2008issue C111-4
Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
This case study restates a historical after-hours scan that treated a breakout as one procedure: a moving-average regime gate, a volume confirmation, and a liquidity filter, with cash as the prescribed action when indexes were trendless.
- The long-side scan required price above the 50-day average and that average above the 200-day average. Shorts reversed both conditions, and new long scans waited for the same stack plus a follow-through day on the indexes.
- Breakouts from double bottoms, cups, and cup-with-handle patterns after an uptrend needed breakout-day volume above the 50-day average, or a strong green-to-max-green Balance of Power reading as a substitute accumulation signal.
- Names averaging under 50,000 shares were rejected as too illiquid, because a single earnings miss could produce a large gap loss.
- When indexes were trendless the procedure held cash. Stops were not left on the book, and after a 100% gain the final sell was a break of the 200-day average.
A nightly scan, not a day-trading book
The archive records a scan-and-filter procedure that had been in use since 1998 and was run after hours rather than as a day-trading book. The breakout system entered only after price left a defined base or trend condition, held only while a moving-average stack remained intact, and treated abstention as an explicit third outcome when the market was not in that regime.
The regime gate
The long-side scan required price above the 50-day average and that 50-day average above the 200-day average. The short-side scan reversed both conditions.
New long scans were acted on only after a regime gate on the indexes: the same 50-day-above-200-day stack, plus a follow-through day. Failed rally attempts with empty scans and low-volume, low-priced names were treated as no-bottom signals.
When indexes were trendless, the prescribed action was to hold cash rather than force entries. That cash stance is the procedure's abstention rule.
Volume confirmation on the breakout
Breakout entries were taken from double bottoms, cups, and cup-with-handle patterns after a prior uptrend. They were preferred only when the breakout day showed heavy volume.
Volume confirmation required breakout-day volume to exceed the 50-day volume average. Far-above-average volume was treated as evidence of major accumulation. If breakout volume was not heavy, the procedure still required a strong green-to-max-green Balance of Power reading as a substitute accumulation signal.
The liquidity filter
The liquidity filter rejected names with average volume under 50,000 shares as too illiquid. A single earnings miss in those names could produce a large gap loss, and typical daily volume was treated as too thin to absorb that event without a large gap.
Exits after the close
Stops were not left resting on the book. Exits were reviewed after the close when holdings showed heavy-volume selling or a breakdown, because intraday dips in bull markets often reversed by the close.
After a 100% gain, the final sell rule was a break of the 200-day moving average. Otherwise the intended hold could extend toward a 12-month horizon while price stayed above the 50-day average.
All readings on this track · 40 readings
- 1988Constructing volume-confirmation overlays on OHLC spreadsheet charts
- 1989Commodity advance-decline from delivery months
- 1989The most-active list as a three-layer breadth lab
- 1989Constructing a yield-curve volume-breadth composite
- 1989A bond-futures case study in support, volume, and confirmation
- 1989Volume-scaled price boxes and volume cycles
- 1990Futures-signed on-balance volume construction
- 1990Self-relative volume boxes for news-free breakouts
- 1990Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters
- 1991A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share
- 1991Tick extremes that confirm double tops and bottoms
- 1991Constructing auction fuel from volume and open interest
- 1994Constructing On-balance volume with smoothing and timeframe confirmation
- 1996A volume-gated moving-average trend combination
- 1996Constructing four-state range-volume bars
- 1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdown
- 1997Construct a head-and-shoulders before the neckline break
- 2004Volume confirmation is not optional for a head-and-shoulders reversal
- 2007Constructing a three-factor volume-price confirmation filter
- 2007Constructing a three-condition moving-average entry with a volume filter
- 2008Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
- 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and volume
- 2011Filter executable futures with liquidity and open interest
- 2012Rank listed futures by liquidity before a forecast chooses the name
- 2012Filter futures liquidity using open interest and volume
- 2013Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter
- 2014A futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volume
- 2014Evaluating futures contract liquidity before execution
- 2014Constructing defended price lines from volume clusters
- 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume
- 2015Filter futures ideas by ranked contract liquidity
- 2017Screen listed futures for execution liquidity first
- 2017Filter futures orders by liquidity, open interest, and volume
- 2018Using open interest and volume to rank futures liquidity
- 2018Score listed futures as an execution menu before the setup
- 2019Filtering futures orders with liquidity, open interest and volume
- 2019Futures liquidity as an execution filter
- 2020A futures liquidity board as a pre-trade execution filter
- 2020Sequenced volume and golden-cross breakout rules
- 2020Use a listed-futures liquidity filter before execution