1996issue C011-2
Constructing Elliott wave counts with triangles and Fibonacci
Build an Elliott wave count as a five-three skeleton of impulse and corrective labels that can later be disproved. Editorial reading: use triangle placement and Fibonacci length tests as rejection tools that can invalidate those labels before any forecast is allowed.
- Classify a with-trend move as five waves and the following countertrend as three waves before claiming a completed cycle of the next higher degree.
- Expand or contract the count by degree: impulse waves subdivide into five smaller waves and corrective waves subdivide into three.
- Reject a triangle that does not sit in wave 4, wave b, or an X-wave slot, and reject a diagonal triangle that is not wave 5 or wave c.
- Anchor Fibonacci checks on completed legs and discard labels when later waves fail 0.618-family length tests.
Labels that can later be disproved
Elliott wave analysis is a labeling system that sorts price movement into impulse and corrective structures of nested degree so a chart count can be stated and later disproved. An impulse wave is a with-trend leg, conventionally numbered 1, 3, or 5, that itself subdivides into five smaller waves. A corrective wave is a countertrend unit, conventionally numbered 2, 4, a, b, or c, that typically subdivides into three smaller waves and may take several internal shapes.
The historical workflow below stays inside that construction grammar. TradersWeek editorial reading of the workflow is labelled as such and is not part of the construction rules themselves.
The five-three skeleton
A with-trend move is classified as five waves. After that impulse, a three-wave countertrend completes one full cycle of the next higher degree. Waves 1, 3, and 5 are impulse structures. Waves 2 and 4 are corrective structures that move against the preceding impulse.
Impulse waves of one degree subdivide into five smaller waves, and corrective waves of that degree subdivide into three. The same count can therefore be expanded or contracted by degree.
Impulse legs, extensions, and alternation
An extension is an impulse that stretches well beyond the length of its sibling impulses. That elongated form may appear in wave 1, 3, or 5. When waves 1 and 3 are similar in length, wave 5 is the more likely candidate to extend.
Waves 2 and 4 are expected to differ in complexity. The rule of alternation is that construction habit: those two corrections should not repeat the same internal shape. Wave 4 often returns near the price area of the fourth wave of one smaller degree.
The four corrective families
Corrective construction is grouped into four families: zigzag, flat, triangle, and a double or triple three joined by an X wave. A zigzag is built as five-three-five internal waves. A flat is built as three-three-five.
Where a triangle may sit
A triangle is a five-leg sideways construction, each leg itself a three-wave unit of smaller degree. It appears only in wave 4, wave b, or an X-wave slot. It takes one of four shapes: ascending, descending, contracting, or expanding. Those shapes are distinguished by how the boundary lines tilt.
Editorial test: a five-leg sideways pattern sitting anywhere else is a reason to reject the current labels, not a reason to widen the slot list.
The diagonal triangle
A diagonal triangle is a five-wave ending form whose internals are all threes and whose two boundary lines slope and converge. It occurs only as wave 5 or wave c. It is reserved for those ending slots.
Ratio checks on completed legs
Fibonacci retracement, in this workflow, is a ratio check anchored on completed legs. It asks whether later waves land near 0.618-family proportions rather than assuming any length is acceptable.
After the early terms, adjacent Fibonacci numbers converge on 0.618. Two of the three impulse waves tend toward equal time and size or else a 0.618 multiple. Wave 5 often finishes in the Fibonacci region of wave 1 measured from the end of wave 3. Wave c often measures 1.618 times wave a. Triangle legs are also related by that ratio.
Editorial use: apply the ratio check only after the legs exist. If later waves do not land near those 0.618-family proportions, the labels can be invalidated before any forecast is allowed.
All readings on this track · 33 readings
- 1986Gold as a double zigzag before a contracting B-wave triangle
- 1990Scoring competing wave counts after a crash
- 1992Pre-trade checklist for trendline and triangle signals
- 1995Chart patterns as tactics, not strategy
- 1996Constructing Elliott wave counts with triangles and Fibonacci
- 1996A price-channel case study with a pending triangle signal and a planned stop-loss
- 1996Expanding triangle as a dual-label fourth-wave reversal worksheet
- 1997Rising wedge construction, breakout, and volume
- 1997Confirm structure and conditions before naming a Triangle pattern
- 1999Drawing the Triangle pattern before Breakout confirmation and the Stop-loss order
- 2000Four-phase market cycle triangle breakouts
- 2000Continuation triangles as a three-lock experiment
- 2001Folding rule: stacking three trendlines on an accelerating swing
- 2003A scored symmetrical triangle on a utility stock
- 2003Constructing wedges versus flat-boundary triangles
- 2004Testing triangle breakouts against volume filters
- 2004Mute triangles, histogram force, and trader optimization
- 2004Constructing falsifiable reversal and continuation patterns
- 2004Construct a corrective rising wedge before treating it as a short
- 2004A continuation triangle with Fibonacci targets and an apex stop
- 2005Pre-breakout filters for classic chart patterns
- 2005Reverse trendlines as a geometry lab for convergence and expanding triangles
- 2005Volume shapes versus triangle and double-pattern breakouts
- 2005A nested-pattern checklist on the 2005 euro
- 2005Volume test for a descending triangle breakout
- 2010Constructing triangle, broadening, and head and shoulders patterns
- 2011Treat a numeric pattern rank as a shortlist
- 2011Evaluating the head-and-shoulders as a falsifiable reversal
- 2013Auditing chart patterns by the first post-breakout swing
- 2014A three-gate entry for a triangle pullback
- 2014Golden triangle: a 50-day pause that still needs both gates
- 2014The triangle qualifier came after the rating pre-screen and the fifty-day bounce
- 2018Aligning daily, weekly, and monthly triangles with trendlines and Fibonacci retracements