1989issue C041-6
Evaluating commodity cycle personalities with spectral histograms
A two-year maximum-entropy scan left each of 12 commodity contracts with its own cycle-length histogram. Editorial reading treats the accepted dominant-cycle peak as a contract-level score only after the 6-decibel clearance rate and the concentration of that histogram are both inspected.
- A maximum-entropy spectral scan of short-term cycles on 12 commodity contracts over a two-year sample produced a distinct cycle-length histogram for each contract.
- Contracts labeled as meats, grains, or metals did not necessarily share similar cycle histograms.
- A reading was retained only when cyclic content reached at least 6 decibels, and contracts were then compared by how often that bar was cleared out of 451 chances and by the histogram peak taken as the dominant cycle.
- The most cyclic contracts cleared the 6-decibel threshold on 30% to 40% of measured days and showed the most concentrated histograms. The S&P 500 histogram showed two peaks, at 9 days and at 14 days.
What the archive measured
A maximum-entropy spectral scan of short-term cycles on 12 commodity contracts over a two-year sample produced a distinct cycle-length histogram for each contract. Each daily price input was the midpoint of that day's high and low on a perpetual contract of 500 records.
After a 50-record warmup, dominant-cycle and cyclic-content values were recorded daily from record 50 through record 500, yielding 451 measurements. The maximum-entropy spectrum was the measurement engine for each lookback: a high-resolution spectral estimate taken from a short ordered price window.
Which readings were retained
A measurement was retained only when cyclic content, defined as a signal-to-noise ratio, reached at least 6 decibels. Energy with periods shorter than 5 days or longer than 40 days, including trend, was classified as noise. That noise band was excluded from the accepted cycle-length counts.
Spectral analysis, in this workflow, is the decomposition of an ordered price series into cycle-length energy so contracts can be compared by how often a length exceeds a noise floor.
How contracts were compared
Contracts were compared by how often the 6-decibel bar was cleared out of 451 chances and by the histogram peak taken as the dominant cycle, with a 2-day band around that peak. The dominant cycle is the cycle length at or nearest the accepted histogram peak after low-signal windows are removed.
In the summary table, the most cyclic contracts cleared the 6-decibel dominant-cycle threshold on 30% to 40% of measured days and also showed the most concentrated histograms.
Group labels and histogram shape
Contracts labeled as meats, grains, or metals did not necessarily share similar cycle histograms. A cycle personality is the recurring shape of a contract's accepted cycle-length histogram, including whether one peak or two dominate.
The S&P 500 histogram showed two peaks, at 9 days and at 14 days.
Editorial reading of the score
Editorial: clearance and concentration are separate checks. A contract that rarely cleared the 6-decibel bar does not give the same empirical score as one that cleared it on 30% to 40% of measured days and also sat in a tight histogram peak.
Editorial: because sector labels did not necessarily produce matching histograms, the archive comparison is read here as a contract-by-contract score, not as a group rule that can be copied from one meat, grain, or metal to another.
All readings on this track · 28 readings
- 1984Constructing maximum-entropy spectra for dominant-cycle forecasts
- 1984How to construct a maximum-entropy cycle model
- 1984Constructing a maximum-entropy forecast from a chosen lookback
- 1985Constructing period-locked half-cycle and full-cycle averages
- 1986Why Fourier windows limit dominant-cycle resolution
- 1987Assembling short-lookback maximum-entropy cycle forecasts
- 1988Why a fitted dominant cycle is not a forecast
- 1989Evaluating commodity cycle personalities with spectral histograms
- 1989Evaluating next-session cycle forecasts with stops
- 1989Constructing cycle-aged volatility trailing stops
- 1990A channel signal-to-noise gate for dominant-cycle forecasts
- 1990Year-over-year dominant cycle personality audit
- 1991Cyclic entry from a locked dominant-cycle phase
- 1992Stationarity states on synchronized futures spectral contours
- 1997Hidden horizon assumptions in dominant-cycle readings
- 1997When market cycles are absent more than present
- 1997A spectral estimator that retunes indicators to the measured cycle
- 2000Constructing a Hilbert dominant cycle and a maximum-entropy refinement
- 2000Switch trend and cycle indicators after a half-cycle dwell test
- 2000Constructing a dominant-cycle squelch trend filter
- 2000Phasor displays for dominant-cycle construction
- 2002Low-lag trendline from elliptic and dominant-cycle notches
- 2004Spectral peaks are mode diagnostics, not forecasts
- 2004Compressive last-stage oscillator construction
- 2013Constructing trend failure curves from qualified-trend transitions
- 2014Lookback range, a two-lag smoother, and next-bar fills
- 2014Constructing a MESA stochastic with roofing and SuperSmoother filters
- 2016Constructing spectral heatmaps for dominant market cycles