1995issue C101-5
Chart patterns as tactics, not strategy
A 1995 reader placed double tops, bottoms, and converging triangles with short-horizon entry or exit tactics, and treated a band envelope as mathematical price treatment that does not identify commercial demand.
- Scanning charts for a double top and bottom in order to infer later price direction was placed with short-horizon betting and with entry-or-exit tactics, not with strategy.
- The same tactical, not strategic, judgment was applied to a triangle pattern used to deduce future price direction.
- A Bollinger Bands envelope, together with other mathematical transforms of price, was used as an example of treatment that is unnecessary for interpreting commercial demand information.
- Planted area, yield, usage, substitution among competing products, and seasonal equilibrium were to be understood before any mathematical treatment of those factors.
A chart condition is not a market thesis
A 1995 reader argued that applying mathematical techniques to price history does not, by itself, identify the commercial forces that could determine later price direction. The argument drew a line between treating a price history and specifying the commercial forces that could determine later direction.
Double tops, bottoms, and triangles
The same reader argued that scanning charts for double tops and bottoms in order to infer later price direction belongs with short-horizon betting and with entry-or-exit tactics, not with strategy. In the terms used here, a double top and bottom is a repeated high or low in the price structure treated as a chart condition that can frame a trade hypothesis, not as proof of later direction.
The critique applied the same tactical, not strategic, judgment to converging triangles used to deduce future price direction. A triangle pattern is a converging price-structure condition used here as an example of a short-horizon entry or exit cue rather than a substitute for a market thesis.
Bands as mathematical treatment
That critique used a Bollinger-style band, together with other mathematical transforms of price, as an example of treatment that is unnecessary for interpreting commercial demand information. Bollinger Bands, in this dossier, are a quantitative envelope around price used as an example of mathematical price treatment, not as a validated forecast.
Strategy before tactics
The reader held that planted area, yield, usage, substitution among competing products, and seasonal equilibrium should be understood before any mathematical treatment of those factors. Supply and demand, in that argument, are the commercial factors that should be specified before any mathematical treatment of price.
Tactics are rules for entering or leaving a market after a thesis already exists. Strategy is a view of why price should move, grounded in supply, demand, substitution, and seasonal balance rather than in a chart shape alone.
The publication's reply
The publication replied that regular reporting of fundamental supply-and-demand factors lay outside its technical-analysis scope, while noting that many traders combine both approaches.
All readings on this track · 33 readings
- 1986Gold as a double zigzag before a contracting B-wave triangle
- 1990Scoring competing wave counts after a crash
- 1992Pre-trade checklist for trendline and triangle signals
- 1995Chart patterns as tactics, not strategy
- 1996Constructing Elliott wave counts with triangles and Fibonacci
- 1996A price-channel case study with a pending triangle signal and a planned stop-loss
- 1996Expanding triangle as a dual-label fourth-wave reversal worksheet
- 1997Rising wedge construction, breakout, and volume
- 1997Confirm structure and conditions before naming a Triangle pattern
- 1999Drawing the Triangle pattern before Breakout confirmation and the Stop-loss order
- 2000Four-phase market cycle triangle breakouts
- 2000Continuation triangles as a three-lock experiment
- 2001Folding rule: stacking three trendlines on an accelerating swing
- 2003A scored symmetrical triangle on a utility stock
- 2003Constructing wedges versus flat-boundary triangles
- 2004Testing triangle breakouts against volume filters
- 2004Mute triangles, histogram force, and trader optimization
- 2004Constructing falsifiable reversal and continuation patterns
- 2004Construct a corrective rising wedge before treating it as a short
- 2004A continuation triangle with Fibonacci targets and an apex stop
- 2005Pre-breakout filters for classic chart patterns
- 2005Reverse trendlines as a geometry lab for convergence and expanding triangles
- 2005Volume shapes versus triangle and double-pattern breakouts
- 2005A nested-pattern checklist on the 2005 euro
- 2005Volume test for a descending triangle breakout
- 2010Constructing triangle, broadening, and head and shoulders patterns
- 2011Treat a numeric pattern rank as a shortlist
- 2011Evaluating the head-and-shoulders as a falsifiable reversal
- 2013Auditing chart patterns by the first post-breakout swing
- 2014A three-gate entry for a triangle pullback
- 2014Golden triangle: a 50-day pause that still needs both gates
- 2014The triangle qualifier came after the rating pre-screen and the fifty-day bounce
- 2018Aligning daily, weekly, and monthly triangles with trendlines and Fibonacci retracements