1990issue C071-8
Hourly breakouts gated by absolute tick volume
Testers gated hourly Treasury-bond breakouts with a fixed tick-count floor, then limited which clock hours could place stops and how long those stops could wait. A fill received a 1500-dollar money-management stop, and a later qualifying 1:00 bar could attempt a reverse.
- Activity was read as the raw tick count inside a completed hourly bar and judged against a fixed volume-cutoff, not against the prior bar.
- The first and last daytime hours were dropped because the volume-bulge from open-and-close order flow routinely cleared a 250-tick floor.
- After each clock hour was tested on its own, only the 10:00, 12:00, and 1:00 bars were carried forward, and the 1:00 bar was combined with a 100-tick floor.
- A fill had to occur inside a one-hour fill-window and then received a 1500-dollar money-management stop; a new qualifying 1:00 bar could replace that stop with a two-contract reverse.
What had to be true before an order
The testers treated bar activity as an absolute tick count rather than a comparison with the prior bar. They asked whether a breakout was only worth acting on above a fixed activity floor.
That reading is absolute-tick-volume: the raw tick count inside a completed bar, used as a stand-alone activity level. The floor itself is the volume-cutoff: a fixed tick-count that a bar must clear before a breakout of that bar is allowed to generate an order.
The first hourly scan
The first procedure used hourly Treasury-bond bars and omitted the night session because the testers did not intend to trade overnight.
Observed hourly tick counts ran from below 50 to above 300, and the testers scanned that range in steps of 50. In that scan, a move through the prior bar high or low was treated as more meaningful when the completed hourly bar exceeded 250 ticks.
The volume-bulge at the open and close
Opening and closing hours typically cleared the 250-tick floor because of concentrated open-and-close order flow. That routine surge of ticks in the first and last daytime bars is the volume-bulge.
The testers dropped the first and last daytime bars instead of giving those hours a separate cutoff.
Which clock hours may place stops
A second procedure asked whether clock hour mattered. After each hourly bar, stop orders sat for at most one hour. A fill then received a 1500-dollar money-management stop, and an unfilled order was canceled until the next day.
The one-hour wait is the fill-window: the limited interval after a signal bar during which the breakout order may be filled before it is canceled. The 1500-dollar attachment is a money-management stop: a fixed-dollar protective stop left working until it is hit, replaced, or restored.
After testing each clock hour separately, the testers carried only the 10:00, 12:00, and 1:00 breakouts forward and then concentrated on the 1:00 bar as the candidate to combine with the volume filter.
The combined 1:00 rule
Combining the 1:00-bar breakout with the same 50-to-300 tick cutoff grid, the testers treated 100 ticks as the relevant activity floor for that hour.
The combined rule inspected the 12:00 to 1:00 Treasury-bond bar at 1 p.m. Central Time. If tick volume exceeded 100, a buy-stop one tick above the high and a sell-stop one tick below the low were placed. That placement is an hourly-breakout: a stop one tick beyond the high or low of a finished one-hour bar, left live only until the next hour ends.
A fill before 2 p.m. canceled the opposite order and attached a 1500-dollar good-until-canceled money-management stop.
When a new 1:00 bar can reverse
If already long under that stop and the next 1:00 bar again exceeded 100 ticks, the protective stop was replaced by a two-contract sell-stop under the bar to reverse. That replacement is a position-reverse: the protective stop becomes a two-contract stop through the opposite side of a new qualifying bar so a fill flips the existing position.
If that reverse was not filled by 2 p.m., the original 1500-dollar stop was restored.
All readings on this track · 25 readings
- 1988Early entry as the session switch for an opening-range breakout
- 1989Evaluating inside-day filters on opening-range breakouts
- 1989Opening-range breakout after a narrow-range-four session
- 1989A joint contraction setup as the arming switch for an opening-range breakout
- 1989Next-session opening-range rules after a bear hook
- 1989Same-session exits from multi-day open-close codes
- 1989A close-to-close sequence is a bias label, not a trigger
- 1989Inside-day contraction as a same-session open-to-close rule
- 1990Evaluating five-day soybean open-to-close rules
- 1990Hourly breakouts gated by absolute tick volume
- 1993Premarket setup selection and opening-range rules
- 1994First-hour opening-range construction as a refusal problem
- 1995Why historically tested rules fail without a decision process
- 2001The opening range as a measuring stick for a ladder breakout
- 2001Evaluating an opening reaction as one timed stop procedure
- 2003Swing trading, opening-range checks, and the decision to stand aside
- 2006Monitor each opening-range setup as its own regime
- 2006Midday breakout rules from the opening range
- 2007Opening-range breakout as one session procedure
- 2007Evaluating same-day opening range entry rules
- 2008Overnight auction regimes and the intraday hold-or-exit choice
- 2010Construct a market-state-first range-breakout system as one procedure
- 2013Opening-hour stop as a session filter
- 2017Overnight volume as a construction step for the opening-range breakout
- 2017Night-volume gate for opening range breakouts