1990issue C111-6
Constructing wave targets from ratios, triangles and trendlines
Editorial framing: treat a wave count as a drafting problem. Lock impulse legs to a 1 to 1.618 to 1 skeleton, construct a fifth-wave target from contracting-triangle width after breakout, then replace a flat 0.618 level with a sloping line that carries that ratio through time.
- An elliott-wave count has to stay internally consistent before impulse-proportion, contracting-triangle, or trendline measurements are applied.
- Waves 1, 3, and 5 are drafted in a 1 to 1.618 to 1 impulse-proportion. On the illustrated Treasury bond decline, wave 3 exceeded the ideal 1.618 length by 2/32.
- A fourth-wave contracting-triangle built from five a-b-c corrections supplies a triangle-width-objective for the last thrust. Ignoring an e-wave-overshoot produced an apex later treated as a pivot.
- After five waves down complete wave 1 of larger degree, the expected wave-2 pullback is a ratio-anchored-trendline through the 0.618 mark, not a flat fibonacci-retracement.
A wave count as a drafting problem
Editorial reading: this archive workflow treats a wave count as a drafting problem. An elliott-wave count is a labeled impulse-and-correction count that must stay internally consistent before any ratio, triangle, or trendline measurement is applied.
Once the labels hold, impulse legs are locked to a 1 to 1.618 to 1 skeleton, a contracting-triangle supplies the last-wave target, and a 0.618 fibonacci-retracement is carried forward as a sloping trendline rather than as a flat price.
Lock impulse legs to a 1 to 1.618 to 1 skeleton
Impulse-proportion is the drafting rule that waves 1, 3, and 5 of an impulse are laid out in a 1 to 1.618 to 1 length relationship.
That impulse-proportion construction was illustrated on a Treasury bond decline from the August 1989 high of 101.08 to the May 1990 low of 88.07.
In the illustrated bond sequence, wave 3 exceeded the ideal 1.618 impulse proportion by 2/32.
Construct a fifth-wave target from a contracting-triangle
A contracting-triangle is a five-leg a-b-c corrective container, typically a fourth wave, whose width and apex set the last-wave target and a timing mark. A fourth-wave contracting triangle is constructed from five a-b-c corrections and is treated as the pattern that typically precedes the final thrust of the larger move.
After a triangle breakout, the minimum fifth-wave objective equals the widest part of the triangle, measured from the breakout as the A-to-B distance subtracted from penetration of the lower trendline. That length is the triangle-width-objective: a fifth-wave length taken from the widest span of the triangle and applied from the breakout or from penetration of the lower boundary.
The upper triangle boundary is drawn by ignoring an e-wave-overshoot, a fifth triangle leg that briefly crosses a boundary and is omitted when that boundary is drawn. That construction produced an apex that converged on May 4, with an apex price of 9226 later treated as a support and resistance pivot.
Replace a flat 0.618 level with a sloping line
A fibonacci-retracement is a 0.618 pullback of a completed swing, used here as an anchor point rather than as a standalone horizontal target. A trendline is a sloping boundary that converts a static price ratio into a time-dependent objective or triangle edge.
After five waves down that complete wave 1 of larger degree, the expected wave-2 pullback is a trendline from the start of the move through the 0.618 retracement marked above wave 1’s low, not a flat 0.618 price. That construction is a ratio-anchored-trendline: a line from the origin of a decline through the 0.618 mark above the wave-1 low, so the expected pullback is the line rather than a fixed price.
The 61.8 percent retracement of the 101-08 to 88-07 decline is 96-09. A line from 101-08 through 96-09 stood at 9512 in the week the June contract reached 9510.
All readings on this track · 53 readings
- 1984Constructing the slow stochastic from a five-session range
- 1985Gold-proxy trendlines and a January support base
- 1988Construct a five-week new-highs total as a breadth chart
- 1988Stacked channel, trendline, and moving-average warnings in 1987
- 1989Auditing fifth-wave counts with equality, Fibonacci, and trendlines
- 1990Money-fund maturity as a companion Eurodollar chart
- 1990Constructing wave targets from ratios, triangles and trendlines
- 1992Nested time frames for trend and channel signals
- 1992A pre-trade checklist for trendline breaks and loss limits
- 1992Bond-fund timing inside trendlines, retracements, and dual averages
- 1992Two-point trendline construction from rise over run
- 1993Disposable chart ratings from confirmed level tests
- 1993When trend channels define fair value after dislocations
- 1993Valid trendline anchors for three-part reversals
- 1994Pairing stochastic divergence with trendline invalidation
- 1995Constructing measured targets after trendline breaks
- 1997A three-part pullback plan with RSI, Fibonacci retracements, and a tight trendline
- 1998Rule-based Trendline construction for testable entries
- 2000Constructing trendlines, breaks, and role reversal
- 2000Constructing speed resistance lines from trend extremes
- 2000Nasdaq tech cycle stages with a 15-day average and trendlines
- 2002Two-session candlesticks that test support, resistance, and trendlines
- 2002Constructing Fibonacci ratio grids from a peak and a trough
- 2002Evaluate trendline geometry before trusting a breakout
- 2002Trendline, volume, and breakout hypotheses versus cycle-end stories
- 2003Writing the long S&P 500 trendline and cycle junction as one hypothesis
- 2003A three-event trendline reversal checklist
- 2003Reverse-engineered Relative Strength Index price curves
- 2003Two-anchor trendline construction without cut-through
- 2004Treat a 15-minute e-mini stair-step as congestion under a daily lid
- 2005A 50-day average, a trendline break, and an open barrier flip
- 2005Matching a forty-day average to a crude trendline
- 2006Constructing a relative spread-strength oscillator for staged cycle confirmation
- 2006Constructing a log-change probability line for trend and range rules
- 2007Linked cross breaks as dollar-pair filters
- 2007A case study in support, resistance, and trendline role reversal on currency charts
- 2007Reading trendline breaks in a housing-sector case
- 2007Constructing replaceable trendlines for break signals
- 2007Reading trendline breaks before the mechanical signal
- 2007Trading choppy forex trends with channels and Fibonacci breaks
- 2007A stacked hypothesis from wave, trendline, ratio, and candle
- 2008Exit rules before entry: trendline, support, and stops
- 2008Capitulation headlines need trend confirmation
- 2008RSI divergence classes, ratio thresholds, and trendline tests
- 2010Support and resistance as falsifiable chart hypotheses
- 2012Reading a 2012 software directory as a breakout and channel case study
- 2013Treat a currency position as a regime, then map shared levels
- 2014Evaluating trendline swing size per market
- 2018Intermarket regime stress and the January 2018 trendline break
- 2018Weekly and daily Stochastic oscillator construction on a single daily chart
- 2018Constructing trendlines, support, and breakout targets from crowd exits
- 2019Trendline break and Fibonacci retracement as a falsifiable outlook check
- 2019Monthly S&P 500 false-break versus the decade trendline