Skip to main content
Track Dow Theory
4 / 29
Library

1991issue C031-7

Two-average confirmation before a primary reversal call

Keep a primary-trend call open until both the industrial and transportation averages complete a timed secondary reaction or line and a later close through the initial low. A later inverted head-and-shoulders can recast the preceding trough as an initial-low hypothesis rather than as proof of a completed primary reversal.

  • A primary buy or sell is valid only when both the industrial and transportation averages reverse. Until that joint confirmation, the prior signal remains in force even if the two series drift apart.
  • A sell needs a qualified decline, then a secondary reaction or a valid line, and only later a close below the initial low. The earlier high, first low, and lower secondary high are named only after that closing break.
  • A rebound that is too short, or a pause that is too thin, too wide, or too close to the top of the range, does not reverse a primary advance or resolve a year-long divergence.
  • An inverted head-and-shoulders with a downward-sloping neckline can recast a mid-October trough as the initial low of a possible secondary recovery, not as proof that a primary decline was already complete.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Keep the prior signal in force

A primary buy or sell is treated as valid only when both the industrial and transportation averages reverse. Until that joint reversal, the prior signal remains in force even if the two series drift apart over an intermediate stretch.

Confirmation requires both averages to complete the same reversal sequence. A move unique to one average is not treated as a market-wide primary signal. Divergence is a split in which one series makes new highs or new lows that the other does not confirm, leaving the primary-trend call unresolved.

Wait for the timed secondary or line

A sell construction requires both averages to fall at least 8-10 percent, then either retrace one to two thirds over three weeks to three months or form a line of about 5 percent or less lasting from two or three weeks to three months, and finally close below the initial low.

A secondary reaction is a rebound or pullback that retraces about one to two thirds of the prior swing over three weeks to three months and can set up that later closing break. A line is a narrow sideways band, typically about 5 percent or less and lasting from two or three weeks to three months, that may stand in for a secondary reaction if it consolidates the prior swing.

The initial low is the first trough after an important high. Only the later close below the first low can be labeled a secondary low when it prints. The earlier high, first low, and lower secondary high are identified only after that closing break.

A year-long split after October 1989

After October 1989, new industrial highs reaffirmed the buy already in force from the 1987 lows, but the transports' own decline left the two averages unconfirmed for nearly a year.

Because the industrials had repeatedly found support near 2500 after October 1989, an early-August pause above that shelf was not treated as enough to call a primary decline. A more conservative reading waits for a rally and a later close through the first trough.

Failed secondaries and failed lines

The industrials' rebound from the August 23, 1990 low retraced about 35 percent on an intraday basis and 29 percent on closes, yet lasted only days to two and a half weeks, so it failed the duration and closing-price tests for a valid secondary reaction.

Candidate line consolidations after the July 1990 high were judged too short, too wide, or too concentrated near the top of the range to substitute for a secondary reaction, so no valid sell had been generated by mid-January 1991.

A nine-day industrial pause near 2680 and an eight-day transport consolidation fell short of the two-week line minimum and were treated as too thin a basis for reversing a primary advance or resolving a year-long divergence.

Recast the October trough as an initial low

The October 1990 lows left an open classification problem. If both averages had already closed below valid secondaries, a primary decline would be in force, but a later split at those lows could instead mark the start of a renewed primary advance.

After the mid-October low, an inverted head-and-shoulders with a downward-sloping neckline completed a November 12 upside break. By year-end the industrials had retraced nearly half of the prior decline, recasting that trough as the initial low of a possible secondary recovery.

In this reading the inverted bottom is a later-stage pattern. A downward-sloping neckline break can recast the preceding trough as an initial low rather than as a completed primary-trend signal.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
4 of 29 in the Dow Theory track
19911-9 pp.Next on Dow TheoryDelayed confirmation is not Dow Theory divergenceA Dow Theory inference is treated as reliable only when two independent averages move together. A reading from one unconfirmed average is regarded as likely to mislead.
All readings on this track · 29 readings
  1. 1982A bounded-risk entry separates a forecast from a trend
  2. 1984Critiquing reward bias, single-scale charts, and exact-turn forecasts
  3. 1990Constructing dual-average primary-trend confirmation
  4. 1991Two-average confirmation before a primary reversal call
  5. 1991Delayed confirmation is not Dow Theory divergence
  6. 1991Confirmation delay and breadth divergence in a two-average case
  7. 1992Utilities as a rate-regime lead for equities
  8. 1992Critiquing unconfirmed Dow rallies with volume
  9. 1993When Dow Theory signals fail after the decision-makers change
  10. 1994Market life expectancy as a risk filter
  11. 1994Score industrial and transport sync before calling an intermediate-trend signal
  12. 1997A 1995 industrial-average breakout mapped from component trends
  13. 1998Confirm Dow trends with Market breadth and Head and shoulders
  14. 1999Confirming an equity idea with rate, commodity, and index spreads
  15. 2001Why trend, range, and Dow rules need separate tests
  16. 2001Bear-market confirmation via prior correction troughs
  17. 2002Constructing a Dow line before breakout confirmation
  18. 2002Two-average confirmation as a swing-by-swing classroom drill
  19. 2002Withhold the hypothesis until the second average confirms: a 2001 case
  20. 2002A primary-bear case study in cycle speed, Dow theory, and pattern legs
  21. 2003Four index proxies as a bear-regime dashboard
  22. 2004Dual-average confirmation at shared prior highs
  23. 2004Confirmation as the second clock on a trend break
  24. 2004The confirmation-reaction planning window after a joint break
  25. 2005Dow confirmation as a two-average trend test
  26. 2008Related-average confirmation lag after a correction
  27. 2008Intermediate confirmation outranks secular phasing
  28. 2012Align swings to nested energy regimes
  29. 2016From nonconfirmation to a bearish primary trend change
All 29 readings tagged Dow Theory
Also on Dow Theory5 readings