1989issue C051-8
Volume-confirmed reversal patterns, stops, and measured objectives
These archive cases treat a reversal as a checklist, not a picture. Volume-fade at the late peak, then neckline-confirmation, turns the same geometry into a measured-move and one invalidation-stop. If an inverse head-and-shoulders aborts, that former neckline is the exit.
- A reversal stays a sketch until volume-fade at the late peak is followed by neckline-confirmation, preferably on expanding volume.
- The same formation supplies the measured-move and the invalidation-stop just beyond the right shoulder or second peak.
- An open-interest-filter that looks like covering, not new demand, weakens the case that a late high will hold.
- Under the aborted-bottom-rule, a failed inverse head-and-shoulders exits just under the former neckline rather than staying long.
A formation that names its own plan
Pattern geometry is presented as a way to add plan discipline by deriving both a price objective and a protective invalidation level from the formation itself.
Neckline-confirmation treats a top or bottom as live only after price breaks the line joining the intervening swing lows for a top, or the intervening swing highs for a bottom, preferably with expanding volume. The measured-move is the minimum objective taken by projecting the vertical distance from the extreme, the head or the twin peak, to the neckline or support, starting from the break point. The invalidation-stop is the price just beyond the right shoulder or second peak that cancels the pattern hypothesis if crossed.
Volume-fade is weaker activity into the right shoulder or second test of resistance, read as demand that cannot match the first attempt. An open-interest-filter reads a late rally on falling open interest as short covering, not fresh buying, and weakens the case that a new high will hold.
Textbook volume on tops
In a textbook head-and-shoulders top, volume is typically heaviest on the left shoulder, lighter through the head and right shoulder, and expands on a break under the neckline. The projected objective equals the vertical distance from the head to the neckline.
In a textbook double top, volume is strongest on the first drive into resistance, weaker on the second test, and the minimum objective after a support break equals the distance from the peaks to that support line.
Completed tops in the archive cases
On the June 1988 British pound chart, the advance into the head at point 3 occurred on volume well below the two earlier peaks and with declining open interest. The upward-sloping neckline then broke on May 17 as prices fell on heavy volume, which was treated as confirmation of the top. Invalidation was placed above the right shoulder at point 4, and a downside objective in the 179-180 area was measured from the head-to-neckline height. Later lows formed in the 166-168 area.
On August 1988 crude oil, three-day volume into the first peak totaled 238000 contracts versus 165000 into the second peak, about a 30 percent decline. A negative key reversal at the second high and a later break of 1765 were used to confirm a double top, even though that break day closed higher.
On the December 1988 Canadian dollar, the right-shoulder rally lasted seven days, about half the prior up-leg, while open interest fell and broke its uptrend. A high-volume gap through the neckline confirmed the head-and-shoulders top, with a measured target of 8010 and invalidation placed just above the right shoulder at 8290.
When the inverse head-and-shoulders aborts
July 1988 cocoa built a potential inverse head-and-shoulders with neckline resistance near 1630. The right-shoulder dip toward 1570 came on declining volume, then price crossed 1630 on very heavy volume before reversing back through that neckline two days after the illustrated chart ended, on volume heavier than the breakout.
After cocoa cleared 1630, the critical protective level was moved to just under that neckline, so the later plunge back through it would have exited the long once the bottom formation aborted. The aborted-bottom-rule is that if an inverse head-and-shoulders triggers and then fails back through the neckline, that former breakout line becomes the exit, not a reason to stay long.
All readings on this track · 37 readings
- 1982Head and shoulders as a three-path completion test
- 1984Stock low clusters as a cycle baseline
- 1985Four-phase construction of the head-and-shoulders reversal
- 1989Volume-confirmed reversal patterns, stops, and measured objectives
- 1991The journal as one checklist for taken and skipped trades
- 1991Head and shoulders as a direction hypothesis
- 1991Candlestick body and shadow construction with three-Buddha peaks
- 1992A three-count drill that binds candlesticks, head and shoulders, and entry rules
- 1997Constructing bump and run reversal channels
- 1998Testing reversal formations in bond futures
- 1999Construction first: extra shoulders, the neckline, and the diamond test
- 1999Dead-cat bounce, rollover, and failed reversals
- 1999Evaluating time gaps in bond reversal patterns
- 2000Constructing head and shoulders and double reversal patterns
- 2001Constructing broadening and complex bottoms
- 2001Constructing a slanted head-and-shoulders when the chart is tilted
- 2002Head and shoulders with dominant-cycle timing
- 2002Trendline breaks, right shoulders, and trailing stops
- 2003Confirmation tests for bearish top patterns
- 2003Commodity top hypotheses on a dollar rebound
- 2003A head-and-shoulders test during a bear rally
- 2004Pattern breakouts need a primary-trend filter
- 2004Reading candlestick closes on trendline and neckline tests
- 2004Candle diagnosis needs Western targets and stops
- 2004Head-and-shoulders neckline construction
- 2005A familiar chart condition is a hypothesis, not a completed decision
- 2005A 50-day ceiling and a rising-floor stalemate
- 2006A complete trading plan from philosophy to checklist
- 2006Thin-market head and shoulders with two averages and MACD confirmation
- 2010Head and shoulders as a playback-tested setup
- 2011Turning a head-and-shoulders outline into a breakout hypothesis
- 2011Volume-confirmed head and shoulders on AIG and Citigroup in 2007
- 2013Constructing head-and-shoulders milestone points
- 2013Head-and-shoulders geometry versus the filter stack
- 2013Algorithmic head-and-shoulders construction
- 2018International relative strength as a double-top case study
- 2019Structure invalidation before comfort-stops