1992issue C041-5
Daily closing-trin extremes and next-day direction
A 435-day historical review treated the daily closing-trin as informative for next-session direction only at rare extreme-tails. Editorial reading: count how often those tails appear, then treat the mid-range as silence rather than a weaker daily compass.
- The closing-trin restates the daily breadth-volume print as average declining volume divided by average advancing volume, so a bearish-high-print is read as bearish and a bullish-low-print as bullish.
- In that review, closes at or below 0.4 were the only low band treated as bullish, while a bearish reading was described as requiring about 2.3 or higher and next-day weakness was associated with closes above 2.4.
- Those extreme-tails were rare: four of 435 days closed at or below 0.4, and three closed above 2.4. After the sub-0.4 closes, the industrial average advanced on 75 percent of the following days in the sample.
- Editorial reading: run the next-session-check only at those rare extremes, and treat mid-range closes as silence rather than a weaker version of the same next-day hypothesis.
What the closing print measures
The closing-trin is the end-of-day breadth-volume ratio restated as average volume on declining issues divided by average volume on advancing issues. It is a market-breadth measure: it tracks participation of advancing versus declining issues and the volume attached to each side, as distinct from the level of a price average.
Under that construction, a high close is a bearish-high-print, conventionally read as selling pressure outweighing buying pressure. A low close is a bullish-low-print, conventionally read as buying pressure outweighing selling pressure.
What the historical review treated as directional
A historical review of 435 trading days tabulated the next-session-check, meaning whether a major industrial average advanced or declined on the day after the closing print, across various closing levels of the index.
In that review, closes at or below 0.4 were the only low band treated as bullish. Closes above 0.4 were described as noncommittal. High-side next-day weakness was associated with closes above 2.4, and a bearish reading was described as requiring about 2.3 or higher.
Those bands are the extreme-tails: a close near or below 0.4, or near or above 2.3. They were the only bands the historical review treated as directional.
How often the extreme-tails appeared
Only four of the 435 days closed at or below 0.4. After those sub-0.4 closes, the industrial average advanced on 75 percent of the following days in the sample. Only three of the 435 days closed above 2.4.
The stated conclusion is that the simple daily close was treated as informative for next-day direction only at those rare high and low extremes.
All readings on this track · 71 readings
- 1987How a failed rebound, weak breadth, and cycle dates broke the 1987 bull case
- 1988Diagnosing market bottoms with breadth, divergence and averages
- 1988Diagnosing index tops with breadth divergences
- 1988Record highs versus seven-day breadth and divergence
- 1989Constructing a percentage-scaled internals composite
- 1989Constructing a weekly block-tick breadth z-score
- 1989Constructing a dual-rate advance-decline oscillator
- 1989Normalize advance-decline series for a common-scale comparison
- 1990Unchanged-issue share as a narrow-breadth case study
- 1990Evaluating daily and weekly unsigned plurality breadth
- 1990Constructing paired new-high and new-low breadth indicators
- 1990Ten-day HI/LO extremes as a long-horizon breadth signal
- 1990Confirming index cycles with breadth, volume, and waves
- 1990Index cycle gates from breadth and volume
- 1990Constructing advance-decline breadth indicators
- 1990Weekly advance-decline oscillator: weight map, extremes, and spike cycle
- 1990Price-weighted construction distorts breadth, support, and trend
- 1991A peak-sequence test from the new-highs-to-advances-ratio
- 1991Fuzzy rules that turn daily market-breadth into a session consensus
- 1991From daily breadth tallies to a weighted consensus signal
- 1991Retesting market-breadth when market structure changes
- 1991Constructing TRIN as a breadth-volume ratio
- 1991Build the market clock before you read a price bar
- 1991A construction audit of the long-horizon trading index
- 1991Independent formula timers kept as a testable combination
- 1992When identical TRIN prints come from different pairings
- 1992Grade closing tick before a next-session breadth hypothesis
- 1992Noncumulative advance-decline swing confirmation
- 1992Five-day sum construction of the trading index
- 1992Daily closing-trin extremes and next-day direction
- 1992A three-layer audit: regime, breadth, and group RSI
- 1992Constructing a nine-state trend, momentum, and breadth score
- 1993Constructing a market-volume-impact rating from nested averages
- 1993When advance-decline confirmation counts the wrong universe
- 1993Constructing breadth momentum from advance-decline smoothing
- 1993Constructing a cumulative market-thrust line
- 1994Three-horizon construction of the Haurlan index
- 1994Checklist-gated session entry in 1993 index futures
- 1994Read one advance-decline pair through three windows
- 1994Constructing calibrated market-breadth summation indexes
- 1994Constructing a two-speed advance-decline oscillator and a calibrated summation
- 1995NYSE tick extremes and candlestick reversal entries
- 1995Assembling range, breadth, and a stored stop into one procedure
- 1995Restating market breadth timing rules as ratios
- 1995Constructing breadth ratio gates after lookback drawdowns
- 1995Building a short-range breadth and price oscillator
- 1996Constructing a smoothed advance-decline trend filter
- 1996Smoothed advance-decline alerts at the 1987 and 1990 turning points
- 1996Constructing breadth, RSI, and stochastic range filters
- 1996New-high and new-low counts as a breadth construction
- 1996Constructing the four-input breadth-volume ratio
- 1996Constructing the McClellan oscillator and a calibrated summation index
- 1996Declare the oscillator seed, then calibrate only the summation index
- 1997Three-gate centered strength in market-breadth construction
- 1997Daily advance-decline and new-high new-low breadth signals
- 1999Index-fund positions as a majority-vote committee
- 2000Tick, tiki and TRIN as a three-layer session confirmation stack
- 2000Constructing an advance-decline oscillator from one listed tape
- 2001Market breadth, beta, and volume-price confirmation
- 2001Regime context from relative venue volume, breadth, and intermarket spreads
- 2002When NYSE breadth misreads operating-stock participation
- 2003Two-gate breadth divergence and a trend filter for rally tops
- 2003Market internals confirm or diverge from the index
- 2004Constructing the McClellan oscillator and summation index
- 2005Intraday index-futures divergence as a three-part session hypothesis
- 2005Breadth summation levels as a short-term signal filter
- 2005Checking trend versus range with breadth and divergence
- 2011Constructing a Nasdaq hi-lo index from highs, lows, and issues traded
- 2013Cumulative advance-decline versus a one-year average
- 2013A one-year breadth average as a participation gate
- 2015Falsifying a healthy correction with breadth and support