Skip to main content
Track Dow Theory
27 / 29
Library

2008issue C041-5

Intermediate confirmation outranks secular phasing

A joint Dow Theory break of prior secondary highs or lows is the working primary trend. That intermediate confirmation outranks a longer-horizon phase story, and a separate cycle-turn indicator is used only to time the same horizon.

  • A primary uptrend is confirmed when both the industrials and the transports better their previous secondary high. A primary downtrend is confirmed when both fall below their previous secondary low. The utilities average is not part of that pair.
  • Once a primary trend is confirmed, it remains the working assumption until a joint opposite confirmation appears. Longer-horizon market phasing can conflict with that signal but does not replace it.
  • A nonconfirmation is a warning, not a completed trend-change signal. The opposite primary trend is confirmed only when both averages jointly break the relevant secondary point.
  • A separate intermediate cycle-turn indicator can mark direction changes at the same horizon as secondary-point confirmation. It is not part of Dow Theory and does not rewrite the confirmation rule.
Entries in this reading3 entries

The confirmation pair

A confirmed primary trend at the intermediate horizon can disagree with a longer-horizon reading of bull and bear stages. The historical workflow below keeps those jobs separate.

A basic Dow Theory primary uptrend is confirmed when both the industrials and the transports better their previous secondary high. A primary downtrend is confirmed when both fall below their previous secondary low. Those secondary high points and secondary low points are intermediate swing extremes. The utilities average is not part of that pair.

When phasing and confirmation disagree

After the 2002 low, both averages bettered the first post-low secondary highs by June 2003. Under the basic rule, that joint move marked a primary uptrend. Longer-term market phasing around the 2000 top still framed the rise as possibly countertrend.

A joint break of prior secondary lows on February 25, 2000 had already marked a primary downtrend. The decline into 2002 was read by some observers as the first leg of a larger secular bear. That longer-horizon reading then overshadowed the 2003 uptrend confirmation.

Giving that longer-term phasing more weight than the 2003 primary-uptrend confirmation was later judged an error. Once a primary trend is confirmed, it remains the working assumption until a joint opposite confirmation appears.

Warnings stay warnings until both averages confirm

Joint nonconfirmations during the advance were treated as warnings rather than sell signals. A nonconfirmation is a state in which one average makes a new secondary extreme while the other does not.

After the July 19, 2007 joint high, an October 2007 nonconfirmation became a confirmed primary bearish change on November 21, 2007, when both averages closed below the August 2007 secondary lows.

That November 21, 2007 event was described as the first confirmed primary bearish trend change since the rally from the 2002-03 lows. The same confirmation rule then kept that bearish primary trend in force until a confirmed bullish negation.

Cycle work times the same horizon

The 2002-2007 sequence was used to argue that intermediate crossings of prior secondary highs and lows matter more than long-horizon phasing or short-term noise. Cycle work, while not part of Dow Theory, points to the same intermediate horizon.

A separate intermediate cycle-turn indicator was used as a trend filter. It was described as turning down near the October 2007 high, turning up at the November 2007 low, turning down in late December, and turning up in late January 2008. As of mid-February 2008 it remained positive against the November 21, 2007 primary bearish backdrop.

Editorial: keep that cycle-turn indicator on the same intermediate horizon as secondary-point confirmation, and use it to time that horizon rather than to rewrite the confirmation rule.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
27 of 29 in the Dow Theory track
201218-25 pp.Next on Dow TheoryAlign swings to nested energy regimesOscillator and momentum-crossover signals can stay saturated through long one-way swings, and a higher price high against a lower indicator high is not a nearby-reversal cue when restoring pullbacks keep printing that pattern.
All readings on this track · 29 readings
  1. 1982A bounded-risk entry separates a forecast from a trend
  2. 1984Critiquing reward bias, single-scale charts, and exact-turn forecasts
  3. 1990Constructing dual-average primary-trend confirmation
  4. 1991Two-average confirmation before a primary reversal call
  5. 1991Delayed confirmation is not Dow Theory divergence
  6. 1991Confirmation delay and breadth divergence in a two-average case
  7. 1992Utilities as a rate-regime lead for equities
  8. 1992Critiquing unconfirmed Dow rallies with volume
  9. 1993When Dow Theory signals fail after the decision-makers change
  10. 1994Market life expectancy as a risk filter
  11. 1994Score industrial and transport sync before calling an intermediate-trend signal
  12. 1997A 1995 industrial-average breakout mapped from component trends
  13. 1998Confirm Dow trends with Market breadth and Head and shoulders
  14. 1999Confirming an equity idea with rate, commodity, and index spreads
  15. 2001Why trend, range, and Dow rules need separate tests
  16. 2001Bear-market confirmation via prior correction troughs
  17. 2002Constructing a Dow line before breakout confirmation
  18. 2002Two-average confirmation as a swing-by-swing classroom drill
  19. 2002Withhold the hypothesis until the second average confirms: a 2001 case
  20. 2002A primary-bear case study in cycle speed, Dow theory, and pattern legs
  21. 2003Four index proxies as a bear-regime dashboard
  22. 2004Dual-average confirmation at shared prior highs
  23. 2004Confirmation as the second clock on a trend break
  24. 2004The confirmation-reaction planning window after a joint break
  25. 2005Dow confirmation as a two-average trend test
  26. 2008Related-average confirmation lag after a correction
  27. 2008Intermediate confirmation outranks secular phasing
  28. 2012Align swings to nested energy regimes
  29. 2016From nonconfirmation to a bearish primary trend change
All 29 readings tagged Dow Theory
Also on Dow Theory5 readings