Skip to main content
Track Volume confirmation
10 / 40
Library

1991issue C041-6

A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share

The archive checks an advance-decline count against volume share, then reads the pairing against a dense historical band of index net change. Direction and speed of the reading, including a leading horizontal move and a joint watch with the tick tape, are treated as more informative than the absolute level.

  • The breadth-volume reading divides the advancing-to-declining issue ratio by the advancing-to-declining volume ratio so the count of names can be checked against volume share.
  • A reading of 1.00 is treated as equilibrium; values below it indicate advancing stocks are receiving more than their share of volume, and values above it indicate declining stocks are.
  • Most daily closes stayed near 1.00, and a one-year scatter of S&P 500 net change against the same-day reading formed a dense normal zone from rising prices with a low reading to falling prices with a high reading.
  • Direction and speed of change, including a leading horizontal move and a joint watch with the tick tape, are treated as more informative than the absolute level.
Entries in this reading3 entries

The reading that checks volume share

The archive calculates the breadth-volume reading as the advancing-to-declining issue ratio divided by the advancing-to-declining volume ratio. That single figure is used to ask whether rising names are receiving a proportionate share of traded volume.

Volume share is a different question from the raw advance-decline count. A reading of 1.00 is treated as the equilibrium reading, a standoff in which advancing and declining stocks receive volume in proportion to their counts. Values below 1.00 indicate advancing stocks are receiving more than their share of volume. Values above 1.00 indicate declining stocks are.

A session that looked one-sided

In the worked session example, 445 advancing issues versus 837 declining issues and advancing volume of 17892400 versus declining volume of 35374000 produced a reading of 1.05. The session sat near equilibrium even though declining issues outnumbered advancing issues by about two to one.

What daily closes usually showed

Across about six months of daily closes, most readings stayed near 1.00, with about 10 percent abnormally high and about 10 percent abnormally low. One day's close carried little information about the next day's close.

The normal zone against the index

A one-year scatter of S&P 500 net change against the same-day reading formed a dense normal band from the upper left, where prices were up and the reading was low, to the lower right, where prices were down and the reading was high. That dense historical cluster is the normal zone.

When a live pairing sits inside that band, later observations are described as tending to travel along the band's axis. When a pairing leaves the band, later action is described as tending to return toward it.

When the reading moves first

The reading is described as often changing before the market. A plot can move horizontally as the ratio shifts and only later vertically as the index follows. That short-horizon sequence is a leading horizontal move.

Direction and speed of change in the reading are treated as more informative than its absolute level. A rapid rise is described as a warning of a downward price swing, and a rapid fall as a warning of a rise.

The same watch on the tick tape

The same short-horizon watch is paired with the tape of upticks and downticks. Rapid joint changes, rather than static levels, are used to time both same-day decisions and the entry hour of positions that may be held for weeks. That running count of stocks whose latest print is an uptick or a downtick is the tick tape.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
10 of 40 in the Volume confirmation track
19911-4 pp.Next on Volume confirmationTick extremes that confirm double tops and bottomsTreat a double high or low as a working hypothesis only when an extreme-tick, scaled to that session's volume, appears at both tests.
All readings on this track · 40 readings
  1. 1988Constructing volume-confirmation overlays on OHLC spreadsheet charts
  2. 1989Commodity advance-decline from delivery months
  3. 1989The most-active list as a three-layer breadth lab
  4. 1989Constructing a yield-curve volume-breadth composite
  5. 1989A bond-futures case study in support, volume, and confirmation
  6. 1989Volume-scaled price boxes and volume cycles
  7. 1990Futures-signed on-balance volume construction
  8. 1990Self-relative volume boxes for news-free breakouts
  9. 1990Broadening swings, demand tests, and volume filters
  10. 1991A same-session pressure test of breadth and volume share
  11. 1991Tick extremes that confirm double tops and bottoms
  12. 1991Constructing auction fuel from volume and open interest
  13. 1994Constructing On-balance volume with smoothing and timeframe confirmation
  14. 1996A volume-gated moving-average trend combination
  15. 1996Constructing four-state range-volume bars
  16. 1997Failed trade review of a descending-triangle breakdown
  17. 1997Construct a head-and-shoulders before the neckline break
  18. 2004Volume confirmation is not optional for a head-and-shoulders reversal
  19. 2007Constructing a three-factor volume-price confirmation filter
  20. 2007Constructing a three-condition moving-average entry with a volume filter
  21. 2008Breakout rules that wait for volume and liquidity
  22. 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and volume
  23. 2011Filter executable futures with liquidity and open interest
  24. 2012Rank listed futures by liquidity before a forecast chooses the name
  25. 2012Filter futures liquidity using open interest and volume
  26. 2013Pre-trade futures liquidity as an execution filter
  27. 2014A futures liquidity screen from range, open interest and volume
  28. 2014Evaluating futures contract liquidity before execution
  29. 2014Constructing defended price lines from volume clusters
  30. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar size, open interest, and volume
  31. 2015Filter futures ideas by ranked contract liquidity
  32. 2017Screen listed futures for execution liquidity first
  33. 2017Filter futures orders by liquidity, open interest, and volume
  34. 2018Using open interest and volume to rank futures liquidity
  35. 2018Score listed futures as an execution menu before the setup
  36. 2019Filtering futures orders with liquidity, open interest and volume
  37. 2019Futures liquidity as an execution filter
  38. 2020A futures liquidity board as a pre-trade execution filter
  39. 2020Sequenced volume and golden-cross breakout rules
  40. 2020Use a listed-futures liquidity filter before execution
All 54 readings tagged Volume confirmation
Also on Volume confirmation5 readings