Skip to main content
Track Head and shoulders
27 / 37
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

2005issue C061-2

A 50-day ceiling and a rising-floor stalemate

The daily S&P 500 was described as oscillating between a rising trendline and the 50-day moving average, so a long thesis was withheld. After both rails failed, the next support map came from an older congestion zone and a head-and-shoulders measured zone, not from the oil story.

  • While price sat between a rising-trendline floor and a 50-day moving-average ceiling, any long thesis waited on a break above the average.
  • After the floor broke and price stood below the average, that average became a directional-filter and new long exposure was taken off the table.
  • A modest decline in crude oil, even near the watched 52 area, did not produce the expected equity lift.
  • The next daily support near 1090-1100 was a prior congestion-zone that overlapped a head-and-shoulders measured-zone near 1100-1110.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackHead and shoulders64 readingsSupport and resistance170 readingsMoving average449 readings

A trapped range on the daily chart

The daily S&P 500 was described as oscillating between an upward-sloping trendline treated as support and a 50-day moving average treated as resistance. That rising-trendline had been tested three times. Support-resistance in this stretch was the pair of rails: the slope under successive daily lows, and the moving-average acting as a ceiling.

Any long thesis was deferred until a break above the 50-day average. Until that break, the location of price between the two rails was treated as a reason to wait rather than as a finished directional view.

Daily S&P 500 between a rising trendline and the 50-day average

From September 2004 into mid-April 2005 the cash S&P 500 bounced inside a narrowing band: an upward-sloping support line underneath and a flattening 50-day average overhead near 1194. Every test of that ceiling failed, which is why a long thesis was withheld while both rails still held. Weekly-ish closes were read from the daily candlesticks; the last print of 1187.76 and the 50-day reading of 1194.35 are the printed scale labels on that chart.
From September 2004 into mid-April 2005 the cash S&P 500 bounced inside a narrowing band: an upward-sloping support line underneath and a flattening 50-day average overhead near 1194. Every test of that ceiling failed, which is why a long thesis was withheld while both rails still held. Weekly-ish closes were read from the daily candlesticks; the last print of 1187.76 and the 50-day reading of 1194.35 are the printed scale labels on that chart.S&P 500 Index · Daily · 2004-09-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2005-04-11T00:00:00.000Z

Digitized from the daily eSignal raster. Swing points are approximate to a few index points; only the terminal cash close and 50-day value are taken from the printed labels. The rising rail is the straight support line drawn on the same chart, sampled along the segment that is actually visible.

Oil did not reset the map

A modest decline in crude oil did not produce the expected equity lift. Crude near 52 had been the level watched before looking for stocks to turn higher.

Editorial note: that oil story is not a substitute for the chart map once the two rails fail.

Both rails fail

Price later lost the rising support and stood below the 50-day average. The case then treated new long exposure as off the table and treated the e-mini as a short-side candidate.

At that point the moving-average worked as a directional-filter. Location versus the 50-day average gated whether new long exposure was even under consideration.

Session record after the break

Intraday records for 14 April and 15 April showed repeated downside bursts, steepest near each close. Disappointing IBM earnings were listed among the session influences. No fills were recorded on those days.

On 18 April a short was opened at 1148 and covered at 1145 after the session was judged unlikely to reverse.

Next support from congestion and a topping map

After the breakdown, the next daily support zone was placed near 1090-1100. That band matched a congestion-zone, a cluster of price bars from October 2004.

A possible head-and-shoulders top was mapped with a measured-zone near 1100-1110. The implied downside area overlapped the same 1090-1100 support band, so the topping map and the older congestion were checked against each other rather than treated as separate stories.

Editorial reading: once the waiting room failed, the checkable next-support map was that overlap, not a preferred oil narrative.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
27 of 37 in the Head and shoulders track
20061-5 pp.Next on Head and shouldersA complete trading plan from philosophy to checklistAn incomplete plan commonly omits the market inefficiency being exploited, the links among method, timeframe, and tools, and a low-risk path through the learning curve.
All readings on this track · 37 readings
  1. 1982Head and shoulders as a three-path completion test
  2. 1984Stock low clusters as a cycle baseline
  3. 1985Four-phase construction of the head-and-shoulders reversal
  4. 1989Volume-confirmed reversal patterns, stops, and measured objectives
  5. 1991The journal as one checklist for taken and skipped trades
  6. 1991Head and shoulders as a direction hypothesis
  7. 1991Candlestick body and shadow construction with three-Buddha peaks
  8. 1992A three-count drill that binds candlesticks, head and shoulders, and entry rules
  9. 1997Constructing bump and run reversal channels
  10. 1998Testing reversal formations in bond futures
  11. 1999Construction first: extra shoulders, the neckline, and the diamond test
  12. 1999Dead-cat bounce, rollover, and failed reversals
  13. 1999Evaluating time gaps in bond reversal patterns
  14. 2000Constructing head and shoulders and double reversal patterns
  15. 2001Constructing broadening and complex bottoms
  16. 2001Constructing a slanted head-and-shoulders when the chart is tilted
  17. 2002Head and shoulders with dominant-cycle timing
  18. 2002Trendline breaks, right shoulders, and trailing stops
  19. 2003Confirmation tests for bearish top patterns
  20. 2003Commodity top hypotheses on a dollar rebound
  21. 2003A head-and-shoulders test during a bear rally
  22. 2004Pattern breakouts need a primary-trend filter
  23. 2004Reading candlestick closes on trendline and neckline tests
  24. 2004Candle diagnosis needs Western targets and stops
  25. 2004Head-and-shoulders neckline construction
  26. 2005A familiar chart condition is a hypothesis, not a completed decision
  27. 2005A 50-day ceiling and a rising-floor stalemate
  28. 2006A complete trading plan from philosophy to checklist
  29. 2006Thin-market head and shoulders with two averages and MACD confirmation
  30. 2010Head and shoulders as a playback-tested setup
  31. 2011Turning a head-and-shoulders outline into a breakout hypothesis
  32. 2011Volume-confirmed head and shoulders on AIG and Citigroup in 2007
  33. 2013Constructing head-and-shoulders milestone points
  34. 2013Head-and-shoulders geometry versus the filter stack
  35. 2013Algorithmic head-and-shoulders construction
  36. 2018International relative strength as a double-top case study
  37. 2019Structure invalidation before comfort-stops
By fieldTrend and channels181 readingsBy year2005104 readings
All 64 readings tagged Head and shoulders
Also on Head and shoulders5 readings
2003Commodity top hypotheses on a dollar rebound2004A 50-day average touch as a screening procedure2006Thin-market head and shoulders with two averages and MACD confirmation1982Head and shoulders as a three-path completion test1984Stock low clusters as a cycle baseline