1991issue C041
From daily breadth tallies to a weighted consensus signal
The historical workflow starts from six daily tape counts, builds signed breadth pressure, keeps an exponentially smoothed advance/decline slope as a second baseline, and scores twenty overlapping rules into one consensus figure. Editorial reading: treat that figure as a falsifiable chart hypothesis, not as a single-ratio call.
- Market breadth here is the six daily tape counts of new highs, new lows, advances, declines, advancing volume, and declining volume, not a finished ratio on its own.
- A volume-weighted breadth ratio and an inverted companion become signed breadth pressure, meant to be largely positive in bullish sessions and largely negative in bearish sessions.
- Exponential smoothing with a constant of 0.4 is applied to the advance/decline-line slope so that slope can sit beside the pressure series as a second baseline.
- Twenty rules receive computational-fuzzification grades and a rule weight between +1 and -1; the consensus score is the sum of each fired rule's membership grade times its weight.
Start from the daily tape counts
The archive workflow does not begin with a finished breadth ratio. It starts from six daily tape counts: new highs, new lows, advances, declines, advancing volume, and declining volume. Those counts are the raw market-breadth structure. Later steps turn them into two series and then into a scored consensus.
TradersWeek editorial interpretation sits outside that workflow: keep the daily print as input, and treat the finished consensus as a falsifiable chart hypothesis rather than as a single-ratio call.
From counts to two ratios
A standard volume-weighted breadth ratio multiplies advances by declining volume and divides by the product of declines and advancing volume. The archive reading is below 1 in a rising session and above 1 in a falling session.
An inverted companion ratio multiplies advances by advancing volume and divides by the product of declines and declining volume. That companion sits near 0 when the standard ratio exceeds 1, and it exceeds 1 when the standard ratio is below 1.
Signed pressure and a smoothed slope
Subtracting the reciprocal of the companion ratio from the companion itself produces signed breadth pressure. The series is meant to be largely positive in bullish sessions and largely negative in bearish sessions.
A second series is the advance/decline-line slope after exponential smoothing with a constant of 0.4. Exponential smoothing here is a recursive average that applies that fixed constant to the newest observation so the slope can be compared on a defined sampling interval.
Rules, memberships, and a consensus score
Those statistics are interpreted through a knowledge base of 20 rules that encode standard readings of the same breadth information.
Crisp inputs are mapped by computational fuzzification onto seven primary fuzzy memberships from positive-big through negative-big, including a zero band. The mapping is computed rather than read from lookup tables of membership values. Composite memberships such as any, positive, negative, and selected logical combinations are derived from those seven primary memberships.
Each rule may carry a rule weight between +1 and -1. A weight of +1 marks a rule treated as fully forecast-capable. A weight of 0 marks a rule treated as having no forecast content. Positive weights mark bullish advice. Negative weights mark bearish advice.
A consensus score is the sum of each fired rule's fulfilment score, defined as that rule's membership grade times its weight.
Editorial reading: the overlapping memberships and signed weights are what turn the chart condition into a hypothesis that can be checked. A single volume-weighted breadth ratio is only one input to that check.
All readings on this track · 71 readings
- 1987How a failed rebound, weak breadth, and cycle dates broke the 1987 bull case
- 1988Diagnosing market bottoms with breadth, divergence and averages
- 1988Diagnosing index tops with breadth divergences
- 1988Record highs versus seven-day breadth and divergence
- 1989Constructing a percentage-scaled internals composite
- 1989Constructing a weekly block-tick breadth z-score
- 1989Constructing a dual-rate advance-decline oscillator
- 1989Normalize advance-decline series for a common-scale comparison
- 1990Unchanged-issue share as a narrow-breadth case study
- 1990Evaluating daily and weekly unsigned plurality breadth
- 1990Constructing paired new-high and new-low breadth indicators
- 1990Ten-day HI/LO extremes as a long-horizon breadth signal
- 1990Confirming index cycles with breadth, volume, and waves
- 1990Index cycle gates from breadth and volume
- 1990Constructing advance-decline breadth indicators
- 1990Weekly advance-decline oscillator: weight map, extremes, and spike cycle
- 1990Price-weighted construction distorts breadth, support, and trend
- 1991A peak-sequence test from the new-highs-to-advances-ratio
- 1991Fuzzy rules that turn daily market-breadth into a session consensus
- 1991From daily breadth tallies to a weighted consensus signal
- 1991Retesting market-breadth when market structure changes
- 1991Constructing TRIN as a breadth-volume ratio
- 1991Build the market clock before you read a price bar
- 1991A construction audit of the long-horizon trading index
- 1991Independent formula timers kept as a testable combination
- 1992When identical TRIN prints come from different pairings
- 1992Grade closing tick before a next-session breadth hypothesis
- 1992Noncumulative advance-decline swing confirmation
- 1992Five-day sum construction of the trading index
- 1992Daily closing-trin extremes and next-day direction
- 1992A three-layer audit: regime, breadth, and group RSI
- 1992Constructing a nine-state trend, momentum, and breadth score
- 1993Constructing a market-volume-impact rating from nested averages
- 1993When advance-decline confirmation counts the wrong universe
- 1993Constructing breadth momentum from advance-decline smoothing
- 1993Constructing a cumulative market-thrust line
- 1994Three-horizon construction of the Haurlan index
- 1994Checklist-gated session entry in 1993 index futures
- 1994Read one advance-decline pair through three windows
- 1994Constructing calibrated market-breadth summation indexes
- 1994Constructing a two-speed advance-decline oscillator and a calibrated summation
- 1995NYSE tick extremes and candlestick reversal entries
- 1995Assembling range, breadth, and a stored stop into one procedure
- 1995Restating market breadth timing rules as ratios
- 1995Constructing breadth ratio gates after lookback drawdowns
- 1995Building a short-range breadth and price oscillator
- 1996Constructing a smoothed advance-decline trend filter
- 1996Smoothed advance-decline alerts at the 1987 and 1990 turning points
- 1996Constructing breadth, RSI, and stochastic range filters
- 1996New-high and new-low counts as a breadth construction
- 1996Constructing the four-input breadth-volume ratio
- 1996Constructing the McClellan oscillator and a calibrated summation index
- 1996Declare the oscillator seed, then calibrate only the summation index
- 1997Three-gate centered strength in market-breadth construction
- 1997Daily advance-decline and new-high new-low breadth signals
- 1999Index-fund positions as a majority-vote committee
- 2000Tick, tiki and TRIN as a three-layer session confirmation stack
- 2000Constructing an advance-decline oscillator from one listed tape
- 2001Market breadth, beta, and volume-price confirmation
- 2001Regime context from relative venue volume, breadth, and intermarket spreads
- 2002When NYSE breadth misreads operating-stock participation
- 2003Two-gate breadth divergence and a trend filter for rally tops
- 2003Market internals confirm or diverge from the index
- 2004Constructing the McClellan oscillator and summation index
- 2005Intraday index-futures divergence as a three-part session hypothesis
- 2005Breadth summation levels as a short-term signal filter
- 2005Checking trend versus range with breadth and divergence
- 2011Constructing a Nasdaq hi-lo index from highs, lows, and issues traded
- 2013Cumulative advance-decline versus a one-year average
- 2013A one-year breadth average as a participation gate
- 2015Falsifying a healthy correction with breadth and support