2005issue C061-4
Trend-following as one testable signal procedure
The archive describes trend-following as a systematic-procedure that selects markets, waits for an upward or downward move, and opens a long or short position only after entry, exit, and size are already specified. The downside is treated as known before entry. The reason for the move is treated as unnecessary.
- Trend-following waits for price to be moving and then outputs a signal to enter, exit, or abstain, not a forecast.
- A systematic-procedure specifies entry, exit, position size, and intentional-abstention with if-then rules before a trade is opened.
- The planned-loss-point is set before entry, while upside is treated as unknown and losses are accepted as planned.
- Price-only-input is treated as enough to decide whether a series can be traded. Market identity and a causal story are optional.
How the procedure starts
The procedure begins by selecting a portfolio of markets to watch and then waits for an upward or downward move before opening an initial long or short position.
Market selection is described as intentional rather than random, with the objective of participating in markets that exhibit trends.
Rules specified before entry
The approach is characterized as systematic: entry, exit, and position size are specified before a trade is opened, using if-then contingencies rather than discretionary bets made while watching the screen.
An exit for either a gain or a loss is specified before entry, and that pre-commitment is contrasted with directional commentary that never states when a view should be abandoned.
Join a market that is already moving
The reason a market is moving is treated as unnecessary. The stated priority is to join a market that is already moving and to know in advance where and when to exit if price turns against the position.
Trend-following is a rules-based way to take long or short exposure after price is already moving and to stay with that exposure until a predefined adverse turn.
Breakout-entry and predefined-exit
A representative long entry is a late breakout after momentum is already visible. That breakout-entry waits for visible momentum instead of trying to locate the exact start of a move.
A representative exit comes after the move has turned, so the operator is not aiming to catch the exact low or high. The predefined-exit is the loss or reversal condition that is known before a position is opened.
Planned-loss-point
The downside is treated as a quantity set before entry, while the upside is treated as unknown, and losses are accepted as a planned part of the process.
The planned-loss-point is the known downside at which the procedure exits, independent of unknown upside.
Price-only-input and reaction-versus-prediction
Market identity and a fundamental explanation are treated as optional. Price data alone is said to be enough to decide whether a series can be traded. Price-only-input treats the price series as sufficient market-state input, without requiring a causal story or even the market's name.
Devices such as breakouts or moving averages are framed as reaction tools, not as a stack of predictors. The stated limit is that the procedure can respond but cannot forecast. Reaction-versus-prediction means acting after the market has moved, rather than stacking technical devices in an attempt to forecast the next move.
Intentional-abstention and holding-period
Some operators remain out of the market for stretches of time. Intentional-abstention is staying out of a market that is not presenting a qualifying trend, rather than forcing activity.
Longer-horizon operators are distinguished from shorter-horizon systematic traders, but both are described as applying historically inspected rules without discretion. The holding-period is the time a position remains open under the system's exit rules. The operators discussed here are described as longer-horizon.
What must be specified
Editorial: the archive describes a historical workflow. TradersWeek uses that workflow to teach a single point. A signal is the procedure's output: enter, exit, or abstain, produced from rule inputs, market state, and execution constraints rather than from a forecast.
Editorial: if entry, exit, size, or abstention is left for later judgment, the thing being tested is no longer the systematic-procedure.
All readings on this track · 38 readings
- 1986A Marshall Wave book is assembled one confirmed stance at a time
- 1987Operator gut check when two systems conflict
- 1988Visual trend rules need one testable procedure
- 1988Audit trend and breakout rules sold without tests
- 1992Weekly 4 percent close reversal case study
- 1992Write down the plan, then wait for the cross
- 1994Constructing a three-rule moving-average system
- 1995Weekly long-only trend rules with a gated retracement exit
- 1997Constructing rainbow charts with repeated smoothing
- 1997Three-line break as a one-parameter mechanical filter
- 2000Nested horizon trend alignment with a momentum stack
- 2001When certainty turns off the stop
- 2001Price must confirm every setup
- 2001Constructing a color stack from every lookback
- 2002Evaluating mechanical trend signals from ten-session average excursions
- 2004Trend pullbacks with a fifty-day average and relative strength index
- 2005Stochastic overbought as a trend-regime state
- 2005Trend-following as one testable signal procedure
- 2007One checklist for entry, exit and abstention after a market switch
- 2008Parallel listings and divergent trend behavior
- 2008Recovery headlines versus trend-regime rules
- 2008Constructing an intraday trend procedure with confirming close, retest, and planned exits
- 2010Mechanical trend-following system design, stops, and validation
- 2010A trading-plan that sets entry, stop, trail, and pause together
- 2010Multi-horizon cycle signals, trend filters, and stops
- 2012Weekly bear-market and shock signals as a mechanical procedure
- 2013A 2013 rates week as a structure-first exit drill
- 2013Trend following as one testable procedure
- 2013A forex veto checklist: trend, pair economy, and crowd bias
- 2015Relative-strength-index rules under a 20-percent trend filter
- 2015Trend-gated oscillator entry and exit rules
- 2016Trend process versus end-goal trading
- 2017Gold as a classroom for one midterm-trend procedure
- 2017Falling-knife FX longs wait for a four-hour trend turn
- 2018A closed procedure for quarterly sector rank slots
- 2018A recursive median as shared state for trend rules
- 2020Moving-average construction as an objective trend filter
- 2020Constructing first and second cross trend entries