Skip to main content
Track Futures contract selection
17 / 51
Library

2013issue C0460

Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice

A listed-futures liquidity filter ranks markets after equal-dollar scaling, open-interest stock, and a volume factor. Thin names are set aside so contract choice starts with what can be executed.

  • Relative contract liquidity is equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor, ordered so higher values indicate easier execution.
  • Equal-dollar size is tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion, and those sizes are treated as sharing the same dollar potential.
  • Contracts marked with one liquidity indicator or none are treated as thinly traded and deprioritized for speculative execution.
  • Effective percent margin is margin dollars divided by the three-year dollar range, then multiplied by 100, not a raw posted rate.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A screen before a market view

Listed futures can look attractive on technical grounds and still be a poor place to put an order. The historical workflow treats that gap as a liquidity problem. A liquidity filter is a pre-trade screen that keeps only contracts whose activity, depth, and cost profile can support an order through its life cycle.

Open interest analysis uses outstanding contract inventory as a depth input so a rank reflects standing size, not only recent prints. Futures contract selection then chooses among listed markets after placing them on a common dollar, margin, and liquidity footing.

Equal-dollar size and relative liquidity

An equal-dollar size for each market is the product of tick dollar value and the three-year maximum price excursion. Those sizes are treated as sharing the same dollar potential. Equal-dollar contract count is how many contracts of one market are needed to match another market's three-year dollar excursion.

Relative contract liquidity is the equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor, then ordered so higher values indicate easier execution. A listed-futures liquidity rank can be formed the same way by multiplying contract point value, a three-year maximum price move, open interest, and a volume factor usually set between 1 and 4.

The volume factor is a multiplier, typically from 1 to 4, that does not reward thin activity. It is constructed as the greater of 1 or the exponential of the natural log of volume divided by the natural log of 5000, minus 2.

Margin, thin names, and how columns are read

Effective percent margin equals margin dollars divided by the three-year dollar range of the contract, then multiplied by 100. It is initial margin expressed as a percentage of the contract's three-year dollar price range rather than as a raw posted rate.

Contracts marked with one liquidity indicator or none are treated as thinly traded and deprioritized for speculative execution. Figures in each comparison column are proportional measures and are intended to be read only against other markets in that same column.

Share-turnover as an equity analogue

For equities, trading activity is treated as a liquidity proxy equal to period volume as a share of shares outstanding. Share-turnover is that ratio, used as a stock-market analogue of trading liquidity.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
17 of 51 in the Futures contract selection track
201364-64 pp.Next on Futures contract selectionFutures liquidity filters for executable contract selectionA liquidity filter keeps only contracts with enough activity, book depth, and volume to be treated as executable, and sets thin books aside.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
  1. 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
  2. 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
  3. 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
  4. 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
  5. 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  6. 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  7. 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
  8. 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
  9. 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  10. 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
  11. 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
  12. 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
  13. 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
  14. 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
  15. 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
  16. 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
  17. 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
  18. 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
  19. 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
  20. 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
  21. 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  22. 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
  23. 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
  24. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
  25. 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  26. 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  27. 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  28. 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
  29. 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  30. 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
  31. 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
  32. 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
  33. 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
  34. 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
  35. 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  36. 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
  37. 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
  38. 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  39. 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
  40. 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
  41. 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  42. 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  43. 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
  44. 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
  45. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
  46. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
  47. 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
  48. 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
  49. 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
  50. 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
  51. 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest
All 51 readings tagged Futures contract selection
Also on Futures contract selection5 readings