Skip to main content
Track Futures contract selection
20 / 51
Library

2013issue C0864

Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size

A listed-futures liquidity rank scales each contract to the same potential dollar move, then weights that size by open interest and a volume factor so markets can be compared by how readily their outstanding books can be transacted.

  • Relative contract liquidity ranks how readily a listed futures book can be transacted by combining an equal-dollar contract count, outstanding open interest, and a volume adjustment.
  • Contracts to trade for equal-dollar profit scale each market so that its multi-year maximum dollar excursion matches the same dollar scale used for other listed markets.
  • Effective percent margin divides posted margin dollars by the contract’s three-year dollar range so capital stretch can be compared across markets that do not share the same raw margin rate.
  • Each comparison column is a proportional measure that is meaningful only against other contracts in the same column; markets at the top of the relative-liquidity order are the easiest outstanding books to transact.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What the ranking measures

Relative contract liquidity is a cross-market ranking of how readily a listed futures book can be transacted. It is built from an equal-dollar contract count, outstanding open interest, and a volume adjustment.

Open interest is the stock of outstanding futures contracts and is the size input when judging how much of a market can actually be bought or sold. A liquidity filter is a pre-trade screen that keeps only markets whose activity, size, and implementation-cost inputs support an executable order over the life of that order.

Equal-dollar contract count

An equal-dollar contract count is formed by combining a contract’s tick dollar value with its three-year maximum price excursion so that each market is scaled to the same potential dollar move.

That count is the number of contracts of one futures market needed so that its multi-year maximum dollar excursion matches the same dollar scale used for other listed markets in the comparison.

How the rank is assembled

A listed-futures liquidity rank can be built by multiplying contract point value, a three-year historical maximum price move, open interest, and a volume adjustment typically set between 1 and 4.

Relative contract liquidity can also be written as that equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor. The volume factor is a multiplier that raises or lowers a contract when volume is unusually thin or unusually heavy relative to a fixed activity base.

In that ranking the volume factor is the greater of 1 and an exponential transform of volume relative to a 5,000-contract base, specifically exp(ln(volume) / ln(5000) - 2).

Effective percent margin

Effective percent margin is posted margin dollars divided by the three-year dollar range of the contract, then multiplied by 100. The result lets margin use be compared across markets that do not share the same raw margin rate.

Reading a comparison table

A dot-count display of relative liquidity treats more marks as higher activity and treats one mark or none as thin activity that is harder to execute.

Each column in such a comparison is a proportional measure and is meaningful only against other contracts in the same column. Markets at the top of the relative-liquidity order are those whose outstanding contracts are easiest to transact, and markets at the bottom are the most difficult.

A parallel turnover proxy for shares

For listed shares, period volume as a percentage of shares outstanding is presented as a parallel turnover proxy for trading liquidity. That share construction is distinct from the futures construction that uses open interest and an equal-dollar size scaler.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
20 of 51 in the Futures contract selection track
201364-64 pp.Next on Futures contract selectionA pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selectionFutures contract selection begins by scaling every listed market to the same potential dollar outcome with an equal-dollar contract count.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
  1. 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
  2. 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
  3. 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
  4. 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
  5. 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  6. 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  7. 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
  8. 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
  9. 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  10. 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
  11. 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
  12. 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
  13. 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
  14. 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
  15. 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
  16. 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
  17. 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
  18. 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
  19. 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
  20. 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
  21. 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  22. 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
  23. 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
  24. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
  25. 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  26. 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  27. 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  28. 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
  29. 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  30. 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
  31. 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
  32. 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
  33. 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
  34. 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
  35. 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  36. 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
  37. 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
  38. 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  39. 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
  40. 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
  41. 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  42. 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  43. 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
  44. 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
  45. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
  46. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
  47. 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
  48. 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
  49. 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
  50. 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
  51. 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest
All 51 readings tagged Futures contract selection
Also on Futures contract selection5 readings