2001issue C081-6
Know Sure Thing with stacked horizons and trendline confirmation
Know Sure Thing (KST) turns four smoothed, weighted rate-of-change windows into one momentum composite for judging trend direction and maturity. The historical teaching rule requires agreement among short-term, intermediate, and long-term KST readings and a matching price-chart signal.
- The market-cycle model treats short-term, intermediate, and primary trends as concurrent swings that should be aligned before a trade is taken.
- KST is built from four rate-of-change series that are smoothed, weighted by horizon, and summed into one composite, which is presented as more informative than stacking same-length momentum oscillators.
- A valid setup requires agreement among short-term, intermediate, and long-term KST readings plus a matching price-chart signal.
- In a strong linear trend, long-horizon KST can flip while price never breaks its trendline, and those unconfirmed reversals were treated as false.
This archive article walks through a historical workflow for judging trend direction and maturity. Four rate-of-change series are smoothed, weighted, and summed into one Know Sure Thing (KST) composite. Action is withheld until short-term, intermediate, and long-term KST readings agree and a matching price-chart signal appears.
Three concurrent trends in the market-cycle model
A market-cycle model treats three concurrent trends as having different typical durations. The short-term swing lasts about three to six weeks. The intermediate swing lasts about six weeks to nine months. The primary trend lasts about nine months to two years, with a usual span of 12 to 18 months and rare cases as short as six months or as long as three years.
These nested swings run together. The historical workflow asks that they be aligned before a trade is taken. The primary trend is the longest listed swing and sets the preferred trade direction.
Positioning with the primary trend
Positioning with the primary trend and avoiding its terminal phase is presented as the core risk-control idea. Early bull-market participation is described as more favorable than late-stage participation. Counter-trend intermediate swings are described as less favorable than with-trend ones.
How Know Sure Thing is constructed
Know Sure Thing is a weighted, smoothed composite of several rate-of-change series used to judge trend direction and maturity. Rate-of-change is the percentage change of the close versus a prior close, recentered so zero is the midpoint of the oscillator.
KST is constructed by computing four rate-of-change series, smoothing each with a simple or exponential moving average, multiplying each smoothed series by a horizon-specific weight, and summing the weighted terms into one momentum composite.
The supplied short-term daily KST parameter set uses rate-of-change lengths 10, 15, 20, and 30 with moving-average lengths 10, 10, 10, and 15 and weights 1, 2, 3, and 4.
A worked short-term weekly example recenters each rate of change as close divided by the close n periods earlier, times 100, minus 100, then applies exponential smoothing with alpha equal to 2 divided by n plus 1.
Several windows versus same-length oscillators
Using several rate-of-change windows is presented as more informative than stacking same-length momentum oscillators. Same-length series are highly correlated, and a lone short window can miss larger cycles that may reverse first.
Agreement plus trendline confirmation
The teaching rule is to require agreement among short-term, intermediate, and long-term KST readings and a matching price-chart signal. In the illustrated case, a long-term bull reading, a short-term rally reading, an intermediate buy reading, and a later price buy signal lined up.
Trendline confirmation is the price-structure rule that a KST buy or sell is valid only after price breaks or holds a drawn trendline in the same direction.
Unconfirmed reversals in a linear trend
KST can issue unconfirmed reversal signals in strong linear trends. A linear-trend false signal is a strong one-way price path in which the long-horizon KST can flip while price never confirms the reversal. In the S&P 500 example, long-term sell readings were treated as false because price never broke its rising trendline.
Long-term KST on Abbott Laboratories, 1986–2000

The source long-term weekly KST uses 39-, 52-, 78- and 104-week ROC windows, EMA smoothing, and weights 1, 2, 3 and 4. The dashed series is the 26-week EMA used for reversal crosses. End-of-chart KST is printed as -57.66.
All readings on this track · 46 readings
- 1985Constructing excess and momentum difference-curve oscillators
- 1988Five reading rules for smoothed indicator charts
- 1989Momentum overlays that speed moving-average oscillators
- 1990A laboratory template that constructs Rate of Change as a pane module
- 1991Volume-scaled rate of change as a momentum construction
- 1991Three-indicator market overview from tape, sentiment and rates
- 1991Three-component trend model with rate-of-change filters
- 1992A KST oscillator from a weighted rate-of-change stack
- 1992Four-window weighted rate-of-change composite
- 1992Constructing multi-span smoothed rate-of-change filters
- 1992Constructing a four-horizon summed rate of change
- 1992Constructing KST from four weighted smoothed rates of change
- 1992Constructing a composite from weighted smoothed rates of change
- 1992Three-horizon KST maturity alignment
- 1992Construct a bond-led dividend-to-bond-yield regime first
- 1992Constructing relative-strength KST from weighted rate-of-change
- 1993Constructing a volume oscillator from average ratios and smoothed rate of change
- 1994Gold as a cycle clock for commodities and yields
- 1994Constructing a composite from weighted, smoothed rate-of-change windows
- 1994Constructing gold-mining rate-of-change tripwires for Treasury bonds
- 1994A capacity-stress checklist across commodities, bonds, and breadth
- 1994Rate of change parameters for testable entries
- 1994Constructing rate-of-change midpoints, lookbacks and divergence
- 1994Lead oscillator breaks need price trendline confirmation
- 1994Nested averages for an annual momentum curve
- 1994Evaluating a Coppock-style rate of change as a bottom-regime filter
- 1995A weighted eleven-month Dow rate of change as one testable timing procedure
- 1996Named lookbacks, thresholds, and streaks for entry rules
- 1997A midpoint rate-of-change test for bond trend follow-through
- 1997Constructing a short-rate-adjusted equity momentum filter
- 1998Daily momentum rank-churn as a portfolio-construction problem
- 1999Constructing a lagged rate of change cycle system
- 2000A triple delay line then a one-bar elliptic oscillator
- 2001Confirming rate of change divergences with price
- 2001Momentum trendline breaks need price confirmation
- 2001Market breadth, On-balance volume, and Rate of Change as a combined timing framework
- 2001Know Sure Thing with stacked horizons and trendline confirmation
- 2003Constructing a mechanical system from a rate of change condition
- 2003Constructing momentum from two closes and spotting divergence
- 2003Formula choice tilts which momentum mismatches count as divergences
- 2004RSI and momentum agreement as an asymmetric filter
- 2005Constructing price-normalized moving-slope hybrids
- 2005Unsigned speed gates on a fixed average-cross pair
- 2007Rebuilding rate of change as a path-weighted oscillator
- 2008Construct Special K so short-horizon signals stay inside the primary trend
- 2013Restore volume balance before adding another price-time indicator