2007issue C121-9
Confirming a price trend with regression slope and r-squared
Fit a least-squares line to a fixed lookback of closes, then confirm it with signed slope and an r-squared gate. Keep a same-length moving average as the control, not as a rival forecast.
- A least-squares line on a fixed lookback of closes reduces bar-to-bar noise and serves as a price-trend baseline.
- Confirmation is assembled from the regression value, the signed slope, and r-squared against the same series.
- A higher r-squared means the line tracks the trending component more closely; lookback sets the confirmation gate.
- A same-length moving average is the control comparison, not a second forecast engine.
A quieter price-trend baseline
A least-squares line fitted to a fixed lookback of closes is constructed to reduce bar-to-bar noise and serve as a price-trend baseline.
That line is a least-squares best-fit through a fixed lookback of ordered closes. It is used as a lower-lag trend baseline than a moving average of the same length.
Three readings for confirmation
Trend confirmation is assembled from three platform functions: the regression value, the signed slope of that line, and r-squared against the underlying series.
R-squared is the share of price variation explained by the regression line over the same lookback. A higher reading means the line tracks the trending component more closely. A user threshold decides when the fit is strong enough to treat the slope as confirmation.
Reading slope apart from the overlay
Slope is plotted as its own series and recolored when it crosses zero so direction is read independently of the price overlay. Above zero marks upward direction and below zero marks downward direction.
An r-squared gate set by lookback
Lookback is the user-chosen bar count that sets both the regression window and the numeric level at which r-squared is treated as meaningful. The lookback length sets the level at which r-squared is treated as a confirmation gate. A default construction uses length 20 with a 0.2 threshold.
A conventional chart as a check
A two-line moving average and a stochastic oscillator are shown on the same daily chart so the regression stack can be checked against a conventional trend-and-momentum layout.
Coding the line without a library
A closed-form 10-bar construction recovers slope from weighted closes and the same-length moving average. The regression line can then be coded as an overlay plus a lower-pane slope without a built-in library.
Editorial assembly
Editorial. Fit the line first, read the signed slope for direction, then apply the r-squared gate before treating that slope as confirmation. Leave the same-length moving average in place as the control so the overlay is judged against a familiar baseline, not treated as a rival forecast.
All readings on this track · 43 readings
- 1990Constructing dollar baselines from rates, inflation, and residuals
- 1990Constructing a nominal index value from forward earnings and fitted yield
- 1990Constructing a nominal index price from earnings and a fitted yield
- 1990Endpoint-pinned price paths are not forecasts
- 1990Constructing least-squares polynomial smoothers
- 1991Endpoint growth rates versus linear-regression consistency
- 1991Out-of-sample checks for linear growth fits
- 1991Trend as persistence, not a straight line
- 1991Quadratic trend, residual oscillator, and a secondary cycle calendar
- 1991Time-origin offset and residual-price divergence on a quadratic least-squares fit
- 1991A least-squares trendline from ordered prices
- 1992Constructing log-linear growth and reliability screens
- 1992Constructing log-linear growth-rate baselines
- 1992Next-session high, low, and close from rolling linear regression
- 1993Auditing an index price-earnings multiple with short-rate regression
- 1994Regression-seeded nested exponential price filter
- 1994Constructing the double exponential average from lag cancellation
- 1994Evaluating money supply as a linear leading-index baseline
- 1995Constructing least-squares trend channels
- 1995Linear baseline holdout checks for annual bill-rate forecasts
- 1995Projection bands from high and low regression slopes
- 1995Evaluating a least-squares end-point moving average on a known test series
- 1996Constructing an endpoint moving average from a least-squares line
- 1996Scoring equity path consistency with a k-ratio overlay
- 1996Evaluating month-end yield gaps for equity regimes
- 1996Constructing session-indexed standard error bands
- 1998Evaluating linear regression baselines for index valuation
- 1998R-squared as a two-state trend filter from a price-time fit
- 2000Second-order moving-average lag correction
- 2002Price regression line versus beta for index tracking
- 2003Regression slope with an r-squared trend confidence gate
- 2003Constructing finite-volume-element divergence with slope comparison
- 2004Building a daily score from regression, retracement, and volume
- 2004Constructing least-squares trendlines from ordered prices
- 2007Rectangle breakout targets beyond height
- 2007Confirming a price trend with regression slope and r-squared
- 2008A linear-regression angle assembled as one trend filter
- 2010A two-state swing machine from four running extremes
- 2016Score oil-complex tightness before divergence or regression
- 2017Nikkei-yen intermarket divergence as a regime case study
- 2017Constructing Calmar ratio and linear regression baselines
- 2019Pair-trade layer construction versus average-spread management
- 2020A convolution slope built from nested linear regression