2010issue C0746-49
A weekly contest long treated as one swing procedure
A March 2010 contest long shows a weekly swing written in advance: a gap-fill-entry, a stop under a defined swing low, a target at a prior high, and an exit judged against the value-zone and the price-channel rather than against the headline percentage.
- The contest made a weekly pick testable by requiring entry, target, and stop before the week began, then revealing those levels after the weekend.
- After the Monday gap, the planned pullback was replaced by a gap-fill-entry that raised the buy to the prior day's high and filled on the later slide.
- The commentator scored the long by proximity of the entry to the value-zone and of the exit to the upper price-channel line, then by the share of channel height captured.
- The one-week limit cut the trade before the full crossover and value-zone exit, and the write-up left open whether the same process could flip from buying to shorting if the broader trend turned down.
Write the levels before the week begins
The weekly contest required each member to submit a pick with an entry, a target, and a stop before the week began, then reveal those levels after the weekend.
The reviewed case is the winning long from the week ended March 19, 2010, in an interest-rate-sensitive real-estate name whose daily chart had been pressing higher while shorts crowded the support area.
The planned pullback became a gap-fill-entry
A planned pullback entry at 27.57 was abandoned after a Monday opening gap to 28.00. The buy was raised to the prior day's high, the gap filled, price slid to 27.38, then rebounded, and the fill shown on the management chart is 27.72.
Editorial note: that adjustment is the gap-fill-entry. The buy is raised to the prior day's high after an opening gap, then filled on the subsequent pullback rather than chased at the open.
The stop, the target, and the earlier exit
After the fill, the stop sat under the March low at 26.92 and the target sat just under the February high at 29.75.
A 4.9 percent surge on Wednesday, March 17, broke resistance as covering accelerated. The trader then exited at 29.32 on early signs of weakness instead of waiting for the full exit rule of a crossover plus a close in the value-zone, for a 5.77 percent gain.
Value-zone and price-channel as the grade
The commentator graded the long as a high-quality swing because the entry sat near the exponential-moving-average value-zone and the exit sat near the upper channel line that marked the overvalued band.
Editorial note: the moving-average here is a pair of exponential averages that mark a mid-range value-zone used to judge whether an entry is near fair value. The price-channel is a daily envelope whose height and upper line mark an overvalued band used to grade how much of a swing was captured.
The daily channel at entry was described as about $4 tall. The $1.60 captured move was scored as 40 percent of that height, above the 30 percent threshold used to mark an A trade.
One week is not the only horizon
The contest limited holding to one week, while the write-up noted that the same setup often looked stronger on a three-week horizon and that a later chart still showed unused upside after the early exit.
The first quarter of 2010 favored longs, and the open question left for the trader was whether the same process could reverse from buying to shorting if the broader trend turned down.
All readings on this track · 35 readings
- 2001Swing trading with trailing stops and fixed loss exits
- 2003Linear regression swing alerts and trailing stops
- 2005Range-width gates for swing entries at base edges
- 2006Beyond setups: a six-factor trading process
- 2007Angle of ascent, chart scale, and style-fit
- 2010Stacking a short-horizon oscillator with a moving average and swing hold rules
- 2010A weekly contest long treated as one swing procedure
- 2011Four-color volume-price states for long-only swing actions
- 2012Classify momentum, velocity, or volatility before the swing signal
- 2013Swing rules as a portable entry and exit procedure
- 2013Constructing paired percent-b and stochastic swing oscillators
- 2013Give the fast band line and the slow stochastic complementary jobs
- 2013Smoothed percent-b divergences for numbered swing-wave rules
- 2013Portable swing rules for candle turns and a 1-2-3 wave count
- 2013A three-average swing and breakout case study
- 2013Constructing swing trades with a fifty-day average and a five-bar exponential average
- 2014From aliasing and dilation to a roofed stochastic swing
- 2014Channel width and trend-filter lookback as separate swing-trading choices
- 2016Constructing volume-confirmed multiday breakout swings
- 2017Constructing swing signals from a volume-weighted average cross
- 2017Golden-cross swing entry with a trailing-stop exit
- 2017One swing procedure: group leadership first, then a volume-price leave
- 2017Four-day green-candle breakout entry as one swing procedure
- 2017Swing pivots need a 100-period crossover and a breakout candle
- 2017Supply and demand zones as bounded swing maps
- 2018Three-bar volume-confirmed swing breakout
- 2018Tight stops first on swing breakouts with a range filter
- 2018Constructing trend and swing rules from horizon to crossover
- 2019Decade-level breakouts as one closed swing procedure
- 2019Inverse-pair swing trading with a shared buy-stop
- 2019Week-range next-day breakout on bitcoin pairs
- 2019Ranking strength before confirming a multi-timeframe breakout
- 2019Forty-five-degree multi-week swing breakout as a closed procedure
- 2020A dual pending-stop pair as one bitcoin swing construction
- 2020High-low activator, directional oscillator, and momentum swing agreement