1991issue C041-4
Precomputed price-ratio clusters and double-top tests
A pre-trade price map computes cycle retracements, same-degree swing multiples, and percent-change ratios independently, then keeps only the narrow overlaps as support or resistance hypotheses. A double top or swing termination is the pattern check on whether that cluster is being tested.
- Compute cycle-ratio divisions, same-degree swing multiples, and percent-change comparisons independently before the next test so candidate support and resistance zones are known in advance.
- Treat a price-objective cluster, a narrow overlap of two or more independent calculations, as a higher-priority support or resistance hypothesis than any single method.
- Use a double-top test of two nearby swing highs as pattern confirmation that a clustered resistance band is being probed.
- Recalculate price relationships when a high or low is suspected, and read coincidental zones together with time and pattern rather than on price alone.
Time, price, and pattern
Analysis is framed as three market dimensions: time, price, and pattern. The price relationships are computed ahead of the next test so candidate support and resistance zones are known in advance.
Three precomputable price methods
Three precomputable price methods are specified. A cycleRatioDivision is a price level found by splitting a completed swing or cycle by a fixed ratio set before the next move arrives. That family includes Fibonacci retracements. Swing-to-swing dynamic ratios include a swingMultiple, a ratio that relates the length of the current swing to one or more earlier swings of similar degree. A percentChangeComparison checks one swing's percentage move against the next swing's percentage move, including cases where the second percent is a Fibonacci fraction of the first.
Any one method may mark temporary support or resistance. A coincidence among methods is treated as a more important objective. That overlap is a priceObjectiveCluster: a narrow band where two or more independently calculated price relationships land together and are treated as a higher-priority support or resistance test.
The watched retracement set
The Fibonacci cycle-ratio set given for retracements is 0.382, 0.5, and 0.618. That dynamicRatioSet is applied to cycle length, swing length, or percent change. A ratioRetracement is the size of a countertrend swing expressed as a fraction of the preceding trend swing. These divisions are to be watched on hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly charts even though markets are not said to respect every division every time.
A weekly bond cluster at the April low
In the weekly bond example, a 21% advance from the 16 August 1988 low at 83.23 to a calculated 101.07, printed high 101.09 on 1 August 1989, was followed by a 13% decline targeting 88.04, with 13 stated as 61.8% of 21. The April 1990 low printed at 88.07.
The 27 April 1990 low is presented as a priceObjectiveCluster of a 50% retracement of the October 1987 to August 1989 advance, a 62% swing-ratio of consecutive declining swings, and the 13-to-21 percentage-change relationship.
A double-top test of clustered resistance
The 15 June and 1 August 1990 highs are identified as a double top sitting on a 2.5 swing-ratio of the prior advance and a 62% retracement of the 20 December 1989 to 27 April 1990 decline, with the later high within two ticks of that 62% level. A doubleTopTest uses those two nearby swing highs as pattern confirmation that a clustered resistance band is being probed.
Bear-swing multiples at the September low
The 24 September 1990 low is described as coinciding with three prior bear-swing ratios, including a 1.5 multiple of the 22 March to 27 April 1990 decline and a 1.0 multiple of the 20 December 1989 to 13 March 1990 decline.
Recalculate, then wait for time and pattern
Price relationships are to be recalculated whenever a high or low is suspected, but a decision is not to rest on price alone. Coincidental price zones are to be read together with time and pattern.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
- 1988Reaction length as a trend integrity test
- 1991Sold-out double bottoms as a three-gate inventory test
- 1991A breadth classifier for V-bottoms and W-bottoms
- 1991Precomputed price-ratio clusters and double-top tests
- 1992Bond turning points as a regime check on equity double tops and breakouts
- 1992Commodity-bond ratio as an equity regime overlay
- 1992Gold lead confirmation for commodity-index turns
- 1994Constructing the thousand-line advance-decline indicator
- 1995Evaluating zero-line patterns on a breadth-price oscillator
- 1996Constructing double tops from a resistance retest to a trough break
- 1996Four-stage double-bottom construction
- 1998Double-bottom confirmation and stop placement
- 2000Two-bar reversal construction
- 2001Constructing double tops from failed resistance retests
- 2002Eve-Eve double bottoms: width, confirmation, and overhead resistance
- 2002Constructing Eve-and-Eve and classic double bottoms
- 2003Eve-Adam double bottoms as a two-step classroom test
- 2003Shape contrast then breakout confirmation in Adam and Eve double bottoms
- 2003Reading cyclical bottoms inside secular bear regimes
- 2004A case study of the shark-attack Fibonacci retracement
- 2004Confirming index turns with envelopes, divergence, and breadth
- 2005A five-wave euro/dollar case and the support that still had to fail
- 2007Constructing commodity seasonal indexes for regime context
- 2009Constructing rounded and double-top short setups
- 2010Hourly pattern entries, exits, and abstention as one playbook
- 2016Ugly double bottom after a yearly low
- 2016An unconfirmed stock double bottom next to a confirmed index
- 2016Constructing a range-midpoint moving average
- 2017Evaluating whole-dollar delays on pattern breakouts
- 2018Volume-confirmed bottoms and breakouts with moving averages
- 2018Evaluating double bottoms with a locked stochastic confirmation
- 2019Forex pairs as relative value: yield spreads, support, and a double bottom