Skip to main content
Track Volume confirmation
2 / 40
Library

1989issue C051-5

Commodity advance-decline from delivery months

A commodity futures index can be rebuilt as a daily vote of listed delivery-month closes. The archive accumulates that basket-sum into a cumulative breadth line and charts it against the index for confirmation or divergence.

  • A session advance-decline net is the count of higher closes minus lower closes, whether those closes are listed stocks or futures delivery months.
  • The cumulative breadth line may begin at any seed, is plotted beside the daily index close, and treats shared higher or lower trends as confirmation.
  • Inside one commodity, each delivery month is one vote. The daily commodity-market reading is the basket-sum of those nets across the 21-member futures index.
  • Because a small uptick and a large advance both register as one equal-weight close, participation can lead or lag a concentrated index.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Session net and the running line

A session advance-decline net is the number of advancing closes minus the number of declining closes. In the archive workflow, 235 advances and 356 declines equal a net of -121.

The cumulative breadth line is a running total of those session nets and may start at any seed. A seed of 1,000 plus a session net of -121 equals 879, and adding a following net of +205 equals 1,084.

The running total is charted against a daily price-index close. Joint higher or lower trends count as confirmation. Opposite trends count as non-confirmation of market breadth.

Equal-weight closes and divergence

Because a close up a small increment and a close up several points each count as one advance, the tally is an equal-weight close. A rising breadth line with a lagging index can mark weak upside. A falling breadth line with a slower-falling index can mark residual strength.

Divergence is the case where the index and the breadth line disagree on a new high or a new low. The archive uses that disagreement as a warning that the price move may not be widely shared.

The equity illustration

In the illustrated equity episode, a July recovery high in the industrial average that the breadth line did not confirm was followed by a 180-point decline.

A later June-to-August drop in which the average held its May low while the line broke its May low was treated as a strength non-confirmation before a rally to new recovery highs.

Delivery-month votes and the basket-sum

A commodity analogue is formed by summing, each day, up-closing minus down-closing delivery months across all 21 members of the commodity futures price-index basket, then accumulating that daily net and charting it against the index. That daily market reading is the basket-sum of the per-commodity nets.

Per-commodity nets treat every delivery month as one vote. Seven corn months all closing higher contribute +7. Oats with two months higher and three lower contribute -1.

The 1988 commodity illustration

In the 1988 commodity illustration, May joint new yearly highs confirmed a broad rally. A late-June stall in the breadth line while the index edged higher was a minor divergence. July produced a string of non-confirmations, then a late-July confirmed downtrend of lower highs and lower lows.

Later autumn divergences included a breadth return to yearly highs the index could not match, an unconfirmed November index uptick, and unconfirmed new index lows in mid-November.

After that mid-November non-confirmation, the breadth line made new yearly highs while the index only surpassed August-September resistance. The archive frames the long-horizon split as negative, and the near-term joint advance as the reading to respect.

CRB futures index, 1988

Daily CRB futures price index through 1988, read off the plotted curve. The May high at D and the late-June extension at E are the breadth-check points; the September break and the mid-November low at I are the later non-confirmations against the delivery-month vote line.
Daily CRB futures price index through 1988, read off the plotted curve. The May high at D and the late-June extension at E are the breadth-check points; the September break and the mid-November low at I are the later non-confirmations against the delivery-month vote line.CRB futures price index · daily · 1988-01-04T00:00:00.000Z to 1988-12-20T00:00:00.000Z

Values are approximate readings from the magazine raster, not a printed table. Tick marks on the source run 04-Jan through 20-Dec 1988. Point labels D, E, F, H and I follow the article. No more precision than the scan will bear.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
2 of 40 in the Volume confirmation track
19891-4 pp.Next on Volume confirmationThe most-active list as a three-layer breadth labA daily roster of the 15 most-traded exchange issues can be reduced to an average-price statistic for speculative tone, with low-priced leadership treated as more speculative and typically associated with swing peaks.
All readings on this track · 40 readings
  1. 1988Constructing volume-confirmation overlays on OHLC spreadsheet charts
  2. 1989Commodity advance-decline from delivery months
  3. 1989The most-active list as a three-layer breadth lab
  4. 1989Constructing a yield-curve volume-breadth composite
  5. 1989A bond-futures case study in support, volume, and confirmation
  6. 1989Volume-scaled price boxes and volume cycles
  7. 1990Futures-signed on-balance volume construction
  8. 1990Self-relative volume boxes for news-free breakouts
  9. 1990Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters
  10. 1991A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share
  11. 1991Tick extremes that confirm double tops and bottoms
  12. 1991Constructing auction fuel from volume and open interest
  13. 1994Constructing On-balance volume with smoothing and timeframe confirmation
  14. 1996A volume-gated moving-average trend combination
  15. 1996Constructing four-state range-volume bars
  16. 1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdown
  17. 1997Construct a head-and-shoulders before the neckline break
  18. 2004Volume confirmation is not optional for a head-and-shoulders reversal
  19. 2007Constructing a three-factor volume-price confirmation filter
  20. 2007Constructing a three-condition moving-average entry with a volume filter
  21. 2008Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
  22. 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and volume
  23. 2011Filter executable futures with liquidity and open interest
  24. 2012Rank listed futures by liquidity before a forecast chooses the name
  25. 2012Filter futures liquidity using open interest and volume
  26. 2013Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter
  27. 2014A futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volume
  28. 2014Evaluating futures contract liquidity before execution
  29. 2014Constructing defended price lines from volume clusters
  30. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume
  31. 2015Filter futures ideas by ranked contract liquidity
  32. 2017Screen listed futures for execution liquidity first
  33. 2017Filter futures orders by liquidity, open interest, and volume
  34. 2018Using open interest and volume to rank futures liquidity
  35. 2018Score listed futures as an execution menu before the setup
  36. 2019Filtering futures orders with liquidity, open interest and volume
  37. 2019Futures liquidity as an execution filter
  38. 2020A futures liquidity board as a pre-trade execution filter
  39. 2020Sequenced volume and golden-cross breakout rules
  40. 2020Use a listed-futures liquidity filter before execution
All 54 readings tagged Volume confirmation
Also on Volume confirmation5 readings