Skip to main content
Track Price-indicator divergence
3 / 16
Library

1990issue C071-2

Build a weekly leading sector composite from scaled transports and financials

A leading sector composite is assembled by scaling weekly closes of a transportation average with bank, insurance, and financial indices, then averaging them. Editorial reading: plot that finished series against an equity benchmark so a later high-low split can be treated as a regime check on a single stock or index idea, not as a standalone forecast.

  • Assemble the leading sector composite from four listed equity-group series: a transportation average, a bank index, an insurance index, and a financial index.
  • Those four series were selected because they appeared to lead the broader equity market over an intermediate horizon of eight weeks.
  • Use weekly construction and equal-weight scaling: divide the transportation close by three, triple the financial-index close, leave the bank and insurance closes unscaled, then average the four adjusted values.
  • Plot the finished series against a chosen equity benchmark. In October 1989 the composite formed lower highs while the industrial average formed higher highs, a split treated as a cautionary divergence, and further historical testing was still described as needed.
Entries in this reading2 entries

Four series in one composite

The leading sector composite is a single series formed by scaling and averaging a transportation average with bank, insurance, and financial indices. Those four listed equity-group series were selected because they appeared to lead the broader equity market over an intermediate horizon defined as eight weeks.

Weekly scaling before the average

The same construction can be run on daily or weekly closes. The documented example uses weekly construction, computing the composite from weekly closing levels rather than from daily prints.

Each weekly close is scaled before averaging. Equal-weight scaling divides the transportation series by three, multiplies the financial series by three, and leaves the bank and insurance series unscaled so no single leg dominates. The four adjusted values are then averaged.

Compare the composite with a benchmark

The finished series is plotted against a chosen equity benchmark so the two paths can be compared on the same chart. A benchmark split is a chart condition in which the composite and a tracked equity average print opposite sequences of highs or lows.

One comparison chart covers 65 weeks and ends on 9 March 1990. In October 1989 the composite formed lower highs while the industrial average formed higher highs, a split treated as a cautionary divergence.

Companion views still to test

Further historical testing was described as still needed. Point-and-figure charting and 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages were proposed as companion views.

Weekly DJIA versus the mixture index, Dec 1988–Mar 1990

Over this 65-week span the mixture of scaled transports and financials led the industrial average higher for about the first 40 weeks, then rolled into lower highs in late 1989 while the Dow kept printing higher highs—the divergence the article treats as a warning. Weekly closes were read off the dual-axis Figure 1 plot, not from a table.
Over this 65-week span the mixture of scaled transports and financials led the industrial average higher for about the first 40 weeks, then rolled into lower highs in late 1989 while the Dow kept printing higher highs—the divergence the article treats as a warning. Weekly closes were read off the dual-axis Figure 1 plot, not from a table.DJIA vs mixture index (DJTA, NASDAQ bank, NASDAQ insurance, NYSE Financial) · W · 1988-12-16T00:00:00.000Z to 1990-03-09T00:00:00.000Z

Axis numerals on the scan are degraded and the frame is inverted relative to a conventional high-at-top plot; y-values are approximate weekly closes taken from the printed scales (Dow at 200-point steps, mixture at 20-point steps) after restoring that orientation. No source table was printed.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
3 of 16 in the Price-indicator divergence track
19901-2 pp.Next on Price-indicator divergenceConstructing stochastic K and D lines and divergence cuesA stochastic oscillator is a 0-to-100 reading that locates the latest close inside a chosen window of the highest high and lowest low.
All readings on this track · 16 readings
  1. 1989Volume confirmation windows and exponential average construction
  2. 1990Constructing stochastic %K and %D from range position
  3. 1990Build a weekly leading sector composite from scaled transports and financials
  4. 1990Constructing stochastic K and D lines and divergence cues
  5. 1993Relative strength index events depend on the chosen input combination
  6. 1995Constructing a dual-horizon force index
  7. 1996Building a range-normalized divergence index from relative strength index
  8. 1998Treat RSI as a testable filter rather than a trigger
  9. 1999Primary-cycle windows, then stochastic confirmation
  10. 1999Stochastic rules versus buy and hold
  11. 2001Constructing confirmation filters for RSI overbought and oversold extremes
  12. 2003Constructing divergence-equivalent relative strength index and stochastic oscillators
  13. 2003Reverse-engineered RSI as a next-close projection
  14. 2003Scoring open versus resolved relative strength divergences
  15. 2003Bull-and-bear-balance from OHLC bar patterns
  16. 2003Constructing bull and bear balance from session paths
All 19 readings tagged Price-indicator divergence
Also on Price-indicator divergence5 readings