Skip to main content
Track Candlestick patterns
29 / 54
Library

2008issue C101-5

Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation

A standard relative strength index averages up-close and down-close changes with one shared length and rescales relative strength onto a 0-100 oscillator. An asymmetrical RSI uses side-specific smoothing, which produced extra 30 and 70 swings and extra mismatches that were then accepted or rejected with candlestick confirmation and nearby structure.

  • The relative strength index splits one-bar close changes into up and down series, averages both sides, forms relative strength, and rescales that ratio onto a 0-100 oscillator.
  • In the standard construction both sides share one averaging length, so that length does not depend on how many bars in the window closed higher versus lower.
  • Asymmetrical RSI applies side-specific smoothing, which crossed the overbought-oversold bands more often and printed extra normal divergence and hidden divergence cases.
  • Those extra mismatches were kept or deferred only after candlestick confirmation against support, resistance, and trendline breaks.
Entries in this reading3 entries

One averaging length for both sides

The standard relative strength index splits one-bar close changes into an up series and a down series, averages each side, forms relative strength as the up average divided by the down average, and rescales that ratio onto a 0-100 oscillator.

In that construction both sides share one averaging length. The length is independent of how many bars in the window closed higher versus lower.

A 14-bar reading is treated as oversold below 30 and overbought above 70. Those overbought-oversold bands mark stretched oscillator extremes rather than standalone trade instructions. A mismatch between oscillator direction and price direction is presented as a primary use of the indicator.

Four specified mismatches

Four mismatch cases are specified. A higher oscillator low against a lower price low, and a lower oscillator high against a higher price high, are opposite swing extremes at the end of a decline or an advance. That pairing is normal divergence, read as a possible reversal condition.

A lower oscillator low against a higher price low after a pullback in an advance, and a higher oscillator high against a lower price high after a bounce in a decline, are labeled reverse or hidden. Hidden divergence is read as a possible continuation condition after a pullback or bounce inside an existing trend.

Side-specific smoothing

The asymmetrical RSI keeps the same 0-100 scale. Inside the chosen window it counts up-closes that are equal to or higher than the prior close, sets the down count as the window length minus that count, and smooths each side with an exponential average of twice its own count minus 1 before forming relative strength and the oscillator.

That is side-specific smoothing. The two sides no longer share one window.

Extra band swings as a checklist

On the illustrated comparison the asymmetrical 14-bar line crossed 70 and 30 more often than the standard 14-bar line, while the broad up and down swings stayed similar. The write-up treats that as earlier short-horizon turning-point visibility at the cost of a more volatile oscillator.

On a daily index comparison the asymmetrical line printed regular divergences that were absent or less distinct on the standard 14-bar line: lower oscillator highs against rising price, and higher oscillator lows against a new price low after a drop below 30.

The same index series also showed additional hidden mismatches, including lower oscillator lows against higher price lows after a mid-advance correction, which were not visible on the standard line.

The modification is described as usable on more than one time frame, with the largest visual gap versus the standard oscillator on daily and minute charts. An editorial view is that the extra 30 and 70 swings belong on a checklist of candidate divergences, not as standalone instructions.

Candlestick confirmation

In a multi-month equity walk-through, extra asymmetrical divergences were read only with candlestick reversal structures: doji, tweezer tops, evening star, morning star, and an engulfing that began with a doji. Those readings were taken together with support, resistance, and trendline breaks.

One clustered setup was still deferred because nearby resistance left an unfavorable distance from a support-based stop to the first overhead barrier.

HPQ daily price returning to the July shelf

Daily Hewlett-Packard closes wash out to a 10.8 shelf in late July, rally to about 15.3 by mid-August, then leak back toward that same shelf by mid-October. That return to nearby structure is the filter the article applies before an ARSI mismatch is accepted as a long. Closes were read from the published candlestick pane; the lower oscillator window did not reproduce usable RSI or ARSI traces.
Daily Hewlett-Packard closes wash out to a 10.8 shelf in late July, rally to about 15.3 by mid-August, then leak back toward that same shelf by mid-October. That return to nearby structure is the filter the article applies before an ARSI mismatch is accepted as a long. Closes were read from the published candlestick pane; the lower oscillator window did not reproduce usable RSI or ARSI traces.HPQ · daily · 2002-07-22T00:00:00.000Z to 2002-10-14T00:00:00.000Z

Digitized from daily candlesticks at roughly 0.1-dollar resolution. The pane prints month and day only; 2002 is the tape that matches these dollar levels and the session mark on 3 September after the Labor Day close. The red line sits near 10.8, a slightly lower shelf than the $11.90 support named in the text.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
29 of 54 in the Candlestick patterns track
20081-6 pp.Next on Candlestick patternsA permission checklist for the end of a trendFrame a completed trend as a five-wave impulse so the expected next structure is a three-wave correction that later filters can test.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
  1. 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
  2. 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
  3. 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
  4. 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
  5. 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
  6. 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
  7. 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
  8. 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
  9. 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
  10. 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
  11. 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
  12. 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
  13. 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
  14. 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
  15. 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
  16. 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
  17. 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
  18. 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
  19. 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
  20. 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
  21. 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
  22. 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
  23. 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
  24. 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
  25. 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  26. 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
  27. 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  28. 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
  29. 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
  30. 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
  31. 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
  32. 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
  33. 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
  34. 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
  35. 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
  36. 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
  37. 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
  38. 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
  39. 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
  40. 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
  41. 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
  42. 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
  43. 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
  44. 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
  45. 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
  46. 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
  47. 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
  48. 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
  49. 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
  50. 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
  51. 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
  52. 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
  53. 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
  54. 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops
All 100 readings tagged Candlestick patterns
Also on Candlestick patterns5 readings