Skip to main content
Track Market breadth
15 / 71
Library

1990issue C071-9

Constructing advance-decline breadth indicators

Hold the same daily advance, decline, and unchanged counts fixed, then change only one design lever at a time. Difference versus ratio, the denominator, and the smoother each produce a different participation claim.

  • Every advance-decline series starts from the same three closing-price states: an issue can finish higher, lower, or unchanged.
  • Difference constructions and ratio constructions are separate families; the denominator and the smoother change what the line can claim.
  • A mismatch between a breadth trend and a price index is a participation hypothesis that often fails, not a finished signal.
  • Extreme readings belong to one formula-and-smoother pair. Study at least six months of the chosen series and start with longer trendlines.
Entries in this reading1 entry

Three daily closing-price states

Every advance-decline construction is assembled from three daily closing-price states: an issue can advance, decline, or remain unchanged. Those three outcomes are the advance-decline components of the series.

Standalone advance and decline counts are treated as weakly informative. Constructions therefore compare those counts rather than reading either total on its own.

Difference constructions and ratio constructions

With the daily counts held fixed, constructions fall into two families: difference formulas and ratio formulas. Each family ranges from one-step to multi-step designs.

A difference construction starts from the signed or unsigned gap between advancing and declining issues. A ratio construction scales a count or a difference by declines, by advances plus declines, by unchanged issues, or by all issues traded.

What belongs in the denominator

Ratio constructions change meaning when the denominator changes from declines only, to advances plus declines, to all issues including unchanged.

One variant places a 30-day average of advances over a 30-day average of declines rather than averaging the daily ratio itself.

Hybrid constructions divide the signed or absolute advance-decline gap by unchanged issues or by total issues traded. Another form accumulates a square-root transform of advance-to-unchanged versus decline-to-unchanged ratios. Another sums a weekly difference-over-unchanged series and compares it with a price index by regression.

Smoothing and running sums

Nearly every construction is then smoothed. Breadth smoothing is a simple or recency-weighted moving average, or a running sum, applied so noisy daily counts can be read as internal trend. The smoother is defined by lookback length and by whether recent observations receive extra weight. Shorter recency-weighted averages are described as the most sensitive to turns lasting days or at most weeks.

A running sum of daily advances minus declines is offered as an alternative to moving-average smoothing. Because the plotted level depends on the start date, only slope, momentum, and comparison with the prevailing price trend are treated as meaningful.

One difference-family oscillator is defined as the 19-day exponential average of advances minus declines minus the 39-day exponential average of the same series, using 10 percent and 5 percent smoothing factors. A companion series is formed by accumulating the daily oscillator values.

Participation and formula-specific scale

A falling breadth trend against a rising price index is framed as fewer issues supporting the advance. A rising breadth trend against a falling index is framed as fewer issues supporting the decline. Both are treated as change-of-trend hypotheses that often fail.

Extreme-zone readings, when used, are not universal. Each formula-and-smoother pair produces its own scale. Values near zero are typically treated as indeterminate.

Procedural selection, not a preferred formula

Selection guidance is procedural rather than a single preferred formula. Use counts that are obtainable, study at least six months of the chosen series, begin with longer trendlines rather than extreme levels, and treat breadth as a supplement to an independent reading of price-trend direction and maturity.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
15 of 71 in the Market breadth track
19901-3 pp.Next on Market breadthWeekly advance-decline oscillator: weight map, extremes, and spike cycleThe weekly advance-decline oscillator is the difference between a 40% exponential and a 22% exponential of weekly advancing minus declining issues.
All readings on this track · 71 readings
  1. 1987How a failed rebound, weak breadth, and cycle dates broke the 1987 bull case
  2. 1988Diagnosing market bottoms with breadth, divergence and averages
  3. 1988Diagnosing index tops with breadth divergences
  4. 1988Record highs versus seven-day breadth and divergence
  5. 1989Constructing a percentage-scaled internals composite
  6. 1989Constructing a weekly block-tick breadth z-score
  7. 1989Constructing a dual-rate advance-decline oscillator
  8. 1989Normalize advance-decline series for a common-scale comparison
  9. 1990Unchanged-issue share as a narrow-breadth case study
  10. 1990Evaluating daily and weekly unsigned plurality breadth
  11. 1990Constructing paired new-high and new-low breadth indicators
  12. 1990Ten-day HI/LO extremes as a long-horizon breadth signal
  13. 1990Confirming index cycles with breadth, volume, and waves
  14. 1990Index cycle gates from breadth and volume
  15. 1990Constructing advance-decline breadth indicators
  16. 1990Weekly advance-decline oscillator: weight map, extremes, and spike cycle
  17. 1990Price-weighted construction distorts breadth, support, and trend
  18. 1991A peak-sequence test from the new-highs-to-advances-ratio
  19. 1991Fuzzy rules that turn daily market-breadth into a session consensus
  20. 1991From daily breadth tallies to a weighted consensus signal
  21. 1991Retesting market-breadth when market structure changes
  22. 1991Constructing TRIN as a breadth-volume ratio
  23. 1991Build the market clock before you read a price bar
  24. 1991A construction audit of the long-horizon trading index
  25. 1991Independent formula timers kept as a testable combination
  26. 1992When identical TRIN prints come from different pairings
  27. 1992Grade closing tick before a next-session breadth hypothesis
  28. 1992Noncumulative advance-decline swing confirmation
  29. 1992Five-day sum construction of the trading index
  30. 1992Daily closing-trin extremes and next-day direction
  31. 1992A three-layer audit: regime, breadth, and group RSI
  32. 1992Constructing a nine-state trend, momentum, and breadth score
  33. 1993Constructing a market-volume-impact rating from nested averages
  34. 1993When advance-decline confirmation counts the wrong universe
  35. 1993Constructing breadth momentum from advance-decline smoothing
  36. 1993Constructing a cumulative market-thrust line
  37. 1994Three-horizon construction of the Haurlan index
  38. 1994Checklist-gated session entry in 1993 index futures
  39. 1994Read one advance-decline pair through three windows
  40. 1994Constructing calibrated market-breadth summation indexes
  41. 1994Constructing a two-speed advance-decline oscillator and a calibrated summation
  42. 1995NYSE tick extremes and candlestick reversal entries
  43. 1995Assembling range, breadth, and a stored stop into one procedure
  44. 1995Restating market breadth timing rules as ratios
  45. 1995Constructing breadth ratio gates after lookback drawdowns
  46. 1995Building a short-range breadth and price oscillator
  47. 1996Constructing a smoothed advance-decline trend filter
  48. 1996Smoothed advance-decline alerts at the 1987 and 1990 turning points
  49. 1996Constructing breadth, RSI, and stochastic range filters
  50. 1996New-high and new-low counts as a breadth construction
  51. 1996Constructing the four-input breadth-volume ratio
  52. 1996Constructing the McClellan oscillator and a calibrated summation index
  53. 1996Declare the oscillator seed, then calibrate only the summation index
  54. 1997Three-gate centered strength in market-breadth construction
  55. 1997Daily advance-decline and new-high new-low breadth signals
  56. 1999Index-fund positions as a majority-vote committee
  57. 2000Tick, tiki and TRIN as a three-layer session confirmation stack
  58. 2000Constructing an advance-decline oscillator from one listed tape
  59. 2001Market breadth, beta, and volume-price confirmation
  60. 2001Regime context from relative venue volume, breadth, and intermarket spreads
  61. 2002When NYSE breadth misreads operating-stock participation
  62. 2003Two-gate breadth divergence and a trend filter for rally tops
  63. 2003Market internals confirm or diverge from the index
  64. 2004Constructing the McClellan oscillator and summation index
  65. 2005Intraday index-futures divergence as a three-part session hypothesis
  66. 2005Breadth summation levels as a short-term signal filter
  67. 2005Checking trend versus range with breadth and divergence
  68. 2011Constructing a Nasdaq hi-lo index from highs, lows, and issues traded
  69. 2013Cumulative advance-decline versus a one-year average
  70. 2013A one-year breadth average as a participation gate
  71. 2015Falsifying a healthy correction with breadth and support
All 120 readings tagged Market breadth
Also on Market breadth5 readings