Skip to main content
Track Volume confirmation
9 / 40
Library

1990issue C101-8

Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters

This editorial lesson reads expanding highs and lows as a stop-run classroom. The fourth swing is not treated as a trade until a compact demand or supply test completes, and later volume on a break of a prior peak decides whether the same geometry is still a with-trend pause or already the first half of a larger top.

  • A broadening triangle is drawn as rising swing highs with falling swing lows, and the same geometry may later be labeled a pause or a reversal.
  • The third-to-fourth swing is treated as more bearish when it lasts longer, covers more ground than the first pullback, and undercuts that earlier low, because resting sell-stops can be triggered.
  • A with-trend case after the fourth swing waits on a completed one-to-four-day demand pattern and a move back through earlier broken support.
  • Volume on a later break of a prior peak can be labeled climactic supply or insufficient demand, and joining adjacent expanding sequences can count the later peak as half of a larger top.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Expanding highs and lows

A broadening triangle is drawn as rising swing highs together with falling swing lows. The same geometry may later be labeled either a pause or a reversal.

The fourth swing as a stop-run

In the bullish classroom sketch, the third-to-fourth swing is treated as more bearish when it lasts longer and covers more ground than the first pullback and also undercuts that first pullback low, because resting sell-stops below the earlier low can be triggered and nearby sentiment can flip.

Editorial reading: that undercut is the stop-run. Price travel through a prior swing is expected to trigger resting protective orders and force nearby positions to flip.

The with-trend setup after the fourth swing is specified as a completed demand pattern lasting one to four days, and only if price then advances back through the earlier broken support.

Compact demand tests

Inside that demand window, a double bottom is defined as buyers appearing at the same support on two sessions, with a long trigger above the second session high and a risk line under that same high.

A spring-style demand test is specified as a down-day that reverses and closes on its high, followed by one to three narrow sessions on light volume, with a long trigger above the reversal-day high after that pause.

If price then prints a fifth swing to a new high, the interval spanning the first four labeled points can be reread as a corrective phase rather than a finished top.

When continuation is rejected

In the March 1990 Treasury bond futures example from the second half of 1989, a mid-September failure to remain above the August 17 high was the stated reason to reject treating the later expanding swing as another fourth-point continuation from the prior sequence.

In that same bearish expanding sequence, the fourth swing's distribution was described as complicated by the time spent building a double top.

When the two adjacent expanding sequences were joined and the later peak was counted as a seventh point, the resulting seven-point broadening top was described as half of the larger reversal that ended the preceding bond uptrend.

Volume on a later peak

A later high that coincided with a volume spike through a prior peak was labeled a climactic supply event, while a subsequent advance accompanied by weak volume was labeled insufficient demand.

Editorial reading: volume on that later break of a prior peak is the participation filter that decides whether the same expanding geometry is still a with-trend pause or already the first half of a larger top.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
9 of 40 in the Volume confirmation track
19911-6 pp.Next on Volume confirmationA same-session pressure test of breadth and volume shareThe breadth-volume reading divides the advancing-to-declining issue ratio by the advancing-to-declining volume ratio so the count of names can be checked against volume share.
All readings on this track · 40 readings
  1. 1988Constructing volume-confirmation overlays on OHLC spreadsheet charts
  2. 1989Commodity advance-decline from delivery months
  3. 1989The most-active list as a three-layer breadth lab
  4. 1989Constructing a yield-curve volume-breadth composite
  5. 1989A bond-futures case study in support, volume, and confirmation
  6. 1989Volume-scaled price boxes and volume cycles
  7. 1990Futures-signed on-balance volume construction
  8. 1990Self-relative volume boxes for news-free breakouts
  9. 1990Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters
  10. 1991A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share
  11. 1991Tick extremes that confirm double tops and bottoms
  12. 1991Constructing auction fuel from volume and open interest
  13. 1994Constructing On-balance volume with smoothing and timeframe confirmation
  14. 1996A volume-gated moving-average trend combination
  15. 1996Constructing four-state range-volume bars
  16. 1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdown
  17. 1997Construct a head-and-shoulders before the neckline break
  18. 2004Volume confirmation is not optional for a head-and-shoulders reversal
  19. 2007Constructing a three-factor volume-price confirmation filter
  20. 2007Constructing a three-condition moving-average entry with a volume filter
  21. 2008Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
  22. 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and volume
  23. 2011Filter executable futures with liquidity and open interest
  24. 2012Rank listed futures by liquidity before a forecast chooses the name
  25. 2012Filter futures liquidity using open interest and volume
  26. 2013Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter
  27. 2014A futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volume
  28. 2014Evaluating futures contract liquidity before execution
  29. 2014Constructing defended price lines from volume clusters
  30. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume
  31. 2015Filter futures ideas by ranked contract liquidity
  32. 2017Screen listed futures for execution liquidity first
  33. 2017Filter futures orders by liquidity, open interest, and volume
  34. 2018Using open interest and volume to rank futures liquidity
  35. 2018Score listed futures as an execution menu before the setup
  36. 2019Filtering futures orders with liquidity, open interest and volume
  37. 2019Futures liquidity as an execution filter
  38. 2020A futures liquidity board as a pre-trade execution filter
  39. 2020Sequenced volume and golden-cross breakout rules
  40. 2020Use a listed-futures liquidity filter before execution
All 54 readings tagged Volume confirmation
Also on Volume confirmation5 readings