Skip to main content
Track Mean reversion
28 / 36
Library

2015issue C0422-25

Build a mean-reversion basket from one correlation path

A mean-reverting basket is constructed so members generally move together. A directed acyclic graph maps pairwise correlation onto the longest continuous linkage of names, then the same mean-reversion rules fade leaders and buy laggards inside that group.

  • A mean-reverting basket is constructed so members generally move together; nonconforming names can disrupt the intended group behavior.
  • A directed acyclic graph can map equities as nodes and pairwise correlation as weighted edges, then return the longest continuous linkage as the candidate basket.
  • Correlation analysis is used because the goal is co-movement of the whole group, not the two-asset cointegration framing often used for pair selection in Pairs trading.
  • The intended trade fades members that lead away from the group mean and buys members that lag, using an overbought/oversold metric such as relative strength index.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Membership is part of the design

A mean-reverting basket is constructed so that members generally move together. Nonconforming names can disrupt the intended group behavior.

One correlation path as the basket

A directed acyclic graph can map equities as nodes and pairwise correlation as weighted edges, then return the longest continuous linkage of interrelated names as the candidate basket.

One illustrated pipeline starts from a large universe, measures Pearson correlation on 250 calendar days of end-of-day prices, ranks pairs, loads the top pairs into the graph, and takes the critical path as the output set.

Group co-movement instead of pair cointegration

Correlation analysis is used here because the design goal is co-movement of the whole group, not the two-asset cointegration framing often used for pair selection in Pairs trading.

Mean reversion on group outliers

The intended trade is to fade members that lead away from the group mean and to buy members that lag, using an overbought/oversold metric such as relative strength index to identify outliers.

One illustrated outlier rule computes relative strength index on each member and, each period, selects the highest and lowest readings in the group as the active names.

Construction as a test platform

Comparative backtests of random, near-zero-correlation, negatively correlated, and high-correlation DAG baskets were used to judge whether tighter intercorrelation improved the mean-reversion test platform.

Further testing is still required before treating DAG group selection as superior to other basket-construction mechanisms.

Correlated DAG basket versus SPY, 2006–2014

Under the same RSI mean-reversion rules, the 19-name correlation-path basket finishes at 615 percent while SPY reaches 91.5 percent, with Sharpe 3.19 and a 23.9 percent drawdown. The path was read from the Quantopian equity curve in the article; those two endings are the printed legend totals as of the week of 23 June 2014.
Under the same RSI mean-reversion rules, the 19-name correlation-path basket finishes at 615 percent while SPY reaches 91.5 percent, with Sharpe 3.19 and a 23.9 percent drawdown. The path was read from the Quantopian equity curve in the article; those two endings are the printed legend totals as of the week of 23 June 2014.S&P 500 DAG basket vs SPY · January 2006 through June 2014 · 2006-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2014-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

Pearson pairwise correlations used 250 calendar days of 2010 end-of-day prices; the basket is the DAG critical path of 19 S&P 500 names, traded with RSI method 1. Intermediate points are approximate raster readings rounded to 10 percentage points. The 615.4% and 91.5% endings are the printed legend values. SPY sits near the axis on this scale, so only its ending is precise.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
28 of 36 in the Mean reversion track
201522-24 pp.Next on Mean reversionIndex dip reversion is horizon and regime dependentMean-reversion is a bounce toward a recent average after a short-term decline, and it is treated as instrument-dependent: commodity and currency series as more continuation-prone, the US equity daily series as more reversion-prone.
All readings on this track · 36 readings
  1. 1986A futures fade as one range, order, and secrecy procedure
  2. 1992Constructing the mass-index range-reversal procedure
  3. 1993Switch trend following and mean reversion with an equity-curve filter
  4. 1994Evaluating weekly trend-following and mean-reversion timing rules
  5. 1996Dual-horizon bands for a precious-metals cash switch
  6. 1997Constructing a moving regression oscillator
  7. 1997Regime-dependent long and short rules in mechanical systems
  8. 2002A same-session pair book with a morning-fixed volatility envelope
  9. 2004Combining noncorrelated trend and reversion systems
  10. 2004Failed-breakout overlays on trending markets
  11. 2004Rank rotation after a path split, then Robustness testing
  12. 2004Range-bound tape as a filter for trend and oscillator rules
  13. 2005A moving-average short pullback that is only in scope in a decline
  14. 2006Constructing an adaptive price zone from a double-smoothed range
  15. 2007Two-period relative strength index versus a one-week universe baseline
  16. 2008Building ETF mean-reversion entries with a two-bar washout
  17. 2008Rebuild a short-period stochastic as a premier stochastic oscillator
  18. 2008A three-market regime map for equity bounces and dollar cycles
  19. 2009Option trade adjustment as one testable procedure
  20. 2010Implied volatility as a May 2010 market-regime lab for the S&P 500
  21. 2011Treat a large one-day move as a classified event
  22. 2011Long-call exits, volatility regimes, and spread assignment
  23. 2011Pairing same-horizon oscillators with a walk filter
  24. 2012Two-bar band extreme entries with trailing stops
  25. 2012An eight-month average as a monthly gate for high-yield bonds
  26. 2014Complete the checklist before the trade
  27. 2014Coded rules should face one test, not a kinder sample
  28. 2015Build a mean-reversion basket from one correlation path
  29. 2015Index dip reversion is horizon and regime dependent
  30. 2016Treat the end of a trend as a handoff, not a broken system
  31. 2017A testable half-swing pullback for trend continuation
  32. 2017Evaluating four swing detection rules for mean reversion
  33. 2018Intraday breakout and mean reversion as one rule set
  34. 2018Evaluating rare consecutive-close mean-reversion entries
  35. 2020Moving-average baselines, price vetoes, and mean reversion
  36. 2020Two-dimensional FX scaling for trend and reversal systems
All 43 readings tagged Mean reversion
Also on Mean reversion5 readings