Skip to main content
Track Pivot point
14 / 38
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

2006issue C061-3

Constructing a pivot grid for stops and buy-stops

The five-level pivot-point grid is built from the prior high, low, and close so the same fulcrum that names support-resistance also names a stop-loss rail and a buy-stop. Editorial: those rails are usable only when their width matches the risk budget already intended.

  • The objective construction averages high, low, and close into a pivot-point, then names first and second support-resistance rails from that pivot plus the session high and low.
  • The central pivot sits midway between second-support and second-resistance and is treated as a fulcrum; a cross of that level is read as a directional test.
  • A protective stop-loss is parked one price unit under second-support, and a buy-stop is parked one price unit above second-resistance, so contact with a rail is not treated as the event.
  • Editorial: the finished grid is a construction test only if the outer rails also fit the risk budget already intended, because second-support can sit much tighter than a conventional stop.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackPivot point45 readingsStop-loss order144 readingsSupport and resistance170 readings

The construction test

The historical workflow builds a five-level support-resistance grid from a calculated pivot-point. Editorial: treat that grid as a construction test. The same arithmetic that names the fulcrum must also produce a stop-loss rail and a breakout buy-stop, and those rails are usable only if their width matches the risk budget already intended.

A cross of the central pivot is used as a directional test. Trade above it is read as bullish structure, and trade below it is read as bearish structure.

How the five levels are named

The objective construction averages high, low, and close to form the pivot-point. First support is twice that pivot minus the high. Second-support is the pivot minus the high plus the low. First resistance is twice the pivot minus the low. Second-resistance is the pivot plus the high minus the low.

On this grid the central pivot sits midway between second-support and second-resistance, which is why it is treated as a fulcrum.

The open is not an input to the five-level construction, so instruments that publish only a closing print cannot populate the grid.

AAPL five-level pivot grid, 6 January 2006

Apple’s prior-session high, low and close produce a 75.9 fulcrum, with outer support at 73.7 and outer resistance at 78.0. Those are the same rails the article parks a stop-loss and a buy-stop on. Figures are the one-decimal PP, S1, S2, R1 and R2 printed on the author’s PortAnal watchlist for 6 January 2006.
Apple’s prior-session high, low and close produce a 75.9 fulcrum, with outer support at 73.7 and outer resistance at 78.0. Those are the same rails the article parks a stop-loss and a buy-stop on. Figures are the one-decimal PP, S1, S2, R1 and R2 printed on the author’s PortAnal watchlist for 6 January 2006.AAPL · Daily session grid from prior high, low and close · 2006-01-06T00:00:00.000Z to 2006-01-06T00:00:00.000Z

Standard five-level construction: PP=(H+L+C)/3, S1=2×PP−H, S2=PP−H+L, R1=2×PP−L, R2=PP+H−L. The open is not in the equation. The sheet’s displayed one-decimal values are used as printed; the author then offsets the outer rails by one dollar when placing the stop and the buy-stop.

Stops parked on the outer rails

An opening print above the pivot is framed as a continuation cue for a market long, with a protective stop-loss one price unit under second-support so contact with that rail is not automatically an exit.

A buy-stop one price unit above second-resistance is constructed so entry waits for a break of that ceiling. The extra unit is meant to reduce fills that reverse at the line. That unit offset is not treated as fixed across all price levels.

Variants and a different kind of pivot

Variant constructions include averaging high, low, close, and open; replacing the prior close with the current open; and adding third support and resistance. A wide high-low session can stretch the outer band 20-30 percent from the pivot.

The same swing-extremum idea appears under several labels: high and low pivots, isolated highs and lows, and high points and low points. Those labels are distinct from the formula grid.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
14 of 38 in the Pivot point track
20061-9 pp.Next on Pivot pointMonoparametric automatic trendline constructionA directional price move can exist without a constructible trendline if no qualifying downward or upward corrections form usable pivots.
All readings on this track · 38 readings
  1. 1988Constructing action-reaction lines from two pivots
  2. 1988Constructing intradaily point-and-figure boxes and pivot ladders
  3. 1991Constructing layered support and resistance from swings, pivots, and retracements
  4. 1994Three locks on a day-session order, then a staged exit
  5. 1994Building a five-level daily pivot grid
  6. 1996Constructing daily pivot points from session prices
  7. 1996Higher time frame balance points as a trend and band filter
  8. 1998Cup-with-handle construction rules
  9. 2000Pivot levels as a daily trade hypothesis
  10. 2001Construct a same-session polarity card around the daily pivot
  11. 2001Trading inside the cup-with-handle before the breakout
  12. 2005A lower-low rebound as one entry, abstention, and stop routine
  13. 2006Constructing session pivot maps from the prior high, low, and close
  14. 2006Constructing a pivot grid for stops and buy-stops
  15. 2006Monoparametric automatic trendline construction
  16. 2008Write the exit before the entry
  17. 2010Dynamic-pivot range grids for trend bias
  18. 2010Reverse-entry exits for pairs, pivots and support
  19. 2011Sequencing pairs, futures pivots, and implied volatility
  20. 2013Constructing Camarilla levels from prior range
  21. 2013Camarilla levels as a multi-timeframe map of reversion and breakout
  22. 2013Constructing a camarilla-grid from a completed lookback range
  23. 2013Constructing daily pivot support and resistance rungs
  24. 2014Constructing daily pivot levels from prior-session OHLC
  25. 2014Next-session pivot support and resistance from daily bars
  26. 2014Constructing session pivot rails from the prior-day range
  27. 2014Evaluating moving-average, pivot, and support-resistance filters
  28. 2016Stage a Trailing stop toward a planned target
  29. 2016Smoothed RSI and full-cut pivots for option-income exits
  30. 2017Constructing a weekly seasonality pivot scaffold
  31. 2017Seasonality and pivot points as scenario maps, not forecasts
  32. 2018Wave pivots, strength filters, and option premium
  33. 2018Constructing Fibonacci and daily pivot support maps
  34. 2018Building a daily pivot lattice with Fibonacci rails
  35. 2019Prior-session pivot channels for same-day entries
  36. 2019Constructing intraday pivot channels from prior-session levels
  37. 2020Variable-strength pivot highs as falsifiable entry filters
  38. 2020A high-volume-pivot long after a multi-week decline
By fieldTrend and channels181 readingsBy year200683 readings
All 45 readings tagged Pivot point
Also on Pivot point5 readings
2000Pivot levels as a daily trade hypothesis2005A lower-low rebound as one entry, abstention, and stop routine2020A high-volume-pivot long after a multi-week decline1988Constructing intradaily point-and-figure boxes and pivot ladders1991Constructing layered support and resistance from swings, pivots, and retracements