2018issue C0732-34
An expected-value test for vertical option spreads
A vertical option-spread is handled as one pass-or-abstain procedure. Credit or debit is accepted only after an expected-value filter compares it with a probability-weighted half-width, and size is capped before the order is sent.
- A vertical option-spread is a same-expiration put pair or call pair at two strikes and need not involve owning the underlying.
- The expected-value filter accepts a credit only when it exceeds a probability-weighted half-width, and a debit only when it stays below that same hurdle.
- Credit-spread risk equals the strike width minus the credit, and size is capped before the option-spread is sent so a consecutive-loss streak remains survivable.
- The test holds the spread to expiration and sets aside early offset. Offers far from the hurdle are less likely to fill because listed prices already embed similar technical inputs.
What the option-spread is
A vertical option-spread uses two options of the same type and the same expiration at two different strikes. It need not involve owning the underlying.
In this archive workflow the option-spread is a same-expiration put pair or call pair used as one testable entry, exit, and abstention procedure.
Four constructions
The four constructions are a credit bull put, a debit bull call, a debit bear put, and a credit bear call. Credit constructions are usually preferred because the underlying can move farther before a loss begins.
A bull-put credit sells the higher put strike and buys a lower-strike put. The thesis is that the underlying stays at or above the short strike through expiration. Platform strike-hit probabilities estimate whether those two strikes are reached first.
The expected-value filter
Expected-value is a pre-entry filter that compares collected credit or paid debit with a probability-weighted strike width so the loss bound is known before the order is placed.
For a bull-put credit, a positive result requires the credit to exceed the product of the two strike-hit probabilities and half the strike width. A bear-put vertical-debit-spread has a positive expectation only when the debit is smaller than that same probability-weighted half-width.
Bull-call and bear-call versions reuse the same hurdle after the two strike-hit probabilities are replaced by the complementary probabilities that those strikes are not reached first.
Expiration, fills, and size
The expectation test holds the spread to expiration and sets aside early offset. Offers far from the hurdle are less likely to fill because listed prices already embed similar technical inputs.
Credit-spread risk is the remaining loss bound on a credit vertical, equal to the strike width minus the credit. Wider strikes can push that bound past a stated account limit, so size is checked before the option-spread is sent.
The income-style procedure takes a play only when the odds filter is favorable and keeps size small enough that a consecutive-loss streak remains survivable.
All readings on this track · 29 readings
- 1986Rank listed calls against a vertical debit inside one forecast band
- 1990Constructing vertical debit spreads around implied volatility
- 1994Even-money call spread after a stop-limit gap
- 1995Payoff anchors for bull and bear vertical spreads
- 1995Matching vertical spreads to forecast confidence
- 1997A defined-risk short vertical as a single testable procedure
- 1998Vertical debit spreads when implied volatility is elevated
- 2001Constructing vertical debit spreads with a preset risk-reward filter
- 2002Regime-first construction of vertical debit spreads
- 2003Sizing a vertical by the constraint you can enforce
- 2006Event premiums, straddle bias, and volatility-hedged spreads
- 2006From a winning long call to a bull vertical debit spread
- 2007Vertical debit spread construction from codes and premiums
- 2010Vertical construction as a bounded-risk procedure
- 2010Zero-cash repair of an underwater long
- 2011Cheap long calls and in-the-money debit vertical marks
- 2011Vertical debit value path, volatility, liquidity, and box exits
- 2013Constructing defined-risk vertical call spreads
- 2014Protective put versus seasonal debit spread
- 2014One bearish energy thesis, three strike geometries
- 2014Coffee versus equity as a two-sided debit-spread drill
- 2015Natural-gas thesis: ETF drag versus a call debit spread
- 2017Funding a call spread with an offsetting put spread
- 2018An expected-value test for vertical option spreads
- 2019Option ladder construction for financed vertical debits
- 2020One-week call versus bull-put premium tradeoffs
- 2020Constructing in-the-money versus out-of-the-money bull call debit spreads
- 2020Combining vertical debit spreads on a volatility product
- 2025Time decay as a decision variable in an NVDA bull call spread