Skip to main content
Track Candlestick patterns
53 / 54
Library

2019issue C0122-25

Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom

A programmed double-bottom scan of S&P 500 and Russell 3000 constituents, from 2001 through the start of 2018, was then stacked with volume-price, acceleration, and breakout-candle filters. Editorial view: keep the finished pattern only when those rules change the tape and shrink the sample.

  • A double bottom is complete only on the breakout that first clears the mid-pattern peak. Volume-price, acceleration, and breakout-candle rules were then stacked on that finished structure as independent combination tests.
  • A volume-price filter requires an extreme-volume session, at least twice the prior 14-session average and the highest volume of the prior 60 sessions, either anywhere inside the pattern or only between the right trough and the breakout.
  • Acceleration keeps the setup when the final ascent lasts fewer sessions than the drop from the mid-pattern peak into the right trough. Candle overlays add three higher closes, a long-body candle, a near-full-range bullish breakout candle, or a short upper shadow.
  • Added filters cut the large-cap sample from 943 events to 75 under the tightest bullish-candle breakout rule. The smaller samples were treated as statistically less reliable.
Entries in this reading3 entries

The finished double bottom is the starting sample

A programmed double-bottom scan was applied to S&P 500 and Russell 3000 constituents from 2001 through the start of 2018. A double bottom is a two-trough reversal whose completion is marked by a break above the intervening peak. The breakout is the session that first clears that mid-pattern peak and thereby completes the structure.

High volume, a shorter final ascent, and bullish breakout-day candle structure were examined as independent combination tests stacked onto the same completed double bottom. The two-trough picture was the shared starting sample, not the last word on the tape.

Volume-price filters locate participation

A volume-price filter is a participation test that requires unusually heavy volume either somewhere inside the whole pattern or only on the late advance into the breakout. One version requires some session inside the entire pattern to print at least twice the prior 14-session average volume and also the highest volume of the prior 60 sessions.

A narrower volume-price filter confines that extreme-volume session to the interval between the right trough and the breakout. That version ties volume to the late advance rather than to either trough.

Acceleration requires a shorter final ascent

The final ascent is the rally from the right trough to the breakout. An acceleration filter requires that rise to last fewer sessions than the preceding drop from the mid-pattern peak to that right trough. The comparison is a session count, not a redrawing of the same two-trough outline.

Breakout-candle filters test acceptance

A three-higher-closes overlay requires three consecutive higher closes ending on the breakout session. A long-body candle filter flags a session whose real body exceeds the bodies of the three prior sessions, applied either between the right trough and the breakout or on the breakout session itself.

A bullish breakout candle was defined as a session whose close is nearly equal to the high, whose open is nearly equal to the low, and whose upper and lower shadows are each no longer than $0.05, with no constraint on total candle length. A second breakout-candle filter requires the upper shadow to be shorter than the real body so the session does not resemble a shooting-star rejection.

Tighter stacks leave fewer events

Added filters reduced event counts relative to the unfiltered pattern. The large-cap sample fell from 943 events to 75 under the tightest bullish-candle breakout rule, and the smaller samples were treated as statistically less reliable.

Profit factor of double-bottom filters

Each added rule changes expectancy, not just the picture of the same setup. On S&P 500 names the raw completed double bottom prints a 1.62 profit factor; requiring a high-volume day, a shorter right-hand rise, or a bullish breakout candle lifts that to 1.84, 2.35, and 3.22. Russell 3000 names move the same way but stay closer to 1.2–1.6. The strongest S&P 500 print sits on only 75 trades versus 943 in the unfiltered sample, so the filter that most improves the tape also thins the count. Figures are the author’s backtest tables for S&P 500 and Russell 3000 constituents from 2001 through the start of 2018.
Each added rule changes expectancy, not just the picture of the same setup. On S&P 500 names the raw completed double bottom prints a 1.62 profit factor; requiring a high-volume day, a shorter right-hand rise, or a bullish breakout candle lifts that to 1.84, 2.35, and 3.22. Russell 3000 names move the same way but stay closer to 1.2–1.6. The strongest S&P 500 print sits on only 75 trades versus 943 in the unfiltered sample, so the filter that most improves the tape also thins the count. Figures are the author’s backtest tables for S&P 500 and Russell 3000 constituents from 2001 through the start of 2018.S&P 500 and Russell 3000 stocks · 2001 through the start of 2018 · 2001-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2018-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

High volume meant at least twice the prior 14-day average and the highest print of the past 60 sessions. Acceleration required the rise from the right bottom to breakout to be shorter than the drop from the midpoint high to the right bottom. Bullish breakout candles allowed upper and lower shadows of at most $0.05. The author flags the 75-trade S&P 500 bullish-candle result as statistically less reliable.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
53 of 54 in the Candlestick patterns track
201944-45 pp.Next on Candlestick patternsSector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stopsA three-stage screen classifies index trends, then trends in selected ETFs, industry groups, and stocks as leadership rotates, then isolates names that move with those sector shifts.
All readings on this track · 54 readings
  1. 1990Constructing three-session rally and reaction volume signals
  2. 1991Constructing candlestick real bodies and multi-session patterns
  3. 1991Treat a candlestick reversal as incomplete until %D confirms it
  4. 1991Filtering candlestick signals with stochastic percent-D
  5. 1991Constructing compressed candlestick summaries
  6. 1993Intraday candlestick confirmation with oscillators
  7. 1993Candlestick hypotheses from a 1993 reading list
  8. 1994License candlestick signals with oscillators and weekly vetoes
  9. 1995Real-body support, resistance, and close-through breakouts
  10. 1997Weekly reversal as a three-part hypothesis
  11. 1998Turning fear levels into testable rules with a psychological matrix
  12. 2000Evaluating three-bar reversal reliability
  13. 2000Prior-day candles, open confirmation, and same-session stops
  14. 2000Intraday candlestick volume confirmation for daytrading
  15. 2001Count the key reversal up before coding a mechanical exit
  16. 2001Rising and falling three continuation candle construction
  17. 2002Treat a moving average as a contested fence
  18. 2003Candlestick signals need support and a risk-reward screen
  19. 2003Constructing one-day reversal tops and bottoms
  20. 2003Chart sentiment as a regime filter for hourly stochastic entries
  21. 2004Confirming index reversals with candlesticks, stochastics and averages
  22. 2004The harami inner close as a reversal barometer
  23. 2004Constructing a true-range volume power-shift filter
  24. 2005Weighing reversal clusters against moving-average support
  25. 2005Candlestick exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  26. 2005Confirming piercing patterns with stochastics and moving averages
  27. 2006Candlestick cluster exits confirmed by overbought stochastics
  28. 2007Three black crows become a trade hypothesis only after regime, trend and nearby levels
  29. 2008Asymmetrical RSI lookbacks for divergence and candle confirmation
  30. 2008A permission checklist for the end of a trend
  31. 2010Mechanical entries still need confirmation gates
  32. 2010Crude oil as a case study in candlestick session reading
  33. 2010Gold weekly candles and the thousand resistance breakout
  34. 2010A three-layer gold chart drill from waves to candle confirmation
  35. 2011Why entry scans fail without trend filters
  36. 2011Price-zone oscillator trend-regime rules
  37. 2011A candlestick checklist before commodity entries
  38. 2013Step candle construction at price turning points
  39. 2013Two-bar step-candle construction
  40. 2014Small-range bars as a timed volume-climax hypothesis
  41. 2014Constructing volume-scaled candlestick charts
  42. 2015Weekly range midpoints as support and resistance
  43. 2015Constructing weekly body-midpoint pattern codes
  44. 2015Evaluating encoded candlestick sequence hypotheses
  45. 2015Constructing a breakout relative-strength index from two-day range candles
  46. 2016A three-gate classroom on hourly sterling
  47. 2016Fibonacci retracement as a pre-commitment stop map
  48. 2017Nine-zone filter for decade-level breakouts
  49. 2017Constructing pin-bar and inside-bar setups
  50. 2017Two-bar soldier and crow rules become a system only after filters and exits
  51. 2017Confirm a one-white-soldier or one-black-crow before entry
  52. 2018Session control from marubozu and engulfing geometry
  53. 2019Volume, acceleration, and candle filters on a completed double bottom
  54. 2019Sector-filtered candlestick scans and predrawn stops
All 100 readings tagged Candlestick patterns
Also on Candlestick patterns5 readings