2010issue C0682
Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
A listed futures market stays on the blotter only after a liquidity filter, open-interest depth, and an equal-dollar size count show that the order is tradable. The same columns then let implementation cost be compared across listed contracts.
- Keep a futures market on the blotter only after a liquidity filter, open-interest depth, and an equal-dollar size count show that the order is tradable.
- Relative contract liquidity multiplies an equal-profit contract count by open interest and a volume factor so markets can be ordered from easiest to hardest to trade.
- Liquidity figures are meaningful only against other markets in the same column. The top of the rank is easier to buy and sell, and the bottom is the most difficult.
- Contracts marked with one activity indicator or none are treated as thinly traded and less suitable for speculative participation.
Screen the contract before it reaches the blotter
A liquidity filter is a pre-trade screen that ranks listed futures by how easily an order can be entered and exited. It uses depth, activity, and cost inputs rather than a directional forecast. Open interest analysis supplies the outstanding contract count as a depth input, so a market with more open positions ranks as easier to transact, all else equal.
Futures contract selection then chooses which listed market to trade by comparing liquidity, margin efficiency, and how many contracts are needed for the same dollar exposure.
How relative contract liquidity is built
A listed-futures liquidity rank can be built by multiplying contract point value, a three-year maximum price-motion estimate, open interest, and a volume adjustment that is typically between 1 and 4. Relative contract liquidity is the comparative score that multiplies an equal-profit contract count by total open interest and a volume factor, so markets can be ordered from easiest to hardest to trade.
The volume factor is an activity adjustment, typically running from 1 to 4, that down-weights thin volume and up-weights very heavy volume in the liquidity rank. In this workflow it is defined as the greater of 1 or exp(ln(volume)/ln(5000) - 2).
Equal-dollar size and effective percent margin
An equal-dollar-profit count scales each market by contract value times the largest price change observed over three years, so every entry in that column represents the same dollar potential. Contracts to trade for equal dollar profit is how many contracts of one market must be traded to match another market's dollar profit potential after that scaling.
Effective percent margin equals the margin dollar amount divided by the three-year dollar price range of the contract, then multiplied by one hundred. That percentage lets margin outlay be compared across markets.
Contracts needed to equalize dollar profit across listed futures

The source sizes every market as tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion, so each bar is scaled to the same dollar-profit potential.
Read the columns as a comparison
The liquidity columns are proportional comparisons only. A figure is meaningful against other markets in the same column, with the top of the rank easier to buy and sell and the bottom the most difficult.
Contracts marked with one activity indicator or none are treated as thinly traded and therefore less suitable for speculative participation. In the accompanying rank, short-term interest-rate futures occupy the highest relative-liquidity positions, while many currency, metal, and agricultural contracts occupy the lowest.
For listed shares, period volume divided by shares outstanding is treated as a turnover-rate proxy for trading liquidity.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
- 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
- 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
- 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
- 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
- 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
- 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
- 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
- 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
- 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
- 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
- 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
- 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
- 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
- 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
- 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
- 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
- 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
- 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
- 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
- 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
- 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
- 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
- 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
- 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
- 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
- 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
- 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
- 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
- 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
- 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
- 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
- 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
- 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
- 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
- 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
- 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest