Skip to main content
Track Volume confirmation
26 / 40
Library

2013issue C0276

Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter

A futures liquidity rank turns equal-dollar contract count, open interest, and a volume factor into a descending comparison so a book can be accepted or rejected for implementability before a directional setup is sized.

  • A futures liquidity rank can be formed by multiplying contract point value, a three-year maximum price motion, open interest, and a volume adjustment that typically sits between 1 and 4.
  • The same relative-liquidity score can be restated as equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor.
  • Denser activity marks on a descending comparison indicate an easier book to buy and sell, and one or no marks indicate little activity.
  • Each column in the screen is a proportional measure and is meaningful only when compared with other entries in that same column.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A rank of how readily a book can trade

The historical workflow forms a futures liquidity rank by multiplying contract point value, a three-year maximum price motion, open interest, and a volume adjustment that typically sits between 1 and 4. Relative contract liquidity is a descending rank of how readily an entire futures book can be transacted after scaling for equal-dollar size, outstanding contracts, and a volume adjustment.

Relative liquidity can be shown as a descending comparison in which denser activity marks indicate an easier book to buy and sell, and one or no marks indicate little activity.

Equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume

An equal-dollar contract count can be computed as tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion so different futures share a common profit-scale unit. It states how many contracts of one market must be used so its multi-year price excursion matches another market on a common dollar scale.

Open interest is the stock of outstanding contracts used as a size input when judging how easily a futures book can be traded. The same relative-liquidity score can be restated as equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor.

The volume factor is the greater of 1 and an exponential transform of volume against a 5,000-unit baseline. It is a multiplier floored at one that scales the liquidity rank when reported volume sits far from a fixed baseline.

Companion columns stay comparative

Effective percent margin is posted margin dollars divided by the three-year dollar range of the contract and then scaled to a percent, allowing margin outlay to be compared across markets. It expresses capital locked per unit of historical range.

Each column in the screen is a proportional measure and is meaningful only when compared with other entries in that same column.

In cash equities, period volume as a percentage of shares outstanding can be treated as a turnover-rate proxy for trading liquidity.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
26 of 40 in the Volume confirmation track
201465-65 pp.Next on Volume confirmationA futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volumeAn equal-dollar-range unit converts each futures name into the contract count needed to span the same three-year dollar excursion.
All readings on this track · 40 readings
  1. 1988Constructing volume-confirmation overlays on OHLC spreadsheet charts
  2. 1989Commodity advance-decline from delivery months
  3. 1989The most-active list as a three-layer breadth lab
  4. 1989Constructing a yield-curve volume-breadth composite
  5. 1989A bond-futures case study in support, volume, and confirmation
  6. 1989Volume-scaled price boxes and volume cycles
  7. 1990Futures-signed on-balance volume construction
  8. 1990Self-relative volume boxes for news-free breakouts
  9. 1990Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters
  10. 1991A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share
  11. 1991Tick extremes that confirm double tops and bottoms
  12. 1991Constructing auction fuel from volume and open interest
  13. 1994Constructing On-balance volume with smoothing and timeframe confirmation
  14. 1996A volume-gated moving-average trend combination
  15. 1996Constructing four-state range-volume bars
  16. 1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdown
  17. 1997Construct a head-and-shoulders before the neckline break
  18. 2004Volume confirmation is not optional for a head-and-shoulders reversal
  19. 2007Constructing a three-factor volume-price confirmation filter
  20. 2007Constructing a three-condition moving-average entry with a volume filter
  21. 2008Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
  22. 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and volume
  23. 2011Filter executable futures with liquidity and open interest
  24. 2012Rank listed futures by liquidity before a forecast chooses the name
  25. 2012Filter futures liquidity using open interest and volume
  26. 2013Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter
  27. 2014A futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volume
  28. 2014Evaluating futures contract liquidity before execution
  29. 2014Constructing defended price lines from volume clusters
  30. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume
  31. 2015Filter futures ideas by ranked contract liquidity
  32. 2017Screen listed futures for execution liquidity first
  33. 2017Filter futures orders by liquidity, open interest, and volume
  34. 2018Using open interest and volume to rank futures liquidity
  35. 2018Score listed futures as an execution menu before the setup
  36. 2019Filtering futures orders with liquidity, open interest and volume
  37. 2019Futures liquidity as an execution filter
  38. 2020A futures liquidity board as a pre-trade execution filter
  39. 2020Sequenced volume and golden-cross breakout rules
  40. 2020Use a listed-futures liquidity filter before execution
All 54 readings tagged Volume confirmation
Also on Volume confirmation5 readings