2014issue C1125
Coffee versus equity as a two-sided debit-spread drill
This archive lesson converts one coffee-versus-equity regime story into a pair of vertical debit spreads so the continuation case, the fade case, and the choice to stand aside share the same defined-risk arithmetic.
- Teach one coffee-versus-equity regime story as a pair of vertical debit spreads so continuation, fade, and standing aside share the same defined-risk arithmetic.
- A vertical debit spread buys the closer option and sells a farther same-type option at the same expiry, paying a net debit that caps both loss and gain.
- The archive specified an April 2015 80/85 call vertical last marked at 1.55, and an opposing put vertical that buys the higher-strike put and sells a lower-strike put.
- Chart notes set a bullish projection above 82 and a bearish projection below 72, and treated a coffee break to fresh yearly highs as a possible cue that the stock could roll over.
A two-sided classroom drill
TradersWeek editorial. Teach this archive write-up as a two-sided classroom drill. Convert one coffee-versus-equity regime story into a pair of vertical debit spreads so the continuation case, the fade case, and the choice to stand aside share the same defined-risk arithmetic.
TradersWeek editorial. An option-spread is a paired long and short option used as one procedure so entry, exit, cost, and abstention can be checked together. A vertical-debit-spread is a same-expiry spread that buys the closer option and sells a farther same-type option, paying a net debit to cap both loss and gain. Intermarket analysis reads one market against another, here cash coffee versus an equity, to place a single trade idea in a regime or input-cost context.
The coffee-versus-equity story
The write-up described cash coffee as up 65% year to date after a bounce from 2014 lows and about a 50% retracement of the 2011 high.
It framed Starbucks as having advanced while coffee fell, including a rise from the low $30s to above $60 in 2012, an April to August 2013 pullback as coffee retraced off its lows, and a later move from near $40 in April 2013 to about $80.
The bullish call vertical
The bullish case study specified an April 2015 80/85 call vertical last marked at 1.55, described as a $155 plus commissions debit for the right to buy 100 shares at $80 and the obligation to sell at $85.
On that call vertical, the write-up stated the capped reward as five points minus the 1.55 debit, or 3.45.
TradersWeek editorial. That structure is a bull-call-spread: a call vertical that pays a debit for upside participation up to the short strike.
The opposing put vertical
The opposing case was specified as a put vertical that buys the higher-strike put and sells a lower-strike put to reduce the net debit while limiting upside risk if the stock declines.
TradersWeek editorial. That structure is a put-vertical-spread: a put vertical that pays a debit for downside participation while the short lower-strike put reduces cost and caps the gain. Both sides of the drill then use the same vertical-debit-spread arithmetic: a net debit, a capped loss, and a capped gain.
Projections and the choice to stand aside
Chart notes set a bullish projection above 82 and a bearish projection below 72, and treated a coffee break to fresh yearly highs as a possible cue that the stock could roll over.
TradersWeek editorial. Those notes keep continuation, fade, and abstention inside one option-spread procedure. If neither vertical is taken, standing aside is a checked outcome, not a leftover.
Two time horizons
The write-up contrasted short-horizon rule-based execution with longer-horizon ideas that can start from news, and noted that Northern Hemisphere summer is South America's coffee-growing winter as context for a possible move into the following spring.
TradersWeek editorial. Keep the seasonal note as background for the intermarket story. The entry, exit, and abstention check still belongs to the defined-risk spreads, not to the news that may have started the longer-horizon idea.
All readings on this track · 29 readings
- 1986Rank listed calls against a vertical debit inside one forecast band
- 1990Constructing vertical debit spreads around implied volatility
- 1994Even-money call spread after a stop-limit gap
- 1995Payoff anchors for bull and bear vertical spreads
- 1995Matching vertical spreads to forecast confidence
- 1997A defined-risk short vertical as a single testable procedure
- 1998Vertical debit spreads when implied volatility is elevated
- 2001Constructing vertical debit spreads with a preset risk-reward filter
- 2002Regime-first construction of vertical debit spreads
- 2003Sizing a vertical by the constraint you can enforce
- 2006Event premiums, straddle bias, and volatility-hedged spreads
- 2006From a winning long call to a bull vertical debit spread
- 2007Vertical debit spread construction from codes and premiums
- 2010Vertical construction as a bounded-risk procedure
- 2010Zero-cash repair of an underwater long
- 2011Cheap long calls and in-the-money debit vertical marks
- 2011Vertical debit value path, volatility, liquidity, and box exits
- 2013Constructing defined-risk vertical call spreads
- 2014Protective put versus seasonal debit spread
- 2014One bearish energy thesis, three strike geometries
- 2014Coffee versus equity as a two-sided debit-spread drill
- 2015Natural-gas thesis: ETF drag versus a call debit spread
- 2017Funding a call spread with an offsetting put spread
- 2018An expected-value test for vertical option spreads
- 2019Option ladder construction for financed vertical debits
- 2020One-week call versus bull-put premium tradeoffs
- 2020Constructing in-the-money versus out-of-the-money bull call debit spreads
- 2020Combining vertical debit spreads on a volatility product
- 2025Time decay as a decision variable in an NVDA bull call spread