2013issue C118-9
Portable swing rules for candle turns and a 1-2-3 wave count
Swing-style rules can travel across markets, time frames and non-time bars after settings are adapted. A 1-2-3 wave count stays one input to a larger indicator-rule swing system, not a complete signal on its own.
- Swing-style rules are described as usable on any market that produces regular, sufficiently large moves.
- The same swing procedure can be applied to instruments and to non-time bars such as range or renko constructions after the settings are adapted.
- The 1-2-3 wave count is one component of a larger indicator-rule swing system and is not meant to be used alone.
- Every time frame still needs two definitions: how turning points are identified, and how a noisy trend is distinguished from a peak or valley.
One portable swing procedure
Swing trading, as used here, is a holding-period procedure that looks for regular, large-enough price moves and encodes entry, exit and abstention as one testable rule set. Swing-style rules are described as usable on any market that produces regular, sufficiently large moves.
The published indicator rules were encoded in a trading-platform scripting language and also released as plain text. The same swing procedure can be applied to instruments and to non-time bars such as range or renko constructions after the settings are adapted. A 1-2-3 wave count can be applied below the daily bar, including intraday work, if its settings are adapted to the instrument and the chosen time frame.
Wave count as a component, not a standalone signal
The 1-2-3 wave count is a three-swing labeling of successive turns used as one input to a larger swing-rule set, not as a complete standalone signal. It is presented as one component of a larger indicator-rule swing system and is not meant to be used alone. Using wave counts without the rest of the rule set is described as requiring a backtest of the chosen settings first.
Elliott wave analysis is a multi-swing labeling scheme. One implementation note treats Elliott-wave labeling as too subjective and too logic-heavy to encode, and looks instead to simpler peak-valley identification.
Candle turns, peak-valley marks and a size filter
Candlestick patterns, as used here, are repeatable open-high-low-close conditions, including step-candle logic at peaks and valleys, written so a chart turn can be encoded in a spreadsheet or platform. Step candlestick logic at peaks and valleys can be rewritten as spreadsheet procedures and combined with a minimum percent swing to mark a trend between apexes on daily or intraday bars.
Two definitions are treated as necessary on every time frame: how turning points are identified, and how a noisy trend is distinguished from a peak or valley. Peak-valley means a turning point defined on any time frame so later rules can tell a completed swing from noise inside a trend. A minimum percent swing is the size filter that ignores smaller oscillations when marking apexes and the trend between them.
What to encode and what to retune
The archive facts describe a historical workflow: write the swing filters, the candle turns and the 1-2-3 wave count as one rule set, then adapt settings when the instrument, the time frame or the bar type changes. Non-time bars can still host that same swing procedure after those settings are adapted.
Editorial: do not swap the peak-valley test or the minimum percent swing for a looser Elliott-wave label when the goal is a portable, encodeable procedure. Keep the three parts together and change only the settings that the instrument, the time frame and the bar construction actually require.
All readings on this track · 35 readings
- 2001Swing trading with trailing stops and fixed loss exits
- 2003Linear regression swing alerts and trailing stops
- 2005Range-width gates for swing entries at base edges
- 2006Beyond setups: a six-factor trading process
- 2007Angle of ascent, chart scale, and style-fit
- 2010Stacking a short-horizon oscillator with a moving average and swing hold rules
- 2010A weekly contest long treated as one swing procedure
- 2011Four-color volume-price states for long-only swing actions
- 2012Classify momentum, velocity, or volatility before the swing signal
- 2013Swing rules as a portable entry and exit procedure
- 2013Constructing paired percent-b and stochastic swing oscillators
- 2013Give the fast band line and the slow stochastic complementary jobs
- 2013Smoothed percent-b divergences for numbered swing-wave rules
- 2013Portable swing rules for candle turns and a 1-2-3 wave count
- 2013A three-average swing and breakout case study
- 2013Constructing swing trades with a fifty-day average and a five-bar exponential average
- 2014From aliasing and dilation to a roofed stochastic swing
- 2014Channel width and trend-filter lookback as separate swing-trading choices
- 2016Constructing volume-confirmed multiday breakout swings
- 2017Constructing swing signals from a volume-weighted average cross
- 2017Golden-cross swing entry with a trailing-stop exit
- 2017One swing procedure: group leadership first, then a volume-price leave
- 2017Four-day green-candle breakout entry as one swing procedure
- 2017Swing pivots need a 100-period crossover and a breakout candle
- 2017Supply and demand zones as bounded swing maps
- 2018Three-bar volume-confirmed swing breakout
- 2018Tight stops first on swing breakouts with a range filter
- 2018Constructing trend and swing rules from horizon to crossover
- 2019Decade-level breakouts as one closed swing procedure
- 2019Inverse-pair swing trading with a shared buy-stop
- 2019Week-range next-day breakout on bitcoin pairs
- 2019Ranking strength before confirming a multi-timeframe breakout
- 2019Forty-five-degree multi-week swing breakout as a closed procedure
- 2020A dual pending-stop pair as one bitcoin swing construction
- 2020High-low activator, directional oscillator, and momentum swing agreement