Skip to main content
Track Trend following
19 / 38
Library

2007issue C131-4

One checklist for entry, exit and abstention after a market switch

A venue change is handled as a full systems rewrite. One pre-trade procedure binds the falsification-stop, session-scale confirmation-entry, the pair-specific-program, and the stay-flat-window before any size is allowed.

  • The pre-trade sequence first records a directional opinion and the action that would disprove it, then places a falsification-stop beyond that level before any profit objective or reward-to-risk figure is set.
  • Confirmation-entry is read on 480-minute session-bars; 120-minute and 60-minute bars only refine timing, and shorter charts were rejected because typical currency move size did not cover spread and commission costs.
  • A pair-specific-program keeps pound spike holds and euro grind-trades on separate recipes, while fixed-dollar-risk makes a 30-pip pound stop and a 10-pip euro stop the same cash loss.
  • The stay-flat-window is part of the same checklist: the book is flat through identified shock windows, and imported stock or futures playbooks are treated as a failure mode.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A venue change rewrites the whole procedure

When the trading venue changes, the archive workflow does not carry over an old stock or futures playbook. Entry, exit, and abstention are rebuilt as one pre-trade sequence. Size is allowed only after that sequence is complete.

The working object is a single procedure. It has to bind the protective exit, the session-scale confirmation, the pair hold rule, and the scheduled flat window before a position is permitted.

Record the opinion, then place the falsification-stop

The pre-trade sequence first records a directional opinion and the market action that would disprove it. The falsification-stop is then placed beyond that disproof level. It is not parked on a round number and it is not a fixed pip offset.

Only after the stop is placed does the same sequence set a profit objective and compute reward-to-risk. The stated preference is three-to-one through five-to-one or better. Reward-to-risk is not calculated against a stop that has not yet been located.

Read structure on session-bars

The working chart stack starts with 480-minute bars so each candle maps to one regional session. Those session-bars are the structure chart. The stack steps down to 120-minute and 60-minute bars only to refine entries and exits.

Timeframes shorter than 60 minutes were rejected for this system because typical currency move size did not cover spread and commission costs. The short chart is not treated as a valid decision surface.

Currency entries wait for confirmation of a reversal on the 480-minute chart. Confirmation-entry requires higher lows and lower highs or a reversal candle. The sequence does not act on an anticipated turn.

Pair-specific holds share one cash risk

Each pair has its own hold rule under a pair-specific-program, because spike-and-pause behavior is not the same as channel-slide behavior. Pound setups were more often taken as short spikes. Euro setups were more often held as a grind-trade inside a 10- to 15-pip channel.

Size is fixed in cash terms. A 30-pip pound stop and a 10-pip euro stop represent the same money at risk if either trade is stopped out. That fixed-dollar-risk rule keeps the two recipes on one risk unit even though the pip distances differ.

Stay flat through shock windows

Because the market is continuous, the procedure requires working stop and limit orders. The busiest observed window was about 07:00-11:00 Eastern during the Europe-United States overlap. Orders are meant to be in the book through that flow, not placed after it has already moved.

The abstention rule is to be flat through identified shock windows such as CPI, PPI, policy releases, and major geopolitical events that historically produced outsized whipsaw. The stay-flat-window sits inside the same checklist. It is not a later overlay added after size has already been chosen.

Rebuild pair logic from observation

Imported stock or futures playbooks are treated as a failure mode. Pair behavior and confirmation logic are rebuilt from observation of the new venue. A larger trade sample is required so reward-to-risk arithmetic can dominate any single directional call.

The opinion is still recorded first. The rest of the procedure exists so that one call cannot override the falsification-stop, the confirmation-entry, the pair-specific-program, or the stay-flat-window.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
19 of 38 in the Trend following track
20081-6 pp.Next on Trend followingParallel listings and divergent trend behaviorA 60-day moving average was the explicit quantitative baseline on the Shanghai listing and was described as more reliable than shorter averages for defining the dominant trend.
All readings on this track · 38 readings
  1. 1986A Marshall Wave book is assembled one confirmed stance at a time
  2. 1987Operator gut check when two systems conflict
  3. 1988Visual trend rules need one testable procedure
  4. 1988Audit trend and breakout rules sold without tests
  5. 1992Weekly 4 percent close reversal case study
  6. 1992Write down the plan, then wait for the cross
  7. 1994Constructing a three-rule moving-average system
  8. 1995Weekly long-only trend rules with a gated retracement exit
  9. 1997Constructing rainbow charts with repeated smoothing
  10. 1997Three-line break as a one-parameter mechanical filter
  11. 2000Nested horizon trend alignment with a momentum stack
  12. 2001When certainty turns off the stop
  13. 2001Price must confirm every setup
  14. 2001Constructing a color stack from every lookback
  15. 2002Evaluating mechanical trend signals from ten-session average excursions
  16. 2004Trend pullbacks with a fifty-day average and relative strength index
  17. 2005Stochastic overbought as a trend-regime state
  18. 2005Trend-following as one testable signal procedure
  19. 2007One checklist for entry, exit and abstention after a market switch
  20. 2008Parallel listings and divergent trend behavior
  21. 2008Recovery headlines versus trend-regime rules
  22. 2008Constructing an intraday trend procedure with confirming close, retest, and planned exits
  23. 2010Mechanical trend-following system design, stops, and validation
  24. 2010A trading-plan that sets entry, stop, trail, and pause together
  25. 2010Multi-horizon cycle signals, trend filters, and stops
  26. 2012Weekly bear-market and shock signals as a mechanical procedure
  27. 2013A 2013 rates week as a structure-first exit drill
  28. 2013Trend following as one testable procedure
  29. 2013A forex veto checklist: trend, pair economy, and crowd bias
  30. 2015Relative-strength-index rules under a 20-percent trend filter
  31. 2015Trend-gated oscillator entry and exit rules
  32. 2016Trend process versus end-goal trading
  33. 2017Gold as a classroom for one midterm-trend procedure
  34. 2017Falling-knife FX longs wait for a four-hour trend turn
  35. 2018A closed procedure for quarterly sector rank slots
  36. 2018A recursive median as shared state for trend rules
  37. 2020Moving-average construction as an objective trend filter
  38. 2020Constructing first and second cross trend entries
All 168 readings tagged Trend following
Also on Trend following5 readings