Skip to main content
Track Market profile
5 / 20
Library

1988issue C091-8

Constructing intraday trade-facilitation percentile tables

A same-session trade-facilitation score is assembled from three historical percentile ladders: cumulative half-hour time-price prints, ticks traversed, and their ratio. Official volume stays out of the live tables and is applied after the close as a fourth confirmation.

  • A same-session facilitation score is built from running time-price opportunities, ticks traversed, and their ratio, so the session can be graded before it closes.
  • Historical ladders came from 210 Treasury-bond auction-report days, sorted on the final-period total, averaged in groups of 10, and mapped to a 0-100 percent scale in 5 percent steps.
  • Split readings are treated as alerts rather than a single grade, and official volume is reserved as a fourth after-close confirmation.
  • The same arithmetic can be rebuilt for other futures once historical half-hour profiles exist.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What trade facilitation is measuring

Trade facilitation is whether an auction is still hosting two-sided participation, as opposed to drying up through a shrinking range and heavier time spent on each price. Sessions that stop facilitating trade over several days are described as showing falling volume, a narrowing range, and a rising number of time-price prints on each price increment.

A same-session facilitation measure is constructed from two running within-day counts: time-price opportunities and ticks traversed, with a third reading formed from their ratio. The market profile is the lettered half-hour price structure from which those running time-price totals and the facilitation look-ups are taken.

A time-price opportunity counts the prices printed inside a lettered half-hour bracket, and the running total of these prints is the raw input to the facilitation table. Tick count records how many minimum price increments the session has traversed so far and is used as a range-growth cross-check on the time-price count.

How the percentile ladders are built

The reference ladders were built from 210 Treasury-bond auction-report days from mid-October 1986 through 24 August 1987, a window chosen because it mixed advancing, declining, quiet, and active conditions.

Construction converts each day into a TPO line: a single day's series of running time-price totals at the close of each half-hour letter, from the opening bracket through the final bracket, lettered A through L. Those days are sorted on the final-period total, averaged in groups of 10 to produce 21 rows, and mapped onto a 0-100 percent scale in 5 percent steps. The mapped value is the trade-facilitation factor, a zero-to-one-hundred percentile that locates the current cumulative print or tick total against that compressed historical sample of like sessions.

Because the sort is anchored on the last period, earlier half-hour columns need not rise uniformly. A small group size of 10 days per average is given as the reason a middle column can show a local bump.

T-bond TPO facilitation ladder by half-hour bracket

A live T-bond session is graded by matching the running Time-Price Opportunity total in the current half-hour letter to these historical percentile paths. The upper path is the most active twentieth of the sample; the lower path is the quietest twentieth. A count sitting near the top path means the market is still facilitating trade; a count hugging the bottom path means it is not. All points are the published Figure 1 cells for the 100, 50 and 0 percent TFF rows.
A live T-bond session is graded by matching the running Time-Price Opportunity total in the current half-hour letter to these historical percentile paths. The upper path is the most active twentieth of the sample; the lower path is the quietest twentieth. A count sitting near the top path means the market is still facilitating trade; a count hugging the bottom path means it is not. All points are the published Figure 1 cells for the 100, 50 and 0 percent TFF rows.CBOT Treasury bond futures · Intraday half-hour brackets A through L · 1986-10-01T00:00:00.000Z to 1987-08-24T00:00:00.000Z

Ladders come from 210 T-bond Liquidity Data Bank days, mid-October 1986 through 24 August 1987, converted to cumulative TPO lines, sorted on the L-period total and averaged in groups of 10 days into 5-percentile steps. Earlier columns are not strictly monotonic because of those 10-day averages. The 0 percent L-period cell sits on the cropped right edge of the scan and is read as 53. Official volume is not in this live table.

Reading the print and tick tables

In the worked look-up, 86 time-price prints by period H sit next to a table value of 85 and read as an 85 percent facilitation score. The most active sample day reaches 215 prints, while the quietest row has 6 or fewer prints in A and 32 or fewer by G.

After-the-fact session snapshots span a near-zero reading on a quiet day with 34 prints and 8 ticks, mid-range 45 percent / 45 percent on a 99-print / 24-tick day, and very high readings on 185-print / 88-tick days.

The ratio ladder and split readings

The ratio ladder starts near 1.0 in period A. At the top of the sample it rises by somewhat less than a factor of three from A to L, while at the bottom it runs from 1 to 4.8, with the high ratios attributed to profiles that fatten when facilitation is low.

A split reading is treated as an alert rather than a single grade. One later snapshot showed 48 prints at period I for a 5 percent time-price score, about 55 percent on ticks, and a 2.1 print-to-tick ratio that mapped to 100 percent on the ratio table.

Volume as a fourth check after the close

Official volume is left out of the live tables because it was not available during the session. After the close it is specified as a fourth confirmation. Volume confirmation uses that official volume, once it exists, as a fourth cross-check that can accept or modify the three live facilitation readings.

Volume profile, the distribution of traded size across price, is treated here as an after-close check because live volume was not part of the daytime tables. The same arithmetic can be rebuilt for other futures once historical half-hour profiles exist.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
5 of 20 in the Market profile track
19881-4 pp.Next on Market profileConstructing session decisions from auction age and volumeA complete session report labels every traded price with its volume, the class of participant at that price, and the time period in which that price printed.
All readings on this track · 20 readings
  1. 1987Intraday Value Area construction from TPO counts
  2. 1987Constructing session market profiles from half-hour auctions
  3. 1988Volume value area versus time-print filters
  4. 1988Auction control from a price, volume, and time ledger
  5. 1988Constructing intraday trade-facilitation percentile tables
  6. 1988Constructing session decisions from auction age and volume
  7. 1989Range extension after the opening auction
  8. 1989Constructing value maps from auction volume overlays
  9. 1989The bull hook as a next-session opening-range breakout filter
  10. 1990Incomplete volume-at-price samples and auction reads
  11. 1990Constructing overlay profiles to map auction value
  12. 1990Constructing daily overlay profiles for auction brackets and breaks
  13. 1990Volume-confirmed facilitation as an execution gate for half-hour breakouts
  14. 1992Volume-box construction with named spreadsheet macros
  15. 1993Commercial volume caps outside the value area
  16. 1993Hourly participant volume as a live filter for day trades
  17. 1999Assembling the daily auction from time-price opportunities
  18. 2000Who accepted price first in the auction
  19. 2002Treat the session as an auction: find value, then judge the breakout
  20. 2002Auction structure, trader constraints, and the opening range
All 23 readings tagged Market profile
Also on Market profile5 readings