Skip to main content
Track Rank rotation
21 / 38
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

2012issue C0610-11

An underwater stretch is a sizing test for rank rotation

A reader asked whether a severe interim setback made a modified high-yield rank-rotation procedure worth continuing. The author treated one large calendar-year decline, and the underwater-stretch that followed, as the harder holdability problem, then still kept the sleeve as one tested procedure among others.

  • A worst-year-critique of rank-rotation is a holdability question: whether the rules can still be executed after a severe interim setback.
  • The author treated a long underwater-stretch after one large calendar-year decline as more troubling than several smaller losing years in the same window.
  • System-diversification was the stated construction view: keep the modified sleeve as one tested procedure, not as a sole allocation.
  • Editorial reading: decide in advance whether the sleeve is small enough, and paired with other tested procedures, to survive its worst sample path.
Entries in this reading1 entry
Current trackRank rotation50 readings

A worst-year-critique of a rank-rotation sleeve

A reader critique of a modified high-yield rank-rotation procedure asked whether a severe interim setback made the rules worth continuing. Rank-rotation ranks a candidate universe and periodically reallocates toward the highest-ranked names under fixed entry, exit, and holding rules.

The procedure's author treated several smaller losing years inside a long sample window as less decisive than one much larger calendar-year decline. That larger decline left the procedure in an underwater-stretch after years of following the rules, which the author identified as the more troubling result. Holdability is whether the rule set can still be executed after a severe interim setback, not merely whether the full sample looked acceptable.

Why the author still kept the sleeve

The author used a gold-market indicator with a long unrewarding stretch as an analogy for staying with a tested procedure through a long dry spell. The author argued that abandoning the modified procedure after the large-decline year would have excluded the later recovery years in the same sample.

The author's stated construction view was to follow tested procedures and to allocate across more than one of them, because no single system works all of the time. That is system-diversification: spreading capital across more than one tested procedure so that one sleeve's dry spell does not decide the whole book. After that reflection, the author still judged the modified rank-rotation sleeve worth adding as one more tested procedure rather than as a sole allocation.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
21 of 38 in the Rank rotation track
201536-41 pp.Next on Rank rotationRule-based ETF rotation as one testable procedureAfter two large equity drawdowns in one decade, the case study framed ETF construction as a mechanical, rules-based alternative to passive stock ownership.
All readings on this track · 38 readings
  1. 1987A mechanical rank-rotation sleeve for monthly fund leaders
  2. 1989Rank rotation in a five-name no-load sleeve
  3. 1990Cycle-tested five-year fund rank rotation
  4. 1991Blue-chip rank rotation by relative-strength-index slope
  5. 1992Currency rank rotation and intermarket timing
  6. 1992Rank rotation and relative strength for portfolio construction
  7. 1994MACD crossovers then short-horizon rank rotation
  8. 1994A comparable group-trend ledger from published ranks
  9. 1997Normalized yield rank rotation as a full portfolio procedure
  10. 1997Constructing an investor preference index from two capitalization-weighted series
  11. 1998Constructing anchored momentum from a centered average
  12. 2000Rank rotation, a stop-loss order, and Relative Strength Index in fund switching
  13. 2003A one-fund daily rank is a two-sleeve construction problem
  14. 2004Evaluate rank rotation only where persistence already exists
  15. 2004Sector fund rank rotation with regression and trailing stops
  16. 2006Evaluating equal-weight annual yield-rank rotation
  17. 2007Weekly preferred-symbol reselection for mechanical trend systems
  18. 2011Portfolio capacity and entry pacing for mechanical systems
  19. 2011Rank rotation as a testable ETF construction procedure
  20. 2011The inverse-Fisher stochastic is a forecast layer until the book rules can be disabled
  21. 2012An underwater stretch is a sizing test for rank rotation
  22. 2015Rule-based ETF rotation as one testable procedure
  23. 2015MACD crossover evaluation by trend rank rotation
  24. 2015Persistence and strength as one close-to-close switch
  25. 2015Evaluating rank rotation after a persistence screen
  26. 2016Evaluating an annual valuation rank rotation
  27. 2017A two-step yield and price rank rotation for a five-name sleeve
  28. 2018Smoothed volatility and the missing rank-rotation exit
  29. 2018A five-condition scorecard that ranks stocks and can refuse the trade
  30. 2018Small-cap growth sleeve eligibility with trend and rank rotation
  31. 2018Evaluating rank-rotation momentum across fund wrappers
  32. 2019Evaluating an annual equity-gold momentum rank rotation
  33. 2019Evaluating equity-gold momentum on funds versus indexes
  34. 2020How a signed comparative-strength oscillator is built for rank rotation
  35. 2020Which calendar clock changes a gold-versus-equity rotation test
  36. 2020Four-dimension relative strength as rank rotation
  37. 2020Portfolio construction as a ranked relative-strength problem
  38. 2020Two clocks for a Nasdaq put/call sleeve
By fieldPortfolio construction38 readingsBy year20127 readings
All 50 readings tagged Rank rotation
Also on Rank rotation5 readings
1987A mechanical rank-rotation sleeve for monthly fund leaders1989Rank rotation in a five-name no-load sleeve1990Cycle-tested five-year fund rank rotation1991Blue-chip rank rotation by relative-strength-index slope1992Currency rank rotation and intermarket timing