Skip to main content
Track Flag and pennant
13 / 26
Library

2005issue C051-2

Constructing flag and pennant rules from pole to exit

Date the rest from a swing, size the pole, then attach slope, volume, confirmation, and timed exits so a flag or pennant is a hypothesis that can fail before any target is allowed.

  • Flag-duration is counted from the latest 17-percent zigzag swing and is accepted only when that count is greater than 2 bars and less than 21 bars.
  • Pole-height is the percentage rise from pole-base to pole-top, and the pole-scaled-target is 1.94 times that height raised to the power 0.724, applied to the current close.
  • Long-entry construction requires a steep pre-flag-slope, a compact flag-window-slope, volume-decay, and volatility-contraction before confirmation gates are applied.
  • Exits are five tests: the pole-scaled-target, a flag-window-low-stop, an inactivity-exit, a trailing close, and a hard time close.
Entries in this reading1 entry

From sketch to construction

The historical workflow dates the compacting rest from a swing, sizes the prior thrust as a pole, and only then attaches slope, volume, confirmation, and timed-exit tests. Those steps define the flag or pennant as a written rule rather than a freehand sketch.

Editorial reading: treat the pattern as a construction problem. Once the rest is dated and the pole is sized, later gates can invalidate the idea before any target is allowed.

Dating the rest

Flag-duration is the number of bars from the latest qualifying swing that defines the compacting rest after the pole. In this construction the latest swing is a 17-percent zigzag swing.

The duration is accepted only when that count is greater than 2 bars and less than 21 bars.

Sizing the pole and writing the objective

Pole-base is the lookback swing low used as the starting level of the prior thrust. Pole-top is the swing high used as the peak of that prior thrust.

Pole-height is constructed as the percentage rise from pole-base to pole-top. That percentage is used later to scale the objective.

The coded objective is 1.94 times pole-height raised to the power 0.724. The matching target price applies that percentage to the current close. The pole-scaled-target is therefore an objective written as a function of pole-height rather than a fixed multiple of the rest.

Slope, volume-decay, and volatility-contraction

Long-entry construction requires a 13-bar pre-flag-slope above 2.2 percent. Pre-flag-slope is a regression slope taken on the thrust that precedes the rest. It must stay steep enough to count as a pole.

The same entry construction requires a flag-window-slope below 0.2 percent and a flag-window-slope floor of -1.2. Flag-window-slope is a regression slope taken across the rest itself. It must stay compact rather than trend strongly.

Volume over the flag window must slope below -2 percent. That downward slope is volume-decay, used as evidence that the pause is contracting. The slope of price standard deviation over the flag-duration must be negative. That falling dispersion is volatility-contraction, used as evidence that the pause is tightening.

Confirmation gates

Confirmation gates require a 20-period stochastic above 55, a 10-period ADX above 30, a cutoff-filtered money-flow reading above 10, a volume-flow-measure reading above -3, and a close that is higher than both the prior close and the current open.

How the volume-flow-measure is built

The volume-flow-measure is a long-lookback, cutoff-filtered signed-volume series used as a confirmation gate, then lightly smoothed.

The series caps volume at 2.5 times its average, signs the capped volume by whether typical-price change exceeds a 0.2-times-volatility cutoff, sums that signed volume over a user-set lookback defaulting to 130 bars, and then applies a 3-period exponential smooth.

Five constructed exits

Exits are constructed as a set of five tests.

The first test is the pole-scaled-target. The second is a flag-window-low-stop: an invalidation level set from the lowest close of the rest, shifted to the entry bar, and written here as a break of the flag-window low.

The third is an inactivity-exit, a time-and-progress rule that closes the idea after more than 14 bars if open gain is under one-quarter of pole-height. The fourth is a trailing close after more than 3 bars if price is below 90 percent of the 4-bar high. The fifth is a hard time close after more than 24 bars.

What the companion scan reports

The companion scan is specified to report the pre-breakout close, pole-top, pole-base, pole-height percentage, target percentage, and target price. All of those fields are on a closing-price basis. The scan uses the same filter as the long-entry rule.

Editorial reading of the workflow

Editorial comment: the archive facts describe a historical construction order, not a claim about present-day use. After flag-duration, pole-height, slope, volume, confirmation, and the five exits are written down, the flag or pennant can fail before the pole-scaled-target is allowed.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
13 of 26 in the Flag and pennant track
20051-4 pp.Next on Flag and pennantFanline construction for testing trend healthBuild fanlines from the same measured high-low range used for the 38.2 percent, 50 percent, and 61.8 percent horizontal retracements so both maps test one pullback hypothesis.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
  1. 1986Constructing bounded relative-strength overlays from oscillator limits
  2. 1989Point-and-figure fulcrum, count, and flag as three jobs
  3. 1996The high, tight flag as a three-checkpoint continuation exam
  4. 2000Test chart patterns with confirmation, not names
  5. 2001Failed chart patterns as reverse breakout signals
  6. 2002Ascending triangle and flag: a three-checkpoint QQQ case study
  7. 2002Two-stage chart reading after breakouts
  8. 2002The second pattern after a breakout
  9. 2003Building flags, pennants, and triangles as continuation pauses
  10. 2003When trendline channels age into a wedge or a break
  11. 2004Bearish chart patterns need confirmation before the turn
  12. 2004Constructing flags, pennants, and triangles from swing pivots
  13. 2005Constructing flag and pennant rules from pole to exit
  14. 2005Fanline construction for testing trend health
  15. 2005When flag-and-pennant breakout scans fail a measurement audit
  16. 2006Testing a bear-flag target after the pause is confirmed
  17. 2007Homebuilder rebound as a bear-flag, trendline, and volume case study
  18. 2008Completed chart patterns as reward-to-risk arithmetic
  19. 2012Reading this file
  20. 2012Reading regime change: when to stop trading
  21. 2014Intraday flag construction with breakout and stop rules
  22. 2015Lock lookback and chart scale before you mark a flag or pennant
  23. 2017Constructing delayed buy-stops on bull flags and pennants
  24. 2018Copy an ABC swing as a ruler, then test flags and Fibonacci degree
  25. 2019Failed flags, pennants, and triangles as a completed experiment
  26. 2020Confirming candlestick and flag signals on a weekly chart
All 31 readings tagged Flag and pennant
Also on Flag and pennant5 readings