Skip to main content
Track Double top and bottom
31 / 32
Library

2018issue C118

Evaluating double bottoms with a locked stochastic confirmation

A 2018 sample of 3388 double bottoms was resorted after crude filters were stripped away. A separate confirmation rule then keeps an overbought-oversold stochastic-oscillator print from changing meaning on its own.

  • After crude filters were stripped away, pattern-height still sorted the historical double-bottom sample into short, middle, and tall groups.
  • Bottom-to-bottom price variation and volume did not discriminate in that sample, so the retained checks compared trough order and a short bottom-volume-window instead of a hard breakout-day-volume floor.
  • An overbought-oversold stochastic-oscillator print does not assign trade direction. The same daily oversold reading was described as a long-side setup and as a print that preceded a decline.
  • Independent-confirmation from a 200-day simple moving average plus support and resistance, read with daily and weekly bars, keeps one oscillator message from changing meaning in silence.
Entries in this reading2 entries

A two-layer falsification drill

A double-bottom is a two-trough price structure whose intervening peak and later breakout define a testable reversal hypothesis rather than a finished forecast. A stochastic-oscillator is a bounded reading of where the latest close sits inside a chosen lookback range, computed on daily or weekly bars. Overbought-oversold is an extreme oscillator print that marks location inside that lookback range and does not, by itself, assign trade direction.

Editorial interpretation: run those definitions as two stacked checks. First ask which geometric traits of a double-bottom still sort a historical sample after crude filters are stripped away. Then lock each stochastic-oscillator reading to an independent-confirmation rule so the same overbought-oversold print cannot silently change meaning.

What still sorted the sample

A 2018 reader evaluation assembled 3388 manually identified double bottoms from 1080 stocks covering 1991 through 2018. Pattern-height, the distance from the trough structure to the breakout price, remained the attribute used to order short, middle, and tall groups. That evaluation used the median height-to-breakout price as the cutoff between short and tall double bottoms.

Bottom-to-bottom price variation and volume were treated as non-discriminating attributes in that sample. The same three height bands, 0-10 percent, 10-20 percent, and more than 20 percent, were kept as the comparison frame once other screens were removed.

Filters that were stripped away

A 100000-share floor on breakout-day-volume was omitted because it cut the usable sample from more than 2000 cases to 164. Breakout-day-volume is share turnover on the session that clears the intervening peak. A hard share-count floor can shrink the usable sample sharply.

Screens that dropped stocks priced under 5 or over 500 were also omitted so those three height bands could be compared without those price limits.

Rules that were retained

Two retained rule checks were a left bottom priced above the right bottom, and right-bottom volume, averaged over the five sessions from two days before through two days after the trough, exceeding left-bottom volume. That comparison uses a bottom-volume-window: a short symmetric window around each trough, such as two sessions before through two sessions after, used to compare activity at the right bottom with activity at the left.

When one oscillator print means two things

A contemporaneous letter observed that an oversold daily stochastic-oscillator during an uptrend was described both as a potential long-side setup and, on one illustrated advance, as a reading that preceded a decline. The same letter cited a weekly stochastic-oscillator that was overbought at the start of April and already trending lower, after which no upside reversal appeared.

The author's reply treated identical oscillator or pattern signals as messages that can differ by context and described a signal as a possibility rather than a guaranteed outcome. The reply specified a 200-day simple moving average plus support and resistance as extra confirmation and stated that weekly and daily stochastics should be read together with those tools. Independent-confirmation is a second, separately defined condition such as a long moving-average location or a support and resistance test that can ratify or reject the first signal.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
31 of 32 in the Double top and bottom track
201910-17 pp.Next on Double top and bottomForex pairs as relative value: yield spreads, support, and a double bottomRead the yield-spread or equity regime first, then wait for a familiar pair-level condition such as a support retest or a Double top and bottom sequence.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
  1. 1988Reaction length as a trend integrity test
  2. 1991Sold-out double bottoms as a three-gate inventory test
  3. 1991A breadth classifier for V-bottoms and W-bottoms
  4. 1991Precomputed price-ratio clusters and double-top tests
  5. 1992Bond turning points as a regime check on equity double tops and breakouts
  6. 1992Commodity-bond ratio as an equity regime overlay
  7. 1992Gold lead confirmation for commodity-index turns
  8. 1994Constructing the thousand-line advance-decline indicator
  9. 1995Evaluating zero-line patterns on a breadth-price oscillator
  10. 1996Constructing double tops from a resistance retest to a trough break
  11. 1996Four-stage double-bottom construction
  12. 1998Double-bottom confirmation and stop placement
  13. 2000Two-bar reversal construction
  14. 2001Constructing double tops from failed resistance retests
  15. 2002Eve-Eve double bottoms: width, confirmation, and overhead resistance
  16. 2002Constructing Eve-and-Eve and classic double bottoms
  17. 2003Eve-Adam double bottoms as a two-step classroom test
  18. 2003Shape contrast then breakout confirmation in Adam and Eve double bottoms
  19. 2003Reading cyclical bottoms inside secular bear regimes
  20. 2004A case study of the shark-attack Fibonacci retracement
  21. 2004Confirming index turns with envelopes, divergence, and breadth
  22. 2005A five-wave euro/dollar case and the support that still had to fail
  23. 2007Constructing commodity seasonal indexes for regime context
  24. 2009Constructing rounded and double-top short setups
  25. 2010Hourly pattern entries, exits, and abstention as one playbook
  26. 2016Ugly double bottom after a yearly low
  27. 2016An unconfirmed stock double bottom next to a confirmed index
  28. 2016Constructing a range-midpoint moving average
  29. 2017Evaluating whole-dollar delays on pattern breakouts
  30. 2018Volume-confirmed bottoms and breakouts with moving averages
  31. 2018Evaluating double bottoms with a locked stochastic confirmation
  32. 2019Forex pairs as relative value: yield spreads, support, and a double bottom
All 68 readings tagged Double top and bottom
Also on Double top and bottom5 readings