Skip to main content
Track Candlestick patterns
23 / 54
Library

2004issue C111-4

Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter

This construction scales volume by one-bar true range, labels which side is meeting that effort with a two-session power average, and lets candlestick structure confirm or veto the short-horizon hypothesis.

  • Volume expansion does not identify which side gained control, because a more active struggle can raise buying and selling together.
  • Range-scaled volume measures activity per unit of travel, and only a relative intensity-jump is treated as an event.
  • A two-session moving average of bull-bear-power labels that event as bullish or bearish resistance.
  • The next session's break of the event day's high or low states the hypothesis, while candlestick-patterns only confirm or veto a suspected shift in control.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Volume is effort, not a vote

Volume-price-analysis is a joint reading of activity and the size or path of the price shift. It is used to judge how much effort was required to move the market rather than to treat activity as a standalone directional vote.

Volume expansion does not identify which side gained control, because a more active struggle can raise activity on both the buying and selling sides.

Scale activity by true range

Resistance is constructed from the joint change in volume and price. A large price shift on little volume is treated as weak resistance. Large volume on a small price shift is treated as strong resistance.

That pairing is resistance-intensity: heavy activity against a small range is strong opposition, while easy travel on light activity is weak opposition.

The working series is range-scaled-volume, which is volume divided by true range, or equivalently volume divided by a one-period average true range. Activity is then expressed per unit of price travel, and only relative changes are kept.

An intensity-jump is a relative spike in that series, such as a reading more than 1.5 times the prior bar. The multiple is chosen subjectively by instrument. That jump is treated as the only notable event in the series.

TRsV resistance spikes on Newmont Mining

Daily true-range-specified volume on Newmont Mining from September 2003 into early January 2004. The twelve peaks are the resistance jumps Gimelfarb circled — each more than 1.5 times the prior reading, and most arriving just before a short-term stall or turn. Heights were read from the published MetaStock overlay on the volume pane, not from a table.
Daily true-range-specified volume on Newmont Mining from September 2003 into early January 2004. The twelve peaks are the resistance jumps Gimelfarb circled — each more than 1.5 times the prior reading, and most arriving just before a short-term stall or turn. Heights were read from the published MetaStock overlay on the volume pane, not from a table.Newmont Mining Corp · Daily · 2003-09-02T00:00:00.000Z to 2004-01-05T00:00:00.000Z

The source says only relative TRsV changes matter and treats the 1.5× jump as a subjective, asset-specific cutoff. Peak dates and heights are approximate readings from the magazine raster (volume-pane scale 0–20,000 with a ×1,000 factor).

Label the side with two-session power

A moving-average step labels the side of the struggle. A two-session simple average is applied separately to bull-power and bear-power series so the dominant short-horizon side can be labeled when an intensity event occurs.

Bull-bear-power is that pair of side-specific series. The two-day simple moving average of bull power is compared with the two-day simple moving average of bear power, using observations from the last two periods.

If the two-day bull-power average is above the two-day bear-power average when the intensity event occurs, the resistance is labeled bearish. The reverse ranking is labeled bullish.

Wait for the next session

A discrete follow-through rule waits until the next session. After a bullish-resistance label, a move above the event day's high is treated as a long hypothesis. After a bearish-resistance label, a move below the event day's low is treated as a short hypothesis.

Candlestick-patterns are repeatable open-high-low-close shapes used only as a confirmation or veto layer after a volume-range intensity event, not as a substitute for that construction. Candlestick reversal structures that appear with the event are used only as an extra confirmation layer for a suspected shift in control.

Editorial reading of the three gates

Editorial interpretation: TradersWeek treats the archive workflow as a three-gate drill. First scale volume by one-bar true range so effort is measured against travel. Next classify which side is meeting that effort with the two-session power average. Last, let candlestick structure confirm or veto the resulting short-horizon hypothesis.

That three-gate framing is editorial. It is not attributed to the archive.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
23 of 54 in the Candlestick patterns track
20051-3 pp.Next on Candlestick patternsWeighing reversal clusters against moving-average supportPut a negative stochastic divergence, a one-two-three reversal, a failed-new-high test, and a late-rally shooting star on the reversal side of the ledger.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
  1. 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
  2. 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
  3. 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
  4. 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
  5. 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
  6. 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
  7. 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
  8. 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
  9. 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
  10. 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
  11. 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
  12. 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
  13. 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
  14. 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
  15. 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
  16. 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
  17. 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
  18. 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
  19. 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
  20. 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
  21. 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
  22. 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
  23. 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
  24. 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
  25. 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  26. 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
  27. 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  28. 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
  29. 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
  30. 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
  31. 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
  32. 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
  33. 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
  34. 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
  35. 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
  36. 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
  37. 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
  38. 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
  39. 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
  40. 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
  41. 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
  42. 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
  43. 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
  44. 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
  45. 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
  46. 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
  47. 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
  48. 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
  49. 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
  50. 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
  51. 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
  52. 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
  53. 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
  54. 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops
All 100 readings tagged Candlestick patterns
Also on Candlestick patterns5 readings