2003issue C031-4
A three-event trendline reversal checklist
A suspected top or bottom is framed as a two-proof chart problem. A correctly drawn trendline has to break, the old extreme has to fail on the retest, and only a later close through nearby support or resistance is allowed to rewrite the directional case.
- The teaching problem is not whether a strong advance or decline can end, but how to wait for the market to invalidate its own trend twice, via a trendline break and a failed retest, rather than fading solely because a move looks extended.
- On an advance, the trendline joins the lowest low to the highest low immediately before the highest high without crossing intervening bars, with resistance at that high and support at that low.
- A close through the nearby horizontal support or resistance is the third event, the breakout that completes the reversal sequence.
- A brief push through a horizontal barrier that fails to follow through and closes back on the other side is a trap, not a confirmed continuation.
The teaching problem
The teaching problem is not whether a strong advance or decline can end. It is how to wait for the market to invalidate its own trend twice, via a trendline break and a failed retest, rather than fading solely because a move looks extended.
How the lines are drawn
For an advance, a correctly drawn trendline joins the lowest low to the highest low immediately before the highest high without crossing intervening price bars. A horizontal resistance is then placed at that highest high and a horizontal support at that highest low.
Those support and resistance levels bound the later retest and mark where a close would complete the reversal.
Three conditions on the December note
The first reversal condition is a break of that trendline. In the December 10-year note case, the line was broken by a downside gap on October 15.
The second condition is a failed retest. After the trendline breaks, price cannot recover the old extreme and therefore fails to restore the prior trend's momentum. In that note case the contract peaked on November 11, and the down day on November 14 was treated as the first usable confirmation of that peak.
The third condition is a close through the nearby horizontal support or resistance. That close is the breakout that completes the sequence. In the note example that support sat near 112, and the illustrated short after condition 2 sat just below the November 14 low near 113, with a protective stop above the high near 115.
A first measured-move objective
A measured-move sketch took the distance from support at 112 to resistance at 116.35, about 4.35, and subtracted it from support to estimate an objective near 107.65 if the third condition completed. That distance is the span from the recent correction low to the trend peak, projected beyond the broken horizontal level to sketch a first objective.
December T-note still waiting on a close through 112

32nds on the TradeStation scale were read as decimal points. Sampling is weekly plus the dated events the article names (15 October break, 11 November peak, 14 November down day). Intra-week highs and lows are not recovered.
The same sequence in December wheat
December wheat followed the same sequence. A trendline break arrived in early October. A rally from below 366 then stalled just above 412 without a new high. The trendline was broken again on November 5, with a close at 400 6/8.
When the second proof fails
The S&P 500 met the first condition with the November 7 to 11 decline and found support near 870. Condition 2 required a failure to exceed the November 6 high of 926.50, but on November 22 the index printed an intraday high of 937.50.
Editorial reading: because the old extreme was recovered, the failed-retest proof did not stand, so the reversal case was not rewritten by a later breakout.
A brief move through a horizontal barrier that then fails to follow through and closes back on the other side of that level, around 925 in the S&P illustration, can be classified as a bull or bear trap rather than a confirmed continuation. A bull trap is that pattern when the brief push is through resistance and the close returns below the barrier.
All readings on this track · 53 readings
- 1984Constructing the slow stochastic from a five-session range
- 1985Gold-proxy trendlines and a January support base
- 1988Construct a five-week new-highs total as a breadth chart
- 1988Stacked channel, trendline, and moving-average warnings in 1987
- 1989Auditing fifth-wave counts with equality, Fibonacci, and trendlines
- 1990Money-fund maturity as a companion Eurodollar chart
- 1990Constructing wave targets from ratios, triangles and trendlines
- 1992Nested time frames for trend and channel signals
- 1992A pre-trade checklist for trendline breaks and loss limits
- 1992Bond-fund timing inside trendlines, retracements, and dual averages
- 1992Two-point trendline construction from rise over run
- 1993Disposable chart ratings from confirmed level tests
- 1993When trend channels define fair value after dislocations
- 1993Valid trendline anchors for three-part reversals
- 1994Pairing stochastic divergence with trendline invalidation
- 1995Constructing measured targets after trendline breaks
- 1997A three-part pullback plan with RSI, Fibonacci retracements, and a tight trendline
- 1998Rule-based Trendline construction for testable entries
- 2000Constructing trendlines, breaks, and role reversal
- 2000Constructing speed resistance lines from trend extremes
- 2000Nasdaq tech cycle stages with a 15-day average and trendlines
- 2002Two-session candlesticks that test support, resistance, and trendlines
- 2002Constructing Fibonacci ratio grids from a peak and a trough
- 2002Evaluate trendline geometry before trusting a breakout
- 2002Trendline, volume, and breakout hypotheses versus cycle-end stories
- 2003Writing the long S&P 500 trendline and cycle junction as one hypothesis
- 2003A three-event trendline reversal checklist
- 2003Reverse-engineered Relative Strength Index price curves
- 2003Two-anchor trendline construction without cut-through
- 2004Treat a 15-minute e-mini stair-step as congestion under a daily lid
- 2005A 50-day average, a trendline break, and an open barrier flip
- 2005Matching a forty-day average to a crude trendline
- 2006Constructing a relative spread-strength oscillator for staged cycle confirmation
- 2006Constructing a log-change probability line for trend and range rules
- 2007Linked cross breaks as dollar-pair filters
- 2007A case study in support, resistance, and trendline role reversal on currency charts
- 2007Reading trendline breaks in a housing-sector case
- 2007Constructing replaceable trendlines for break signals
- 2007Reading trendline breaks before the mechanical signal
- 2007Trading choppy forex trends with channels and Fibonacci breaks
- 2007A stacked hypothesis from wave, trendline, ratio, and candle
- 2008Exit rules before entry: trendline, support, and stops
- 2008Capitulation headlines need trend confirmation
- 2008RSI divergence classes, ratio thresholds, and trendline tests
- 2010Support and resistance as falsifiable chart hypotheses
- 2012Reading a 2012 software directory as a breakout and channel case study
- 2013Treat a currency position as a regime, then map shared levels
- 2014Evaluating trendline swing size per market
- 2018Intermarket regime stress and the January 2018 trendline break
- 2018Weekly and daily Stochastic oscillator construction on a single daily chart
- 2018Constructing trendlines, support, and breakout targets from crowd exits
- 2019Trendline break and Fibonacci retracement as a falsifiable outlook check
- 2019Monthly S&P 500 false-break versus the decade trendline