Skip to main content
Track Candlestick patterns
49 / 54
Library

2017issue C1044-47

Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups

A pin bar or inside bar is unfinished until it sits on support or resistance, receives a close or break trigger, and is bounded by a stop-loss beyond the invalidating extreme. On a naked chart that sequence is what turns a wick or a contained range into a complete construction.

  • A pin bar or inside bar is treated as complete only when it forms at support, resistance, or other overlapping levels and is paired with a close or break trigger and a stop-loss beyond the invalidating extreme.
  • Wick-rejection reads a long lower wick at support as rejection of lower prices and a long upper wick at resistance as rejection of higher prices, with a longer wick treated as a stronger rejection.
  • An inside bar is defined by high-to-low containment of at least two candles, ignoring the real body, and is entered on a break of the contained bar with the stop-loss beyond the opposite extreme.
  • Pin-bar constructions are described as usable on all timeframes, with the daily chart preferred among the one-hour, four-hour, and daily charts named.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Unfinished construction on a naked chart

Candlestick charts can be read using only open-high-low-close bars, without overlay indicators. That is a naked-chart reading: the bar itself, not an added study, is the object under construction.

Pin-bar and inside-bar constructions are treated as complete when they form at support, resistance, or other overlapping levels. That overlap is confluence, the meeting of the candlestick pattern with support-resistance or other matching levels on the same chart.

Pin-bar location, trigger, and stop

A pin bar belongs to the same structural family as a hammer, dragonfly doji, shooting star, gravestone doji, or inverted hammer. It is recognized when its wick stands well beyond neighboring bars. In that reading a pin bar is a candlestick with a small body and a wick that stands well beyond neighboring bars, taken as rejection of the extreme that wick reached.

A long lower wick is treated as rejection of lower prices at support. A long upper wick is treated as rejection of higher prices at resistance. A longer wick is treated as a stronger rejection. That reading is wick-rejection: a long upper or lower shadow shows failed acceptance of that price extreme.

The described bullish pin-bar entry is a later close above the short wick. The stop-loss is placed below the long wick, with extra room beyond the exact extreme. The bearish case is reversed: a later close below the short wick, and the stop-loss above the long wick with the same extra room.

Three pin-bar exits are specified. One is a target three times the pin-bar height. Another is an exit on a later reversal candle during a trend. The third is an exit at the next support or resistance.

Pin-bar constructions are described as usable on all timeframes. The one-hour, four-hour, and daily charts are named, and the daily chart is preferred.

Inside-bar containment and break

An inside bar is a structure of at least two candles in which a later bar's entire high-to-low range sits inside the prior bar's range. Highs and lows are used. The real body is ignored, unlike harami or engulfing definitions.

An inside bar is described both as a continuation reading after expansion bars and as a possible turning-point reading at support or resistance. The later bar is required to be the opposite color of the preceding bar.

An inside-bar entry is a break of the contained bar's high or low. The stop-loss is beyond the opposite extreme of that inside bar. The stated target is twice the initial risk distance.

What the stop-loss is doing

In both constructions the stop-loss is an order placed beyond the pattern's invalidating extreme so a failed bar reading has a predefined exit. Editorial: without that bound, and without confluence at support-resistance, the wick or contained range remains a description of the chart rather than a complete setup.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
49 of 54 in the Candlestick patterns track
201750-56 pp.Next on Candlestick patternsTwo-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exitsThe featured technique shortens three-white-soldiers and three-black-crows into two-bar one-white-soldier and one-black-crow definitions so the reversal highlight can fire more often.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
  1. 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
  2. 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
  3. 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
  4. 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
  5. 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
  6. 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
  7. 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
  8. 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
  9. 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
  10. 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
  11. 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
  12. 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
  13. 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
  14. 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
  15. 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
  16. 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
  17. 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
  18. 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
  19. 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
  20. 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
  21. 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
  22. 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
  23. 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
  24. 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
  25. 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  26. 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
  27. 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  28. 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
  29. 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
  30. 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
  31. 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
  32. 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
  33. 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
  34. 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
  35. 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
  36. 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
  37. 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
  38. 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
  39. 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
  40. 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
  41. 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
  42. 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
  43. 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
  44. 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
  45. 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
  46. 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
  47. 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
  48. 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
  49. 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
  50. 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
  51. 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
  52. 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
  53. 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
  54. 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops
All 100 readings tagged Candlestick patterns
Also on Candlestick patterns5 readings