Skip to main content
Track Candlestick patterns
15 / 54
Library

2001issue C121-4

Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit

Treat a key reversal up as a countable next-bar event first. Measure how often the following high is reachable, then lock that event into one short-horizon mechanical procedure with a close entry, a prior-high exit, and a pre-set stop.

  • Study raw OHLC structure first and write the key reversal up as a pattern function so the next-bar high test can be counted.
  • Repeat a multi-market census on at least 10 to 15 noncorrelated markets and treat the setup as a system candidate only if it stays valid in more than six or seven of them.
  • The mechanical procedure buys the close of the qualifying bar and places a next-bar exit at that bar's high.
  • A $250 fixed stop-loss is attached at entry as a cash risk bound, and it lowers the win rate relative to the raw next-high census.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Study raw OHLC first

The construction sequence studies raw OHLC bar structure before any moving-average or oscillator transform is used as a forecast input. Editorial note: that order keeps the candle as a condition to count, not as a forecast already in hand.

A key reversal up is specified as a lower low than the prior bar, a higher close than the prior close, and a close that is not the same bar's high. The bar undercuts the prior low, closes above the prior close, and does not close on its own high.

Write a pattern function, then count

The pattern is first written as a reusable condition so occurrences can be counted and so the share of cases where the next high is at or above the prior high can be measured. That reusable condition is the pattern function.

The next-bar high test is the count of how often the bar after the reversal prints a high at or above the reversal bar high.

Repeat a multi-market census

The multi-market census is to be repeated on at least 10 to 15 noncorrelated markets. A setup is treated as a system candidate only if it remains valid in more than six or seven of them.

Across the tabulated markets the reversal appeared on 8.51% of bars on average, and the next-high condition held on 70.71% of those occurrences.

Next-bar high after a key reversal up, ten markets

After a key reversal up, the following bar’s high reached or beat the reversal bar’s high in every listed market, from 60.25% in yen futures to 81.37% in municipal bonds, averaging 70.71%. The pattern itself is uncommon, averaging 8.51% of bars, so the tradable fact is the next-high hit rate, not how often the setup appears. Percentages are the exact figures from the author’s ten-market census table.
After a key reversal up, the following bar’s high reached or beat the reversal bar’s high in every listed market, from 60.25% in yen futures to 81.37% in municipal bonds, averaging 70.71%. The pattern itself is uncommon, averaging 8.51% of bars, so the tradable fact is the next-high hit rate, not how often the setup appears. Percentages are the exact figures from the author’s ten-market census table.Daily

A key reversal up is a lower low, a higher close, and a close that is not that bar’s high. Next-bar success is counted when the following high is greater than or equal to the prior high.

Lock one short-horizon mechanical procedure

The mechanical long rule buys the close of the qualifying bar and places a next-bar exit at that bar's high. That mechanical procedure states when to enter, when to take the prior-high exit, when to stop out, and when to stand aside.

Editorial note: when the pattern function is not present, the procedure stands aside rather than forcing a trade.

Attach a fixed stop-loss at entry

The coded test attaches a $250 fixed stop-loss at entry and omits slippage and commissions from the procedure. A fixed stop-loss is a cash loss bound attached at entry rather than a volatility-scaled exit.

The cash stop is described as lowering the win rate relative to the raw next-high census. A volatility-based stop is offered as a later refinement of the risk bound rather than of the candle rule.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
15 of 54 in the Candlestick patterns track
20011-3 pp.Next on Candlestick patternsRising and falling three continuation candle constructionA candlestick is assembled from the session open, high, low, and close: a light-body closes above the open, a dark-body closes below the open, and the shadows mark the high and low.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
  1. 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
  2. 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
  3. 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
  4. 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
  5. 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
  6. 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
  7. 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
  8. 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
  9. 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
  10. 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
  11. 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
  12. 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
  13. 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
  14. 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
  15. 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
  16. 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
  17. 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
  18. 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
  19. 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
  20. 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
  21. 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
  22. 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
  23. 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
  24. 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
  25. 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  26. 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
  27. 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  28. 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
  29. 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
  30. 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
  31. 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
  32. 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
  33. 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
  34. 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
  35. 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
  36. 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
  37. 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
  38. 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
  39. 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
  40. 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
  41. 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
  42. 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
  43. 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
  44. 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
  45. 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
  46. 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
  47. 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
  48. 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
  49. 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
  50. 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
  51. 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
  52. 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
  53. 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
  54. 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops
All 100 readings tagged Candlestick patterns
Also on Candlestick patterns5 readings