Skip to main content
Track Rank rotation
26 / 38
Library

2016issue C0310

Evaluating an annual valuation rank rotation

The archive used a signed earnings-yield residual as a once-a-year membership sort on 19 large Nasdaq OMX Helsinki names. Long, short, and abstain buckets were then inspected together across a bear year, a turnaround year, and a bull year.

  • ABR is the signed gap between a stock's earnings-yield and a required-return built from a 10-year government bond yield plus an equity risk-premium estimate.
  • Each February the same sort was applied to 19 large Nasdaq OMX Helsinki names, splitting the universe by the sign of ABR and recording the next year's total return for each bucket.
  • A long-short book that owned positive-ABR names and shorted the rest sat beside the long-only buckets, so abstention was part of the same annual-rebalance.
  • The 2011-2013 window was chosen because it included a bear market, a turnaround year, and a bull market.
Entries in this reading1 entry

A signed residual as the membership rule

ABR was defined as the gap between a stock's earnings-yield and a required-return. Earnings-yield was the inverse of the price-to-earnings ratio, taken from a consensus earnings-per-share estimate in the illustrated case. Required-return was the sum of a 10-year government bond yield and an equity risk-premium estimate.

A positive ABR was treated as an undervaluation signal relative to that required-return hurdle. The signed gap was then used to rank names into positive and non-positive portfolios.

An annual sort across three market states

The same ABR sort was applied every February to 19 large names from the Nasdaq OMX Helsinki list over 2011-2013. The universe was split by the sign of ABR, and each bucket's subsequent annual total return was recorded.

Comparison series reported with those ABR buckets were a portfolio of all 19 names and the Nasdaq OMX Helsinki index. The window was chosen because it included a bear market, a turnaround year, and a bull market.

The 19-name set was described as challenging because the stocks tended to fall with the market and then lag during the later turnaround and bull phases. ABR was used to identify which names to keep out of the long book.

Entry, exit, and abstention in one rotation

Each February, names were resorted by ABR and held for the following year's total-return window.

A long-short variant that owned positive-ABR names and shorted non-positive-ABR names was tabulated beside the long-only buckets and the index. Abstention meant leaving non-positive ABR names out of the long book, or using them only on the short side, as part of the same rotation rule. Entry, exit, and abstention therefore sat inside one annual rotation.

Annual returns of ABR-sorted Helsinki portfolios, 2011–2013

A once-a-year ABR sort on 19 large Nasdaq OMX Helsinki names: long the positive residual, short the rest, and hold the market as a check across a bear year, a turnaround year, and a bull year. Bars are the annual total returns the source table listed for 2011, 2012, and 2013.
A once-a-year ABR sort on 19 large Nasdaq OMX Helsinki names: long the positive residual, short the rest, and hold the market as a check across a bear year, a turnaround year, and a bull year. Bars are the annual total returns the source table listed for 2011, 2012, and 2013.19 large Nasdaq OMX Helsinki stocks · annual, reset each February · 2011-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2013-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Membership is reset each February from the signed earnings-yield residual (ABR). The 19-name universe is the authors’ large-cap Helsinki set, not the full index.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
26 of 38 in the Rank rotation track
201722-23 pp.Next on Rank rotationA two-step yield and price rank rotation for a five-name sleeveThe sleeve is limited to five names drawn from a 30-name set of well-known US companies rather than from the full equity market.
All readings on this track · 38 readings
  1. 1987A mechanical rank-rotation sleeve for monthly fund leaders
  2. 1989Rank rotation in a five-name no-load sleeve
  3. 1990Cycle-tested five-year fund rank rotation
  4. 1991Blue-chip rank rotation by relative-strength-index slope
  5. 1992Currency rank rotation and intermarket timing
  6. 1992Rank rotation and relative strength for portfolio construction
  7. 1994MACD crossovers then short-horizon rank rotation
  8. 1994A comparable group-trend ledger from published ranks
  9. 1997Normalized yield rank rotation as a full portfolio procedure
  10. 1997Constructing an investor preference index from two capitalization-weighted series
  11. 1998Constructing anchored momentum from a centered average
  12. 2000Rank rotation, a stop-loss order, and Relative Strength Index in fund switching
  13. 2003A one-fund daily rank is a two-sleeve construction problem
  14. 2004Evaluate rank rotation only where persistence already exists
  15. 2004Sector fund rank rotation with regression and trailing stops
  16. 2006Evaluating equal-weight annual yield-rank rotation
  17. 2007Weekly preferred-symbol reselection for mechanical trend systems
  18. 2011Portfolio capacity and entry pacing for mechanical systems
  19. 2011Rank rotation as a testable ETF construction procedure
  20. 2011The inverse-Fisher stochastic is a forecast layer until the book rules can be disabled
  21. 2012An underwater stretch is a sizing test for rank rotation
  22. 2015Rule-based ETF rotation as one testable procedure
  23. 2015MACD crossover evaluation by trend rank rotation
  24. 2015Persistence and strength as one close-to-close switch
  25. 2015Evaluating rank rotation after a persistence screen
  26. 2016Evaluating an annual valuation rank rotation
  27. 2017A two-step yield and price rank rotation for a five-name sleeve
  28. 2018Smoothed volatility and the missing rank-rotation exit
  29. 2018A five-condition scorecard that ranks stocks and can refuse the trade
  30. 2018Small-cap growth sleeve eligibility with trend and rank rotation
  31. 2018Evaluating rank-rotation momentum across fund wrappers
  32. 2019Evaluating an annual equity-gold momentum rank rotation
  33. 2019Evaluating equity-gold momentum on funds versus indexes
  34. 2020How a signed comparative-strength oscillator is built for rank rotation
  35. 2020Which calendar clock changes a gold-versus-equity rotation test
  36. 2020Four-dimension relative strength as rank rotation
  37. 2020Portfolio construction as a ranked relative-strength problem
  38. 2020Two clocks for a Nasdaq put/call sleeve
All 50 readings tagged Rank rotation
Also on Rank rotation5 readings