Skip to main content
Track Linear regression
20 / 43
Library

1995issue C051-8

Linear baseline holdout checks for annual bill-rate forecasts

Candidate predictors for three-month bill yields were screened for lead, then a lagged linear mapping from ordered indicator history forecast the next year's average bill rate. Accuracy was read after a chronological holdout split, with a survey consensus and a futures-implied reading lined up on the same one-year horizon.

  • Many financial price and rate series moved with three-month bill yields, so they behaved as coincident series and supplied little lead.
  • Three composite leading-indicator series plus a money-supply series were retained because they often turned before bill yields, yet lead-lag correlation showed only a weak-to-moderate leading association.
  • A linear mapping used ordered indicator history from a bounded lookback to produce the next year's average bill rate, and fitting stopped at a preset residual tolerance rather than a trading objective.
  • Accuracy was read on a chronological out-of-sample window, and the same one-year horizon lined up the quantitative forecast with a survey consensus and a futures-implied reading.
Entries in this reading1 entry

Screening for a usable lead

When candidate predictors for three-month bill yields were screened, many financial price and rate series moved with the target and therefore supplied little lead. Those readings are coincident series: they track the target at the same time and cannot supply a usable lead.

A leading indicator tends to change direction before the target yield rather than moving with it or after it. Three composite leading-indicator series plus a money-supply series were retained because they often turned before bill yields.

Lead-lag correlation charts showed only a weak-to-moderate leading association between those retained indicators and current bill rates.

Cross-correlation of LEI with 91-day T-bill rates

Bars show the cross-correlation of the leading-indicator series (indicator 1) with 91-day bill yields from a 25-period lag through a 25-period lead. Correlation stays strong on the lag side and fades through lead time, which is the screening evidence that past indicator readings can feed a one-year linear forecast. Values were read off the NeuroForecaster correlation grid, not from a printed table.
Bars show the cross-correlation of the leading-indicator series (indicator 1) with 91-day bill yields from a 25-period lag through a 25-period lead. Correlation stays strong on the lag side and fades through lead time, which is the screening evidence that past indicator readings can feed a one-year linear forecast. Values were read off the NeuroForecaster correlation grid, not from a printed table.91-day Treasury bill · annual

Heights are approximate readings from the printed 0.2-grid; NeuroForecaster did not print numeric correlation values.

A lagged linear mapping with a bounded lookback

The fitted mapping used ordered indicator history from the prior four years to produce the next year's average bill rate. Linear regression here is a fitted linear mapping from those lagged, ordered observations to a single-horizon forecast.

The lookback is the fixed span of past indicator readings supplied as inputs for one forecast. The annual-average horizon is a one-year sampling interval in which the target is the coming year's average short-term bill rate.

Training windows were rolled forward year by year, and older observations were later dropped so the lookback stayed bounded. Fitting stopped when residual learning error reached a preset tolerance, which is an in-sample stopping rule rather than a trading objective.

Holdout accuracy at a shared one-year horizon

Accuracy was read on observations after a chronological holdout split, not only on the sample used to fit the mapping. That reserved stretch is the out-of-sample window, so forecast error is scored on data the mapping was not trained on.

Absolute forecast error, the unsigned gap between a one-year-ahead estimate and the realized average rate, is used only as an evaluation metric.

The same one-year horizon was used to line up a survey consensus, a futures-implied reading, and the quantitative forecast.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
20 of 43 in the Linear regression track
19951-2 pp.Next on Linear regressionProjection bands from high and low regression slopesThe high-side slope and the low-side slope are estimated separately over the same 14-bar lookback window by regressing highs and lows against sequential bar numbers.
All readings on this track · 43 readings
  1. 1990Constructing dollar baselines from rates, inflation, and residuals
  2. 1990Constructing a nominal index value from forward earnings and fitted yield
  3. 1990Constructing a nominal index price from earnings and a fitted yield
  4. 1990Endpoint-pinned price paths are not forecasts
  5. 1990Constructing least-squares polynomial smoothers
  6. 1991Endpoint growth rates versus linear-regression consistency
  7. 1991Out-of-sample checks for linear growth fits
  8. 1991Trend as persistence, not a straight line
  9. 1991Quadratic trend, residual oscillator, and a secondary cycle calendar
  10. 1991Time-origin offset and residual-price divergence on a quadratic least-squares fit
  11. 1991A least-squares trendline from ordered prices
  12. 1992Constructing log-linear growth and reliability screens
  13. 1992Constructing log-linear growth-rate baselines
  14. 1992Next-session high, low, and close from rolling linear regression
  15. 1993Auditing an index price-earnings multiple with short-rate regression
  16. 1994Regression-seeded nested exponential price filter
  17. 1994Constructing the double exponential average from lag cancellation
  18. 1994Evaluating money supply as a linear leading-index baseline
  19. 1995Constructing least-squares trend channels
  20. 1995Linear baseline holdout checks for annual bill-rate forecasts
  21. 1995Projection bands from high and low regression slopes
  22. 1995Evaluating a least-squares end-point moving average on a known test series
  23. 1996Constructing an endpoint moving average from a least-squares line
  24. 1996Scoring equity path consistency with a k-ratio overlay
  25. 1996Evaluating month-end yield gaps for equity regimes
  26. 1996Constructing session-indexed standard error bands
  27. 1998Evaluating linear regression baselines for index valuation
  28. 1998R-squared as a two-state trend filter from a price-time fit
  29. 2000Second-order moving-average lag correction
  30. 2002Price regression line versus beta for index tracking
  31. 2003Regression slope with an r-squared trend confidence gate
  32. 2003Constructing finite-volume-element divergence with slope comparison
  33. 2004Building a daily score from regression, retracement, and volume
  34. 2004Constructing least-squares trendlines from ordered prices
  35. 2007Rectangle breakout targets beyond height
  36. 2007Confirming a price trend with regression slope and r-squared
  37. 2008A linear-regression angle assembled as one trend filter
  38. 2010A two-state swing machine from four running extremes
  39. 2016Score oil-complex tightness before divergence or regression
  40. 2017Nikkei-yen intermarket divergence as a regime case study
  41. 2017Constructing Calmar ratio and linear regression baselines
  42. 2019Pair-trade layer construction versus average-spread management
  43. 2020A convolution slope built from nested linear regression
All 112 readings tagged Linear regression
Also on Linear regression5 readings