-market, real-estate, gold, utility, and bond series. The rank is a cross-context score, not a single-index residual.

Sort many targets on one sheet

A batch ranking sheet evaluates many target symbols against the same benchmark set. It can sort first by one composite field and then by a tie-break field, or the reverse, and still produce the same order.

Same-day RS4r ranking of target funds, 15 July 2020

The sorted Excel sheet is what a rotation decision would have used on 15 July 2020: China region, Nasdaq composite, QQQ and blue-chip growth print RS4r 90.91 with RS5 at 100, FIVFX heads the 72.73 group that the four-dimension method uses RS5 to break, and the two S&P 500 trackers FXAIX and SPY tie at 63.64. Figures come from the visible top of the 31-row rankings table after every target was retrieved on that same date.
The sorted Excel sheet is what a rotation decision would have used on 15 July 2020: China region, Nasdaq composite, QQQ and blue-chip growth print RS4r 90.91 with RS5 at 100, FIVFX heads the 72.73 group that the four-dimension method uses RS5 to break, and the two S&P 500 trackers FXAIX and SPY tie at 63.64. Figures come from the visible top of the 31-row rankings table after every target was retrieved on that same date.Fidelity funds plus QQQ and SPY · Daily, 15 July 2020 · 2020-07-15T00:00:00.000Z to 2020-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

RS4r is the 11-benchmark composite rounded to two decimals. Mutual-fund NAVs for 16 July 2020 had not posted, so every row uses the 15 July close. RS5 is the 10-session share of RS4r readings at or above 80, scaled to 100. Only the rows visible on the rankings sheet are plotted, not the full 31-name list.

Keep every series on the same date

Target and benchmark prices must be retrieved as of the same date. Otherwise the ranks mix unmatched observations.

Shared-date evaluation means retrieving every target and every benchmark as of the same calendar date so ranks compare like observations.

Benchmark history need be pulled only once per evaluation day unless the mix of references changes. Per-symbol scoring after that is treated as inexpensive.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
36 of 39 in the Rank rotation track
20208-16 pp.Next on Rank rotationPortfolio construction as a ranked relative-strength problemA relative-strength reading is a ratio of one security to another security or index, and it has meaning only against earlier values of the same series.
All readings on this track · 39 readings
  1. 1987A mechanical rank-rotation sleeve for monthly fund leaders
  2. 1989Rank rotation in a five-name no-load sleeve
  3. 1990Cycle-tested five-year fund rank rotation
  4. 1991Blue-chip rank rotation by relative-strength-index slope
  5. 1992Currency rank rotation and intermarket timing
  6. 1992Rank rotation and relative strength for portfolio construction
  7. 1994MACD crossovers then short-horizon rank rotation
  8. 1994A comparable group-trend ledger from published ranks
  9. 1997Normalized yield rank rotation as a full portfolio procedure
  10. 1997Constructing an investor preference index from two capitalization-weighted series
  11. 1998Constructing anchored momentum from a centered average
  12. 2000Rank rotation, a stop-loss order, and Relative Strength Index in fund switching
  13. 2003A one-fund daily rank is a two-sleeve construction problem
  14. 2004Evaluate rank rotation only where persistence already exists
  15. 2004Sector fund rank rotation with regression and trailing stops
  16. 2006Evaluating equal-weight annual yield-rank rotation
  17. 2007Weekly preferred-symbol reselection for mechanical trend systems
  18. 2011Portfolio capacity and entry pacing for mechanical systems
  19. 2011Rank rotation as a testable ETF construction procedure
  20. 2011The inverse-Fisher stochastic is a forecast layer until the book rules can be disabled
  21. 2012An underwater stretch is a sizing test for rank rotation
  22. 2015Rule-based ETF rotation as one testable procedure
  23. 2015MACD crossover evaluation by trend rank rotation
  24. 2015Persistence and strength as one close-to-close switch
  25. 2015Evaluating rank rotation after a persistence screen
  26. 2016Evaluating an annual valuation rank rotation
  27. 2017A two-step yield and price rank rotation for a five-name sleeve
  28. 2018Smoothed volatility and the missing rank-rotation exit
  29. 2018A five-condition scorecard that ranks stocks and can refuse the trade
  30. 2018Small-cap growth sleeve eligibility with trend and rank rotation
  31. 2018Evaluating rank-rotation momentum across fund wrappers
  32. 2019Evaluating an annual equity-gold momentum rank rotation
  33. 2019Evaluating equity-gold momentum on funds versus indexes
  34. 2020How a signed comparative-strength oscillator is built for rank rotation
  35. 2020Which calendar clock changes a gold-versus-equity rotation test
  36. 2020Four-dimension relative strength as rank rotation
  37. 2020Portfolio construction as a ranked relative-strength problem
  38. 2020Two clocks for a Nasdaq put/call sleeve
  39. 2020Rank, filter, and stop the hedge sleeve as one procedure
All 51 readings tagged Rank rotation
Also on Rank rotation5 readings