Skip to main content
Track Dow Theory
11 / 29
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

1994issue C111-6

Score industrial and transport sync before calling an intermediate-trend signal

Confirmation treats a market swing as more reliable when a production-sector average and a goods-movement average move together in direction and intensity. This archive article turns that two-average chart into a classroom checklist: score the sync first, then read a delayed transport high trapped in a line-formation as resistance-capped nonconfirmation rather than a finished intermediate-trend signal.

  • Confirmation is a two-average breadth test: an important swing is treated as more reliable when the industrial and transportation averages advance or decline together in both direction and intensity.
  • A lasting move is described as needing primary-secondary-participation, with blue-chip industrials and secondary transports both joining the swing.
  • Divergence is applied most usefully to the intermediate-trend, as a warning about the next month or two, not as an automatic major-trend label.
  • A late transport high that only returns to the top of a line-formation is a support-resistance check for nonconfirmation, not proof that the intermediate-trend signal is complete.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackDow Theory29 readingsPrice-indicator divergence142 readingsSupport and resistance170 readings

What confirmation measures

Dow Theory confirmation treats an important market swing as more reliable when a production-sector average and a goods-movement average advance or decline together.

The industrial average is assigned to production of goods and services, and the transportation average to the movement of those goods.

A confirmation reading is meant to ask whether the two averages match in direction and intensity, not only whether they jointly break a prior high or low.

When the averages split

When the averages are out of sync, the split is treated as a possible sign of economic deterioration and a precursor to a change in trend.

The industrials are treated as primary blue-chip issues and the transports as secondary issues. A lasting market move is described as requiring participation from both.

Two 1992 confirmation checks

In spring 1992 the industrial average reached new bull-market highs while the transportation average lost ground, and the industrials later declined sharply.

In October 1992 the industrials made new lows while the transports held. A turn stronger in the previously weaker average after a long decline is treated as a sign that a reaction is ending.

Divergence on the intermediate-trend

Divergence is applied most usefully to the intermediate-trend: an industrial advance without transport confirmation implies a possible shakeout over the following month or two.

Other price patterns are required before calling more than a severe intermediate correction.

A delayed high inside a line-formation

From the April 1994 lows through summer, the industrials rose while the transports lagged. A June 16 transport closing high arrived after nearly three months of industrial strength and only returned to the top of a 1540-1660 line.

After a mid-June 1994 shakeout the industrials later moved above 3800, while the transports formed a 1570-1630 line and again met resistance near 1660.

Dow Jones Transports weekly, early 1994: delayed high trapped in a line

Weekly Transport average in 1994 first sold off from the mid-1800s into the mid-1500s, then printed a delayed rebound high that stalled under the mid-1670s ceiling of a sideways line-formation instead of confirming a new industrial advance. Values are approximate weekly closes read off the source ChartBook weekly bar chart (not a table).
Weekly Transport average in 1994 first sold off from the mid-1800s into the mid-1500s, then printed a delayed rebound high that stalled under the mid-1670s ceiling of a sideways line-formation instead of confirming a new industrial advance. Values are approximate weekly closes read off the source ChartBook weekly bar chart (not a table).Dow Jones Transportation Average (#TRAN) · Weekly · 1994-01-07T00:00:00.000Z to 1994-08-12T00:00:00.000Z

Digitized from weekly high-low bars on the 1993 ChartBook raster; closes are approximate to the nearest 5–10 index points. Horizontal lines on the source mark the line-formation band, not extra plotted series.

Editorial scoring order

Editorial reading: treat that delayed transport high as a support-resistance event at the top of a line-formation, not as confirmation that an intermediate-trend signal is complete.

Editorial sequence: first score whether the two averages share direction and intensity. Then ask whether the new print is a genuine breakout or only a return to a known cap. Failure of the transports to match in intensity or timely participation is nonconfirmation.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
11 of 29 in the Dow Theory track
19971-8 pp.Next on Dow TheoryA 1995 industrial-average breakout mapped from component trendsA June 1995 note assembled more than 150 chart examples, including seven Dow Jones Industrial Average components, to argue that component uptrends could support a much higher average after the early 1995 breakout through 4000.
All readings on this track · 29 readings
  1. 1982A bounded-risk entry separates a forecast from a trend
  2. 1984Critiquing reward bias, single-scale charts, and exact-turn forecasts
  3. 1990Constructing dual-average primary-trend confirmation
  4. 1991Two-average confirmation before a primary reversal call
  5. 1991Delayed confirmation is not Dow Theory divergence
  6. 1991Confirmation delay and breadth divergence in a two-average case
  7. 1992Utilities as a rate-regime lead for equities
  8. 1992Critiquing unconfirmed Dow rallies with volume
  9. 1993When Dow Theory signals fail after the decision-makers change
  10. 1994Market life expectancy as a risk filter
  11. 1994Score industrial and transport sync before calling an intermediate-trend signal
  12. 1997A 1995 industrial-average breakout mapped from component trends
  13. 1998Confirm Dow trends with Market breadth and Head and shoulders
  14. 1999Confirming an equity idea with rate, commodity, and index spreads
  15. 2001Why trend, range, and Dow rules need separate tests
  16. 2001Bear-market confirmation via prior correction troughs
  17. 2002Constructing a Dow line before breakout confirmation
  18. 2002Two-average confirmation as a swing-by-swing classroom drill
  19. 2002Withhold the hypothesis until the second average confirms: a 2001 case
  20. 2002A primary-bear case study in cycle speed, Dow theory, and pattern legs
  21. 2003Four index proxies as a bear-regime dashboard
  22. 2004Dual-average confirmation at shared prior highs
  23. 2004Confirmation as the second clock on a trend break
  24. 2004The confirmation-reaction planning window after a joint break
  25. 2005Dow confirmation as a two-average trend test
  26. 2008Related-average confirmation lag after a correction
  27. 2008Intermediate confirmation outranks secular phasing
  28. 2012Align swings to nested energy regimes
  29. 2016From nonconfirmation to a bearish primary trend change
By fieldTrend and channels181 readingsBy year199483 readings
All 29 readings tagged Dow Theory
Also on Dow Theory5 readings
1991Delayed confirmation is not Dow Theory divergence1991Confirmation delay and breadth divergence in a two-average case1991Two-average confirmation before a primary reversal call1992Critiquing unconfirmed Dow rallies with volume1999Confirming an equity idea with rate, commodity, and index spreads