Skip to main content
Track Double top and bottom
10 / 32
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

1996issue C081-2

Constructing double tops from a resistance retest to a trough break

A first resistance peak, a corrective pullback, a thinner second test, and a break of the intervening low are the pieces that turn two similar highs into a completed double-top construction.

  • In an uptrend, a first peak forms when remaining demand is absorbed and sellers overwhelm buyers, marking major resistance where supply exceeds demand.
  • Failure to extend the uptrend attracts further profit-taking and a corrective phase; if the bullish backdrop has not yet reversed, price can rally back toward the same resistance.
  • The second visit usually shows weaker retest volume because fewer buyers remain, and selling typically regains control once late buyers are filled.
  • The double top is treated as complete only after price declines through the intervening low between the two peaks.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackDouble top and bottom68 readingsVolume-price analysis129 readingsSupport and resistance170 readings

The first peak marks major resistance

In an uptrend, a first peak forms when remaining demand is absorbed and sellers overwhelm buyers. That high marks major resistance: a prior high where supply first overwhelmed demand and later attracted a second selling wave.

Trading activity at that first resistance peak frequently increases sharply. Failure to extend the uptrend then attracts further profit-taking and a corrective pullback.

The corrective phase and the return

The corrective phase is the pullback after an unsustainable first peak while the broader uptrend has not yet reversed. If the bullish backdrop has not yet reversed, price can rally back toward the same resistance after the correction.

Participants who saw the first high often intend to sell if that price is offered again. The return therefore tests whether that earlier supply is still waiting at the same level.

Weaker volume on the second test

On the second visit to resistance, sellers meet late buyers. Once those buyers are filled, selling typically regains control.

The second resistance test usually occurs on weaker retest volume than the first because fewer buyers remain. That thinner activity is part of the construction, not a separate pattern.

Completion at the intervening low

A double top is a two-peak reversal construction treated as complete only after price breaks the intervening low. The intervening low is the trough between the two peaks.

The construction is treated as complete only after price declines through that low. Until that break, the two highs remain an unfinished condition rather than a finished reversal hypothesis.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
10 of 32 in the Double top and bottom track
19961-1 pp.Next on Double top and bottomFour-stage double-bottom constructionIn this editorial reading, a double bottom is a four-checkpoint construction test, not a pair of similar troughs.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
  1. 1988Reaction length as a trend integrity test
  2. 1991Sold-out double bottoms as a three-gate inventory test
  3. 1991A breadth classifier for V-bottoms and W-bottoms
  4. 1991Precomputed price-ratio clusters and double-top tests
  5. 1992Bond turning points as a regime check on equity double tops and breakouts
  6. 1992Commodity-bond ratio as an equity regime overlay
  7. 1992Gold lead confirmation for commodity-index turns
  8. 1994Constructing the thousand-line advance-decline indicator
  9. 1995Evaluating zero-line patterns on a breadth-price oscillator
  10. 1996Constructing double tops from a resistance retest to a trough break
  11. 1996Four-stage double-bottom construction
  12. 1998Double-bottom confirmation and stop placement
  13. 2000Two-bar reversal construction
  14. 2001Constructing double tops from failed resistance retests
  15. 2002Eve-Eve double bottoms: width, confirmation, and overhead resistance
  16. 2002Constructing Eve-and-Eve and classic double bottoms
  17. 2003Eve-Adam double bottoms as a two-step classroom test
  18. 2003Shape contrast then breakout confirmation in Adam and Eve double bottoms
  19. 2003Reading cyclical bottoms inside secular bear regimes
  20. 2004A case study of the shark-attack Fibonacci retracement
  21. 2004Confirming index turns with envelopes, divergence, and breadth
  22. 2005A five-wave euro/dollar case and the support that still had to fail
  23. 2007Constructing commodity seasonal indexes for regime context
  24. 2009Constructing rounded and double-top short setups
  25. 2010Hourly pattern entries, exits, and abstention as one playbook
  26. 2016Ugly double bottom after a yearly low
  27. 2016An unconfirmed stock double bottom next to a confirmed index
  28. 2016Constructing a range-midpoint moving average
  29. 2017Evaluating whole-dollar delays on pattern breakouts
  30. 2018Volume-confirmed bottoms and breakouts with moving averages
  31. 2018Evaluating double bottoms with a locked stochastic confirmation
  32. 2019Forex pairs as relative value: yield spreads, support, and a double bottom
By fieldChart patterns222 readingsBy year199680 readings
All 68 readings tagged Double top and bottom
Also on Double top and bottom5 readings
2001Constructing double tops from failed resistance retests1989Volume-confirmed reversal patterns, stops, and measured objectives1991Sold-out double bottoms as a three-gate inventory test2005Volume shapes versus triangle and double-pattern breakouts1991Precomputed price-ratio clusters and double-top tests