2003issue C081
Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
A one-day reversal is constructed only after a trend is already in place. The session prints a sharp spike, then finishes with a marked move the other way, so the completed bar can be treated as a potential key reversal day rather than a confirmed turn.
- Confirm the prior trend before treating a single-session spike as a one-day reversal.
- A one-day reversal top closes near the session low after a rising trend. A one-day reversal bottom closes near the session high after a declining trend.
- The finished structure is only a potential key reversal day. Many one-day reversals are temporary pauses after which the existing trend continues.
- The same spike-and-close construction can appear as a one-week reversal on a weekly candlestick.
A one-day reversal is constructed when an instrument already in a trend prints a sharp spike and then reverses, finishing the session with a marked rise or drop. The completed one-day structure is treated as a potential key reversal day and can be built at either a top or a bottom.
Build the bar from a prior trend
Construction starts with that established trend. A single bar with a spike and an opposite close is not a one-day reversal unless the instrument is already trending.
Once the prior trend is in place, the session must print a sharp spike and then reverse, finishing with a marked rise or drop. That single-session sequence is the whole construction.
One-day reversal tops and bottoms
A one-day reversal top is identified in a rising trend by a single-day spike that then falls and closes near the session low.
A one-day reversal bottom is identified in a declining trend by a single-day spike that then rises and closes near the session high.
Read the finished bar as a candidate
The completed one-day structure is treated as a potential key reversal day. The pattern is described as occurring at the end of the trend, but many one-day reversals function only as temporary pauses, after which the existing trend continues.
The same construction can appear as a one-week reversal. In that reading, the spike-and-close is taken from a weekly candlestick instead of a daily bar.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
- 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
- 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
- 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
- 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
- 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
- 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
- 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
- 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
- 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
- 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
- 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
- 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
- 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
- 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
- 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
- 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
- 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
- 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
- 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
- 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
- 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
- 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
- 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
- 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
- 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
- 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
- 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
- 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
- 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
- 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
- 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
- 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
- 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
- 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
- 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
- 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
- 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
- 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
- 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
- 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
- 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
- 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
- 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
- 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
- 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
- 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
- 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
- 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
- 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
- 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
- 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
- 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
- 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
- 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops