1984issue C061-7
Stock low clusters as a cycle baseline
A monthly census of isolated individual-stock lows is the quantitative timing baseline. Weekly double bottoms and inverted head-and-shoulders are then scored only as late, fallible labels for whether that baseline has already printed.
- Isolated lows were counted month by month across 1000 actively traded issues and used as the cycle baseline.
- Between major bear-market troughs those lows still clustered every one to three years, averaging under two years, with more prints in the fourth quarter than in the first.
- Double-bottom shapes appeared well before the eventual isolated low, while inverted head-and-shoulders usually finished after a large share of the rebound.
- About 76 percent of the catalogued lows were irregular or sharp rather than a clean chart formation.
Count the isolated lows first
A 35-year sample of 1000 actively traded issues was used to count how many individual stocks printed an isolated low in each month. An isolated low was defined as the trough of a sizable decline that was followed by a sizable rise and was not undercut within one year on either side.
The bunching that sets the baseline
Between major bear-market troughs, those isolated lows still clustered at intervals of one to three years, averaging under two years. Summing the monthly counts across 35 years, and reviewing 98 years of industrial-average slumps scored from one to four in depth, showed more isolated lows in the fourth calendar quarter than in the first.
Weekly shapes as fallible labels
More than 3000 weekly bottom formations were judged by eye. Double-bottom shapes were observed to appear well before the eventual isolated low. Inverted head-and-shoulders bottoms were judged limited because the second shoulder usually completed after a large share of the rebound had already occurred. About 76 percent of the catalogued lows were described as irregular or sharp rather than a clean chart formation.
A 1981-1983 weekly case
A 1981-1983 weekly case showed an intermediate January 1981 low, a later double top, a five-month decline, and a sharp rebound in the first week of January 1982. Editorial reading: a later double top can cancel an earlier rebound reading, so the weekly structure is a signal hypothesis rather than proof that the isolated-low clock has struck.
All readings on this track · 37 readings
- 1982Head and shoulders as a three-path completion test
- 1984Stock low clusters as a cycle baseline
- 1985Four-phase construction of the head-and-shoulders reversal
- 1989Volume-confirmed reversal patterns, stops, and measured objectives
- 1991The journal as one checklist for taken and skipped trades
- 1991Head and shoulders as a direction hypothesis
- 1991Candlestick body and shadow construction with three-Buddha peaks
- 1992A three-count drill that binds candlesticks, head and shoulders, and entry rules
- 1997Constructing bump and run reversal channels
- 1998Testing reversal formations in bond futures
- 1999Construction first: extra shoulders, the neckline, and the diamond test
- 1999Dead-cat bounce, rollover, and failed reversals
- 1999Evaluating time gaps in bond reversal patterns
- 2000Constructing head and shoulders and double reversal patterns
- 2001Constructing broadening and complex bottoms
- 2001Constructing a slanted head-and-shoulders when the chart is tilted
- 2002Head and shoulders with dominant-cycle timing
- 2002Trendline breaks, right shoulders, and trailing stops
- 2003Confirmation tests for bearish top patterns
- 2003Commodity top hypotheses on a dollar rebound
- 2003A head-and-shoulders test during a bear rally
- 2004Pattern breakouts need a primary-trend filter
- 2004Reading candlestick closes on trendline and neckline tests
- 2004Candle diagnosis needs Western targets and stops
- 2004Head-and-shoulders neckline construction
- 2005A familiar chart condition is a hypothesis, not a completed decision
- 2005A 50-day ceiling and a rising-floor stalemate
- 2006A complete trading plan from philosophy to checklist
- 2006Thin-market head and shoulders with two averages and MACD confirmation
- 2010Head and shoulders as a playback-tested setup
- 2011Turning a head-and-shoulders outline into a breakout hypothesis
- 2011Volume-confirmed head and shoulders on AIG and Citigroup in 2007
- 2013Constructing head-and-shoulders milestone points
- 2013Head-and-shoulders geometry versus the filter stack
- 2013Algorithmic head-and-shoulders construction
- 2018International relative strength as a double-top case study
- 2019Structure invalidation before comfort-stops